Conflict of interest: None declared.
Letter to the editor
Relation between red blood cell distribution width and ischemic stroke: a case-control study
Article first published online: 23 JUL 2013
© 2013 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2013 World Stroke Organization
International Journal of Stroke
Volume 8, Issue 6, page E36, August 2013
How to Cite
Ramírez-Moreno, J. M., Gonzalez-Gomez, M., Ollero-Ortiz, A., Roa-Montero, A. M., Gómez-Baquero, M. J. and Constantino-Silva, A. B. (2013), Relation between red blood cell distribution width and ischemic stroke: a case-control study. International Journal of Stroke, 8: E36. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12091
Funding: This study was not supported by any funding.
- Issue published online: 23 JUL 2013
- Article first published online: 23 JUL 2013
Recent studies have showed an association between higher red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and increased risk of death [1, 2] and cardiovascular disease events  in middle-aged and older adults. The aim of this study is to determine the strength of association between RDW levels and ischemic stroke.
A case-control study in a single center was conducted. Two hundred twenty-four consecutive patients suffering a first-ever ischemic stroke confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Two hundred twenty-four randomly selected patients, free of the cerebrovascular disease and from the same population as the cases, were chosen as controls. Baseline RDW was considered as a continuous variable and in quartiles. We use Mantel–Haenszel Test for trend to examine the association between RDW levels and stroke risk. In order to identify determinants of RDW, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RDW in cases ranged from 12·27% to 26·17% [mean, 14·48%; standard deviation (SD), 1·76] and in controls ranged from 11·30% to 21·70% (mean, 13·91%; SD, 1·43), P = 0·001. Patients in the fourth quartile (RDW > 14·61%) were significantly more like to have a stroke compared with patients in the lower quartile [RDW < 13·27%, odds ratio (OR) 4·50; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2·50–8·01, P < 0·0001]. After adjusting, there remained a stepwise association between RDW levels and risk of stroke; compared with the lowest quartile of RDW: second quartile, OR 2·5 (95% CI, 1·4–4·6); third quartile, OR 3·2 (95% CI, 1·7–5·9); and four quartile, OR 5·9 (95% CI, 3·1–11·4). The analysis for trend was statistically significant by Mantel–Haenszel Test, reflecting a clear dose–response gradient; higher levels of RDW were associated with increased risk of stroke (Xt = 4·69; P < 0·0001) (Fig. 1). In multivariate linear regression analysis, RDW was significantly associated with age (b = 0·121, P = 0·034), atrial fibrillation (b = 0·148, P = 0·009), cancer (b = 0·103, P = 0·063), and hemoglobin (b = −0·141, P = 0·011).
Case-control studies can be a very efficient way of identifying an association between an exposure and an outcome. If care is taken with definitions, selection of the controls, and reducing the potential for bias, case-control studies can generate valuable information . Based on this study, RDW is a powerful predictor of stroke. The biological mechanisms underlying this association are not clear . Considering that RDW is an inexpensive test, further research is certainly needed to investigate the potential mechanistic role of RDW in stroke occurrence.