Conflict of interest: The University of California (The Regents) receive funding for J. L. Saver's services as a scientific consultant regarding trial design and conduct from Covidien/ev3, BrainsGate, CoAxia, Grifols/Talecris, Ferrer, Mitsubishi, Genervon, Benechill, Asubio, and Sygnis. J. L. Saver is an investigator in the NIH FAST-MAG, MR RESCUE, ICES, CUFFS, CLEAR-ER, and IMS 3 multicenter clinical trials for which the UC Regents receive payments based on clinical trial performance. J. L. Saver has also served as an unpaid site investigator in multicenter trials run by Covidien/ev3, Genervon, Lundbeck, and Mitsubishi for which the UC Regents received payments based on the clinical trial contracts for the number of participants enrolled. J. L. Saver and R. Jahan are employees of the University of California, which holds a patent on retriever devices for stroke. The University of California Regents receive funding for R. Jahan's services as a scientific consultant regarding trial design and conduct from Covidien/ev3 and Chestnut Medical. E. I. Levy serves as a scientific consultant for Covidien/ev3, Codman and Shurtleff Inc, and TheraSyn Sensors Inc; and receives fees for carotid stent training from Covidien/ev3 and Abbott Vascular. T. G. Jovin has served as a scientific consultant to Covidien/ev3, CoAxia, Concentric Medical, and Micrus. R. G. Nogueira has served as a scientific consultant to Covidien/ev3, CoAxia, and Concentric Medical. V. M. Pereira was global PI for the STAR trial and serves as a consultant to Covidien. D. S. Liebeskind serves as a consultant to Stryker and Covidien. R. G. Nogueira was on the steering committee for SWIFT and the core laboratory for STAR, serves as a consultant for Covidien, serves on physician advisory boards for Stryker and Penumbra. Other authors report no financial or other potential conflicts of interest of relevance to the present study.
The THRIVE score strongly predicts outcomes in patients treated with the Solitaire device in the SWIFT and STAR trials
Article first published online: 20 MAY 2014
© 2014 World Stroke Organization
International Journal of Stroke
Volume 9, Issue 6, pages 698–704, August 2014
How to Cite
Flint, A. C., Cullen, S. P., Rao, V. A., Faigeles, B. S., Pereira, V. M., Levy, E. I., Jovin, T. G., Liebeskind, D. S., Nogueira, R. G., Jahan, R., Saver, J. L. and SWIFT and STAR trialists (2014), The THRIVE score strongly predicts outcomes in patients treated with the Solitaire device in the SWIFT and STAR trials. International Journal of Stroke, 9: 698–704. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12292
- Issue published online: 17 JUL 2014
- Article first published online: 20 MAY 2014
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 APR 2014
- Manuscript Received: 22 JAN 2014
- acute stroke therapy;
- cerebral infarction;
- ischemic stroke;
The Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (THRIVE) score strongly predicts clinical outcome, mortality, and risk of thrombolytic haemorrhage in ischemic stroke patients, and performs similarly well in patients receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, endovascular stroke treatment, or no acute treatment. It is not known if the THRIVE score predicts outcomes with the Solitaire endovascular stroke treatment device.
To validate the relationship between the THRIVE score and outcomes after treatment with the Solitaire endovascular stroke treatment device.
The study conducted a retrospective analysis of the prospective SWIFT and STAR trials to examine the relationship between THRIVE and outcomes after treatment with the Solitaire device. We examined the relationship between THRIVE and clinical outcomes (good outcome or death at 90 days) among patients in SWIFT and STAR. Receiver–operator characteristics curve analysis was used to compare THRIVE score performance with other stroke prediction scores. Multivariable modeling was used to confirm the independence of the THRIVE score from procedure-specific predictors (successful recanalization or device used) and other predictors of functional outcome.
The THRIVE score strongly predicts good outcome and death among patients treated with the Solitaire device in SWIFT and STAR (Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test for trend P < 0·001 for good outcome, P = 0·01 for death). In receiver–operator characteristics (ROC) curve comparisons, totaled health risks in vascular events score is superior to Stroke Prognostication using Age and NIH Stroke Scale score-100 (P < 0·001) and performed similarly to Houston Intra-Arterial Therapy score (HIAT) (P = 0·98) and HIAT-2 (P = 0·54). In multivariable models, THRIVE's prediction of good outcome is not altered after controlling for recanalization or after controlling for device used. The THRIVE score remains a strong independent predictor after controlling for the above predictors together with time to procedure, rate of symptomatic haemorrhage, and use of general anesthesia. Of note, use of general anesthesia was not an independent predictor of outcome in SWIFT + STAR after controlling for totaled health risks in vascular events and other factors.
The THRIVE score strongly predicts clinical outcome and mortality in patients treated with the Solitaire device in the SWIFT and STAR trials. The lack of interaction between THRIVE and procedure-specific elements such as vessel recanalization or device choice makes the THRIVE score a reasonable candidate for use as a patient selection criterion in stroke clinical trials.