Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Cover image for Vol. 4 Issue 2

June 2011

Volume 4, Issue 2

Pages 145–267

  1. Introduction

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    1. From the Editor (page 145)

      Cynthia D. McCauley

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01314.x

  2. Focal Article

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    1. Why Is Performance Management Broken? (pages 146–164)

      ELAINE D. PULAKOS and RYAN S. O’LEARY

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01315.x

  3. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    1. A Macro Perspective to Micro Issues (pages 165–168)

      DEVASHEESH P. BHAVE and STÉPHANE BRUTUS

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01316.x

    2. Problems and Remedies in Performance Management: A Federal-Sector Perspective (pages 169–172)

      ANNE F. MARRELLI

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01317.x

    3. Accountability Is Key to Effective Performance Appraisal Systems (pages 173–175)

      ROBERT E. LEWIS

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01318.x

    4. Improving Performance Management: Take My Golf Game, Please! (pages 176–178)

      NEIL M. A. HAUENSTEIN

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01319.x

    5. Why Performance Management Will Remain Broken: Authoritarian Communication (pages 179–181)

      ROBERT G. JONES and SATORIS S. CULBERTSON

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01320.x

    6. Performance Management Fundamentals (pages 182–183)

      GARY BRUMBACK

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01321.x

    7. Performance Management: Process Perfection or Process Utility? (pages 184–187)

      EDWARD M. MONE, BENNETT PRICE and CHRISTINA EISINGER

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01322.x

    8. Technology Is Transforming the Nature of Performance Management (pages 188–189)

      STEVEN T. HUNT

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01323.x

    9. The Puzzle of Performance Management in the Multinational Enterprise (pages 190–193)

      WAYNE F. CASCIO

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01324.x

    10. What Performance Management Needs Is a Good Theory: A Behavioral Perspective (pages 194–197)

      DONALD A. HANTULA

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01325.x

    11. From Elusive to Obvious: Improving Performance Management Through Specificity (pages 198–200)

      KATHERINE A. FREAR and SAMANTHA C. PAUSTIAN-UNDERDAHL

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01326.x

    12. Supportive Feedback Environments Can Mend Broken Performance Management Systems (pages 201–203)

      JASON J. DAHLING and ALISON L. O’MALLEY

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01327.x

    13. Manage Employee Engagement to Manage Performance (pages 204–207)

      ALAN M. SAKS and JAMIE A. GRUMAN

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01328.x

  4. Response From Authors

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    1. Managing Performance Through the Manager–Employee Relationship (pages 208–214)

      RYAN S. O’LEARY and ELAINE D. PULAKOS

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01329.x

  5. Focal Article

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    1. Overqualified Employees: Making the Best of a Potentially Bad Situation for Individuals and Organizations (pages 215–232)

      BERRIN ERDOGAN, TALYA N. BAUER, JOSÉ MARÍA PEIRÓ and DONALD M. TRUXILLO

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01330.x

  6. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    1. A Labor Economic Perspective on Overqualification (pages 233–235)

      DANIEL C. FELDMAN and DOUGLAS C. MAYNARD

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01331.x

    2. Objective and Subjective Overqualification: Distinctions, Relationships, and a Place for Each in the Literature (pages 236–239)

      MARK A. MALTARICH, GREG REILLY and ANTHONY J. NYBERG

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01332.x

    3. Overqualified Job Applicants: We Still Need Predictive Models (pages 240–242)

      SAUL FINE and BARUCH NEVO

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01333.x

    4. A Multilevel Approach to Understanding Employee Overqualification (pages 243–246)

      MARY JANE SIERRA

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01334.x

    5. Overqualified Employees: Perspectives of Older Workers (pages 247–249)

      KENNETH S. SHULTZ, DEBORAH A. OLSON and MO WANG

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01335.x

    6. Overqualified as a Euphemism for Too Old? (pages 250–251)

      LISA M. FINKELSTEIN

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01336.x

    7. Implications of Overqualification for Work–Family Conflict: Bringing Too Much to the Table? (pages 252–255)

      SATORIS S. CULBERTSON, MAURA J. MILLS and ANN H. HUFFMAN

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01337.x

    8. Overqualified Women: What Can Be Done About This Potentially Bad Situation? (pages 256–259)

      ALEKSANDRA LUKSYTE and CHRISTIANE SPITZMUELLER

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01338.x

  7. Response From Authors

    1. Top of page
    2. Introduction
    3. Focal Article
    4. Commentaries
    5. Response From Authors
    6. Focal Article
    7. Commentaries
    8. Response From Authors
    1. Overqualification Theory, Research, and Practice: Things That Matter (pages 260–267)

      BERRIN ERDOGAN, TALYA N. BAUER, JOSÉ MARÍA PEIRÓ and DONALD M. TRUXILLO

      Version of Record online: 6 MAY 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01339.x

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION