What is stroke symptom knowledge?

Authors

  • Ian Mosley,

    Corresponding author
    1. Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    2. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    • Correspondence: Ian Mosley, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton, Vic. 3800, Australia.

      E-mail: ian.mosley@monash.edu

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Marcus Nicol,

    1. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Geoffrey Donnan,

    1. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Amanda G. Thrift,

    1. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    2. Department of Medicine, Southern Clinical School, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Helen M. Dewey

    1. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    2. Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Conflict of interest: None declared.
  • Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) ‘Centre of Clinical Research Excellence (Neurosciences)’, Australia. A. G. T. was supported by a fellowship from the NHMRC (438700).

Abstract

Background

No commonly agreed definition exists for ‘stroke symptom knowledge’ among members of the general public. Recalling at least one correct stroke symptom has been used in the past. However, this criterion was not associated with rapid presentation to hospital. Rapid presentation is vital in order to provide effective acute stroke treatment.

Aims and/or hypothesis

We sought to identify a base level of community stroke symptom knowledge associated with stroke recognition when symptoms occur, an immediate ambulance call, and ‘stroke recognition and immediately calling an ambulance’ as a single sequence of events.

Methods

For six-months in 2004–2005, we identified all patients with stroke living in a defined region of Melbourne and who were transported by ambulance to one of the three hospitals. The person who called the ambulance (caller) was interviewed.

Results

One hundred ninety-eight patients were identified and 150 callers interviewed. Symptoms reported most frequently were limb weakness (67%), speech problems (57%), and facial weakness (24%). Reporting at least two of the symptoms – facial weakness, limb weakness, or speech problems (62% of callers) – was associated with stroke recognition (P = 0·004), immediately calling an ambulance (P = 0·065), and both ‘stroke recognition and immediately calling an ambulance’ (P = 0·053).

Conclusions

Knowing at least two of the symptoms – facial weakness, limb weakness, and speech problems – appears to be an appropriate indicator of stroke symptom knowledge as it is associated with stroke recognition and appropriate action. Recognizing stroke symptoms and immediately calling an ambulance increase the potential to reduce prehospital time delays and improve eligibility of acute stroke patients for rapid treatment.

Ancillary