SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.910646
  • Ames, D. R., & Flynn, F. J. (2007). What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 307324. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.307
  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 126. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
  • Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal Of Selection & Assessment, 9(1/2), 9.
  • Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Leue, A. (2006). Energetical bases of extraversion: Effort, arousal, EEG, and performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 212223.
  • Bernardin, H. J., Cooke, D. K., & Villanova, P. (2000). Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 232236.
  • Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., & Brown, G. D. (2010). The dark side of conscientiousness: Conscientious people experience greater drops in life satisfaction following unemployment. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(4), 535539. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.001
  • Carter, N. T., Dalal, D. K., Boyce, A. S., O'Connell, M. S., Kung, M. C., & Delago, K. (in press). Uncovering curvilinear relationships between conscientiousness and job performance: How theoretically appropriate measurement makes an empirical difference. Journal of Applied Psychology.
  • Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19, 88106.
  • Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I. S., Berry, C. M., Li, N., & Gardner, R. G. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 11401166. doi: 10.1037/a0024004
  • Clarke, S., & Robertson, I. T. (2005). A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 355376.
  • Coker, L. A., Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2002). Maladaptive personality functioning within the big five and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16(5), 385401.
  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Côté, S., Decelles, K. A., McCarthy, J. M., Van Kleef, G. A., & Hideg, I. (2011). The Jekyll and Hyde of emotional intelligence: Emotion-regulation knowledge facilitates both prosocial and interpersonally deviant behavior. Psychological Science, 22(8), 10731080. doi: 10.1177/0956797611416251
  • Del Líbano, M., Llorens, S., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). About the dark and bright sides of self-efficacy: Workaholism and work engagement. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 688701.
  • Drasgow, F., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Stark, S. (2010). 75 years after Likert: Thurstone was right! Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 465476.
  • Erdheim, J., Wang, M., & Zickar, M. J. (2006). Linking the big five personality constructs to organizational commitment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 959970.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 2634.
  • Grieve, R., & Panebianco, L. (2013). Assessing the role of aggression, empathy, and self-serving cognitive distortions in trait emotional manipulation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(2), 7988. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2012.00059.x
  • Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(1), 8597.
  • Haigler, E. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Experimental manipulation of NEO PI-R items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 339358.
  • Harms, P. D., & Crede, M. (2010). Emotional intelligence and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 517. doi: 10.1177/1548051809350894
  • Hough, L. M. (1992). The “big five” personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139155.
  • Hough, L., & Oswald, F. (2008). Personality testing and industrial-organizational psychology: Reflections, progress, and prospects. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives On Science And Practice, 1(3), 272290.
  • Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The big five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869879.
  • International Personality Item Pool (IPIP). (2012). A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. Retrieved from http://ipip.ori.org/.
  • John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and Research (pp. 114158). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 5478. doi: 10.1037/a0017286
  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765780.
  • Judge, T. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts. In R. J. Langan-Foz, J. Cooper, & C. L. Klimoski (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 332355). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Kafetsios, K., Nezlek, J. B., & Vassiou, A. (2011). A multilevel analysis of relationships between leaders' and subordinates' emotional intelligence and emotional outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(5), 11211144. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00750.x
  • Lahuis, D. M., Martin, N. R., & Avis, J. M. (2005). Investigating nonlinear performance relations for clerical employees. Human Performance, 18(3), 199212.
  • Le, H., Oh, I. S., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 113133. doi: 10.1037/a0021016
  • LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential effects of big-five personality characteristics and general cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326336.
  • Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008). Human abilities: Emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 507536.
  • Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success. A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(367), 408.
  • O'Boyle, E. H., Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J. M., Hawver, T. H., & Story, P. A. (2011). The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 818(2010), 788818. doi: 10.1002/job
  • Piedmont, R. L., Sherman, M. F., & Sherman, N. C. (2012). Maladaptively high and low openness: The case for experiential permeability. Journal of personality, 80(6), 16411668. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00777.x
  • Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313338. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410060
  • Robie, C., & Ryan, A. M. (1999). Effects of nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity on the validity of conscientiousness in predicting overall job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 157169. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00115
  • Samuel, D. B., & Gore, W. L. (2012). Maladaptive variants of conscientiousness and agreeableness. Journal of Personality, 80(6), 16691696. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00770.x
  • Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167177. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4
  • Schyns, B., & von Collani, G. (2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational variables. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 219241. doi: 10.1080/13594320244000148
  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240261.
  • Suls, J., Martin, R., & David, J. P. (1998). Person-environment fit and its limits: Agreeableness, neurotic and emotional reactivity to interpersonal conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 8898.
  • Tett, R. P. (1998). Is Conscientiousness always positively related to job performance? The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 36, 2429.
  • Vancouver, J. B., & Kendall, L. N. (2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 11461153. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1146
  • Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., Tischner, E. C., & Putka, D. J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 506516. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.506
  • Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 605620. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.86.4.605
  • Verhaeghen, P., & Salthouse, T. A. (1997). Meta-analyses of age–cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 231249.
  • Williams, C. R., & Livingstone, L. P. (1994). Another look at the relationship between performance and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 269298.