• 1
    Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50: 854857.
  • 2
    Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001; 87: 408410.
  • 3
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J. Urol. 2002; 168: 945949.
  • 4
    Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J. Urol. 1982; 128: 492497.
  • 5
    Lepor H, Gregerman M, Crosby R, Mostofi FK, Walsh PC. Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis. J. Urol. 1985; 133: 207212.
  • 6
    Takenaka A, Murakami G, Soga H, Han SH, Arai Y, Fujisawa M. Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2004; 172: 10321035.
  • 7
    Takenaka A, Leung RA, Fujisawa M, Tewari AK. Anatomy of autonomic nerve component in the male pelvis: the new concept from a perspective for robotic nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. World J. Urol. 2006; 24: 136143.
  • 8
    Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int. 2004; 94: 10711076.
  • 9
    Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J. Urol. 2005; 174: 22912296; discussion 2296.
  • 10
    Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Do M et al. A comparison of outcomes for interfascial and intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 76: 743748.
  • 11
    Nielsen ME, Schaeffer EM, Marschke P, Walsh PC. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2008; 180: 25572564; discussion 2564.
  • 12
    van der Poel HG, de Blok W, Joshi N, van Muilekom E. Preservation of lateral prostatic fascia is associated with urine continence after robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2009; 55: 892900.
  • 13
    Lunacek A, Schwentner C, Fritsch H, Bartsch G, Strasser H. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: “curtain dissection” of the neurovascular bundle. BJU Int. 2005; 95: 12261231.
  • 14
    Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Michl U et al. Nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51: 110111.
  • 15
    Lee SB, Hong SK, Choe G, Lee SE. Periprostatic distribution of nerves in specimens from non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2008; 72: 878881.
  • 16
    Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A et al. Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry. Eur. Urol. 2008; 54: 353360.
  • 17
    Hisasue S, Hashimoto K, Kobayashi K et al. Baseline erectile function alters the cavernous nerve quantity and distribution around the prostate. J. Urol. 2010; 184: 20622067.
  • 18
    Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, Stark AT, Shah NL, Menon M. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the “Veil of Aphrodite” technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur. Urol. 2006; 49: 10651073; discussion 1073–4.
  • 19
    Alsaid B, Karam I, Bessede T et al. Tridimensional computer-assisted anatomic dissection of posterolateral prostatic neurovascular bundles. Eur. Urol. 2010; 58: 281287.
  • 20
    Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004; 34: 463468.
  • 21
    Sievert KD, Hennenlotter J, Laible I et al. The periprostatic autonomic nerves – bundle or layer? Eur. Urol. 2008; 54: 11091116.
  • 22
    Takenaka A, Tewari A, Hara R et al. Pelvic autonomic nerve mapping around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation with simultaneous measurement of intracavernous and intraurethral pressure. J. Urol. 2007; 177: 225229; discussion 229.
  • 23
    Kaiho Y, Nakagawa H, Saito H et al. Nerves at the ventral prostatic capsule contribute to erectile function: initial electrophysiological assessment in humans. Eur. Urol. 2009; 55: 148154.
  • 24
    Rassweiler J. Intrafascial nerve-sparing laproscopic radical prostatectomy: do we really preserve relevant nerve-fibres? Eur. Urol. 2006; 49: 955957.
  • 25
    Mauroy B, Demondion X, Drizenko A et al. The inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic plexus): its importance in neural preservation techniques. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2003; 25: 615.
  • 26
    Costello AJ, Dowdle BW, Namdarian B, Pedersen J, Murphy DG. Immunohistochemical study of the cavernous nerves in the periprostatic region. BJU Int. 2011; 107: 12101215.
  • 27
    Ganzer R, Stolzenburg JU, Wieland WF, Brundl J. Anatomic Study of Periprostatic Nerve Distribution: immunohistochemical Differentiation of Parasympathetic and Sympathetic Nerve Fibres. Eur. Urol. 2012; 62: 11501156.
  • 28
    Takenaka A, Soga H, Hinata N et al. Classification of the distribution of cavernous nerve fibers around the prostate by intraoperative electrical stimulation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2011; 23: 5661.
  • 29
    Walz J, Graefen M, Huland H. Surgical anatomy of the prostate in the era of radical robotic prostatectomy. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2011; 21: 173178.
  • 30
    Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Eggener SE, Antenor JA, Han M, Catalona WJ. Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J. Urol. 2004; 172 (6 Pt 1): 22272231.
  • 31
    Gralnek D, Wessells H, Cui H, Dalkin BL. Differences in sexual function and quality of life after nerve sparing and nonnerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2000; 163: 11661169; discussion 1169–70.
  • 32
    Kaiho Y, Nakagawa H, Ikeda Y et al. Intraoperative electrophysiological confirmation of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2005; 173: 11391142.
  • 33
    Takenaka A, Soga H, Sakai I et al. Influence of nerve-sparing procedure on early recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol. 2009; 23: 11151119.
  • 34
    Choi WW, Freire MP, Soukup JR et al. Nerve-sparing technique and urinary control after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J. Urol. 2011; 29: 2127.
  • 35
    Suardi N, Moschini M, Gallina A et al. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery. BJU Int. 2012; doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11315.x.
  • 36
    Abel EJ, Masterson TA, Warner JN, Valentine K, Dechet C. Nerve-sparing prostatectomy and urinary function: a prospective analysis using validated quality-of-life measures. Urology 2009; 73: 13361340.
  • 37
    Takenaka A, Hara R, Soga H, Murakami G, Fujisawa M. A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy, based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers. BJU Int. 2005; 95: 766771.
  • 38
    Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, 2012.
  • 39
    Myers RP. Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2001; 28: 473490.
  • 40
    Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M et al. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2008; 53: 931940.
  • 41
    Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M et al. An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2003; 43: 444454.
  • 42
    Graefen M, Walz J, Huland H. Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2006; 49: 3848.
  • 43
    Budäus L, Isbarn H, Schlomm T et al. Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2009; 56: 317324.
  • 44
    Secin FP, Serio A, Bianco FJ et al. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51: 764771.
  • 45
    Ayala AG, Ro JY, Babaian R, Troncoso P, Grignon DJ. The prostatic capsule: does it exist? Its importance in the staging and treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1989; 13: 2127.
  • 46
    Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2010; 57: 179192.
  • 47
    Patel VR, Schatloff O, Chauhan S et al. The role of the prostatic vasculature as a landmark for nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 61: 571576.
  • 48
    Hirata E, Fujiwara H, Hayashi S et al. Intergender differences in histological architecture of the fascia pelvis parietalis: a cadaveric study. Clin. Anat. 2011; 24: 469477.
  • 49
    Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006; 98: 314323.
  • 50
    Schatloff O, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, Kameh D, Palmer KJ, Patel VR. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2012; 61: 796802.
  • 51
    Terminology FCoA. Terminologia Anatomica: International Anatomical Terminology. Thieme Medical Publishers, Stuttgart, 1998.
  • 52
    Church JM, Raudkivi PJ, Hill GL. The surgical anatomy of the rectum – a review with particular relevance to the hazards of rectal mobilisation. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 1987; 2: 158166.
  • 53
    Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Anatomy of Denonvilliers' fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon. Br. J. Surg. 2000; 87: 12881299.
  • 54
    MacLennan GT. Hinman's Atlas of UroSurgical Anatomy. Saunders, Philadelphia, 2012.
  • 55
    Tewari A, El-Hakim A, Rao S, Raman JD. Identification of the retrotrigonal layer as a key anatomical landmark during robotically assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006; 98: 829832.
  • 56
    Secin FP, Karanikolas N, Gopalan A et al. The anterior layer of Denonvilliers' fascia: a common misconception in the laparoscopic prostatectomy literature. J. Urol. 2007; 177: 521525.
  • 57
    Soga H, Takenaka A, Murakami G, Fujisawa M. Topographical relationship between urethral rhabdosphincter and rectourethralis muscle: a better understanding of the apical dissection and the posterior stitches in radical prostatectomy. Int. J. Urol. 2008; 15: 729732.
  • 58
    Villers A, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Boccon-Gibod L, Stamey TA. Invasion of Denonvilliers' fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens. J. Urol. 1993; 149: 793798.
  • 59
    Takenaka A, Murakami G, Matsubara A, Han SH, Fujisawa M. Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 2005; 65: 136142.
  • 60
    Steiner MS. Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 427435.
  • 61
    Wimpissinger TF, Tschabitscher M, Feichtinger H, Stackl W. Surgical anatomy of the puboprostatic complex with special reference to radical perineal prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2003; 92: 681684.
  • 62
    Kirby RS. Prostate Cancer: Principles and Practice. Taylor & Francis, London, 2006.
  • 63
    Tewari AK, Bigelow K, Rao S et al. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 69: 726731.
  • 64
    Gillitzer R, Thüroff JW, Neisius A, Wöllner J, Hampel C. Robot-assisted ascending-descending laparoscopic nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2009; 104: 128153.
  • 65
    Takenaka A, Tewari AK, Leung RA et al. Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy: anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2007; 51: 433440; discussion 440.
  • 66
    Myers RP. Detrusor apron, associated vascular plexus, and avascular plane: relevance to radical retropubic prostatectomy – anatomic and surgical commentary. Urology 2002; 59: 472479.
  • 67
    McNeal J. The prostate gland: morphology and pathobiology. Monogr Urol. 1988; 9: 3654.
  • 68
    Tanagho EA, Pugh RC. The anatomy and function of the ureterovesical junction. Br. J. Urol. 1963; 35: 151165.
  • 69
    Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JU, Dieterich F. A new theory of micturition and urinary continence based on histomorphological studies. 2. The musculus sphincter vesicae: continence or sexual function? Urol. Int. 1994; 52: 154158.
  • 70
    Curto F, Benijts J, Pansadoro A et al. Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique. Eur. Urol. 2006; 49: 344352.
  • 71
    Gaker DL, Steel BL. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence: pathology and long-term results. J. Urol. 2004; 172 (6 Pt 2): 25492552.
  • 72
    You YC, Kim TH, Sung GT. Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation and Posterior Urethral Reconstruction during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Urinary Continence. Korean J. Urol. 2012; 53: 2933.
  • 73
    Patel VR, Coelho RF, Rocco B et al. Positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 511516.
  • 74
    Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2006; 49: 866871; discussion 871–2.
  • 75
    Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M et al. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J. Urol. 2008; 179 (5 Suppl): S4751.
  • 76
    Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T et al. Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 320329.
  • 77
    van Randenborgh H, Paul R, Kubler H, Breul J, Hartung R. Improved urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy with preparation of a long, partially intraprostatic portion of the membraneous urethra: an analysis of 1013 consecutive cases. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004; 7: 253257.
  • 78
    Tsivian M, Zilberman DE, Ferrandino MN, Madden JF, Mouraviev V, Albala DM. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics. J. Endourol. 2012; 26: 361365.
  • 79
    Oelrich TM. The urethral sphincter muscle in the male. Am. J. Anat. 1980; 158: 229246.
  • 80
    Myers RP, Cheville JC, Pawlina W. Making anatomic terminology of the prostate and contiguous structures clinically useful: historical review and suggestions for revision in the 21st century. Clin. Anat. 2010; 23: 1829.
  • 81
    Murakami G, Nakajima F, Sato TJ, Tsugane MH, Taguchi K, Tsukamoto T. Individual variations in aging of the male urethral rhabdosphincter in Japanese. Clin. Anat. 2002; 15: 241252.
  • 82
    Elbadawi A, Mathews R, Light JK, Wheeler TM. Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of rhabdosphincter component of the prostatic capsule. J. Urol. 1997; 158: 18191828.
  • 83
    McNeal JE. Normal histology of the prostate. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1988; 12: 619633.
  • 84
    Myers RP, Goellner JR, Cahill DR. Prostate shape, external striated urethral sphincter and radical prostatectomy: the apical dissection. J. Urol. 1987; 138: 543550.
  • 85
    Guru KA, Perlmutter AE, Sheldon MJ et al. Apical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: does technique matter? J. Endourol. 2009; 23: 123127.
  • 86
    Lei Y, Alemozaffar M, Williams SB et al. Athermal division and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2011; 59: 235243.
  • 87
    Tewari AK, Shevchuk MM, Sterling J et al. Multiphoton microscopy for structure identification in human prostate and periprostatic tissue: implications in prostate cancer surgery. BJU Int. 2011; 108: 14211429.