Industrial and Organizational Psychology

© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Cover image for Vol. 3 Issue 4

December 2010

Volume 3, Issue 4

Pages 385–521

  1. Introduction

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    9. Index to Volume 3: 2010
    1. From the Editor (page 385)

      Cynthia D. McCauley

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01257.x

  2. Focal Article

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    9. Index to Volume 3: 2010
    1. What If Industrial–Organizational Psychology Decided to Take Workplace Decisions Seriously? (pages 386–405)

      REESHAD S. DALAL, SILVIA BONACCIO, SCOTT HIGHHOUSE, DANIEL R. ILGEN, SUSAN MOHAMMED and JEREL E. SLAUGHTER

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01258.x

  3. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    9. Index to Volume 3: 2010
    1. IOOB Already Takes JDM Seriously, but Is It Reciprocated? (pages 406–410)

      THEODORE L. HAYES and JESSICA D. WOOLDRIDGE

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01259.x

    2. The Trouble With JDM: Some Limitations to the Influence of JDM on Organizational Research (pages 411–416)

      BARRY M. STAW

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01260.x

    3. Normative Models for Strategic Decision Making in Industrial–Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (pages 417–420)

      WILLIAM P. BOTTOM and DEJUN TONY KONG

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01261.x

    4. Why Has There Been So Much JDM–IOOB Cross-Fertilization? (pages 421–423)

      GLEN WHYTE

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01262.x

    5. The Lens Model: An Application of JDM Methodologies to IOOB Practice (pages 424–428)

      DEV K. DALAL, DALIA L. DIAB, WILLIAM K. BALZER and MICHAEL E. DOHERTY

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01263.x

    6. Business Forecasters Can Gain From the Cross-Fertilization of IOOB and JDM (pages 429–430)

      PAUL GOODWIN

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01264.x

    7. The Role of Creativity in JDM (pages 431–433)

      RONI REITER-PALMON and BRAD HULLSIEK

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01265.x

    8. Can Managers Be Trained to Make Better Decisions? (pages 434–437)

      KRISTINE M. KUHN

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01266.x

    9. How Experts Make Decisions: Beyond the JDM Paradigm (pages 438–442)

      MICHAEL A. ROSEN, MARISSA SHUFFLER and EDUARDO SALAS

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01267.x

    10. Assessment Centers Are an Excellent Way of Studying Decision Making (pages 443–444)

      WILLIAM C. BYHAM

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01268.x

    11. Integrating IOOB and JDM Through Process-Oriented Research (pages 445–447)

      JOCHEN REB

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01269.x

    12. Studying Personnel and Organizational Judgments as Judgments Requires Training (pages 448–451)

      KENNETH E. SUMNER, JENNIFER BRAGGER, EDWIN OM and DANIEL MALANDRUCCOLO

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01270.x

    13. What If We Took Researchers' Workplace Decisions Seriously? Mundane Incentives Versus Intellectual Merit in the Selection of Research Topics (pages 452–454)

      TERRY CONNOLLY

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01271.x

  4. Response From Authors

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    9. Index to Volume 3: 2010
    1. Taking Workplace Decisions Seriously: This Conversation Has Been Fruitful! (pages 455–464)

      SILVIA BONACCIO, REESHAD S. DALAL, SCOTT HIGHHOUSE, DANIEL R. ILGEN, SUSAN MOHAMMED and JEREL E. SLAUGHTER

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01272.x

  5. Focal Article

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    9. Index to Volume 3: 2010
    1. 75 Years After Likert: Thurstone Was Right! (pages 465–476)

      FRITZ DRASGOW, OLEKSANDR S. CHERNYSHENKO and STEPHEN STARK

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01273.x

  6. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    9. Index to Volume 3: 2010
    1. Questionable Defeats and Discounted Victories for Likert Rating Scales (pages 477–480)

      CHRISTOPHER J. WAPLES, WILLIAM S. WEYHRAUCH, ANGELA R. CONNELL and SATORIS S. CULBERTSON

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01274.x

    2. Developing and Scaling Personality Measures: Thurstone Was Right—But So Far, Likert Was Not Wrong (pages 481–484)

      FREDERICK L. OSWALD and KRAIG L. SCHELL

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01275.x

    3. Thurstone Might Have Been Right About Attitudes, but Drasgow, Chernyshenko, and Stark Fail to Make the Case for Personality (pages 485–488)

      STEVEN PAUL REISE

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01276.x

    4. Issues That Should Not Be Overlooked in the Dominance Versus Ideal Point Controversy (pages 489–493)

      ANNA BROWN and ALBERTO MAYDEU-OLIVARES

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01277.x

    5. Two Caveats for the Use of Ideal Point Items: Discrepancies and Bivariate Constructs (pages 494–497)

      MARCUS CREDÉ

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01278.x

    6. Six Questions That Practitioners (Might) Have About Ideal Point Response Process Items (pages 498–501)

      DEV K. DALAL, SCOTT WITHROW, ROBERT E. GIBBY and MICHAEL J. ZICKAR

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01279.x

    7. If Thurstone Was Right, What Happens When We Factor Analyze Likert Scales? (pages 502–503)

      PAUL E. SPECTOR and MICHAEL T. BRANNICK

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01280.x

    8. Cognitive Processes Related to Forced-Choice, Ideal Point Responses: Drasgow, Chernyshenko, and Stark Got It Right! (pages 504–506)

      WALTER C. BORMAN

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01281.x

    9. The Ideal Point Model in Action: How the Use of Computer Adaptive Personality Scales Benefits Organizations (pages 507–510)

      TRACY M. KANTROWITZ and KATHY A. TUZINSKI

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01282.x

    10. Toward Understanding the Psychology of Unfolding (pages 511–514)

      NATHAN T. CARTER, CHRISTOPHER J. LAKE and MICHAEL J. ZICKAR

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01283.x

  7. Response From Authors

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    9. Index to Volume 3: 2010
    1. Improving the Measurement of Psychological Variables: Ideal Point Models Rock! (pages 515–520)

      FRITZ DRASGOW, OLEKSANDR S. CHERNYSHENKO and STEPHEN STARK

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01284.x

  8. Index to Volume 3: 2010

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    9. Index to Volume 3: 2010
    1. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Perspectives on Science and Practice (page 521)

      Article first published online: 11 NOV 2010 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01285.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION