Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Cover image for Vol. 1 Issue 1

March 2008

Volume 1, Issue 1

Pages 1–146

  1. Introduction

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response from Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response from Author
    1. From the Editor (pages 1–2)

      Paul R. Sackett

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00001.x

  2. Focal Article

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response from Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response from Author
    1. The Meaning of Employee Engagement (pages 3–30)

      WILLIAM H. MACEY and BENJAMIN SCHNEIDER

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x

  3. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response from Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response from Author
    1. Been There, Bottled That: Are State and Behavioral Work Engagement New and Useful Construct “Wines”? (pages 31–35)

      DANIEL A. NEWMAN and DAVID A. HARRISON

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00003.x

    2. Conceptual Versus Empirical Distinctions Among Constructs: Implications for Discriminant Validity (pages 36–39)

      JAMES K. HARTER and FRANK L. SCHMIDT

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00004.x

    3. The Meaning and Bleeding of Employee Engagement: How Muddy Is the Water? (pages 40–43)

      ALAN M. SAKS

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00005.x

    4. Employee Engagement at the Organizational Level of Analysis (pages 44–47)

      S. DOUGLAS PUGH and JOERG DIETZ

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00006.x

    5. Is Behavioral Engagement a Distinct and Useful Construct? (pages 48–51)

      MARK A. GRIFFIN, SHARON K. PARKER and ANDREW NEAL

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00007.x

    6. Defining Employee Engagement for Productive Research and Practice (pages 52–55)

      REESHAD S. DALAL, BRADLEY J. BRUMMEL, SERENA WEE and LISA L. THOMAS

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00008.x

    7. Leveraging Employee Engagement: The Practical Implications (pages 56–59)

      REBECCA C. MASSON, MARK A. ROYAL, TOM G. AGNEW and SAUL FINE

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00009.x

    8. Employee Engagement From a Self-Determination Theory Perspective (pages 60–62)

      JOHN P. MEYER and MARYLÈNE GAGNÉ

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00010.x

    9. Representations of Trait Engagement: Integration, Additions, and Mechanisms (pages 63–66)

      ROBERT R. HIRSCHFELD and CHRISTOPHER H. THOMAS

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00011.x

    10. The Word Is Out: We Need an Active Performance Concept for Modern Workplaces (pages 67–69)

      MICHAEL FRESE

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00012.x

    11. On the Skilled Aspect of Employee Engagement (pages 70–71)

      MICHAEL J. BURKE

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00013.x

    12. State–Trait Returns! And One Practitioner’s Request (pages 72–73)

      RICHARD M. VOSBURGH

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00014.x

    13. Enriched Engagement Through Assistance to Systems’ Change: A Proposal (pages 74–75)

      GEORGE B. GRAEN

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00015.x

  4. Response from Authors

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response from Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response from Author
    1. Engaged in Engagement: We Are Delighted We Did It (pages 76–83)

      WILLIAM H. MACEY and BENJAMIN SCHNEIDER

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00016.x

  5. Focal Article

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response from Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response from Author
    1. Why Assessment Centers Do Not Work the Way They Are Supposed To (pages 84–97)

      CHARLES E. LANCE

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00017.x

  6. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response from Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response from Author
    1. Making Assessment Centers Work the Way They Are Supposed To (pages 98–104)

      ANN HOWARD

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00018.x

    2. Mend It, Don’t End It: An Alternate View of Assessment Center Construct-Related Validity Evidence (pages 105–111)

      WINFRED ARTHUR Jr, ERIC ANTHONY DAY and DAVID J. WOEHR

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00019.x

    3. What Does Exercise-Based Assessment Really Mean? (pages 112–115)

      FILIP LIEVENS

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00020.x

    4. The Construct Validity of the Assessment Center Method and Usefulness of Dimensions as Focal Constructs (pages 116–120)

      DEBORAH E. RUPP, GEORGE C. THORNTON III and ALYSSA M. GIBBONS

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00021.x

    5. A Pragmatic View of Assessment Center Exercises and Dimensions (pages 121–124)

      BRIAN S. CONNELLY, DENIZ S. ONES, ANURADHA RAMESH and MAYNARD GOFF

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00022.x

    6. It Is Not Yet Time to Dismiss Dimensions in Assessment Centers (pages 125–127)

      KLAUS G. MELCHERS and CORNELIUS J. KÖNIG

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00023.x

    7. Improving Assessment Centers by the Trimodal Concept of Personnel Assessment (pages 128–130)

      HEINZ SCHULER

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00024.x

    8. Back to Basics of Test Construction and Scoring (pages 131–133)

      MICHAEL T. BRANNICK

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00025.x

    9. Assessment Centers Work, but for Different Reasons (pages 134–136)

      JOEL MOSES

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00026.x

    10. Narrow Standards for Efficacy and the Research Playground: Why Either–Or Conclusions Do Not Help (pages 137–139)

      ROBERT G. JONES and RICHARD J. KLIMOSKI

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00027.x

  7. Response from Author

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response from Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response from Author
    1. Where Have We Been, How Did We Get There, and Where Shall We Go? (pages 140–146)

      CHARLES E. LANCE

      Version of Record online: 29 FEB 2008 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00028.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION