SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • A(H1N1)pdm09;
  • Korea;
  • reassortment;
  • surveillance;
  • swine influenza virus

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information

Background

Human-to-swine transmission of the pandemic H1N1 2009 [A(H1N1)pdm09] virus in pig populations resulted in reassortment events with endemic swine influenza viruses worldwide.

Objective

We investigated whether A(H1N1)pdm09-derived reassortant viruses are present in South Korea and sought to determine the pathogenic potential of the novel swine viruses.

Methods

Pig lung tissues were collected from commercially slaughtered pigs. Isolated swine influenza viruses were genetically analyzed and characterized in vitro and in vivo.

Results

We identified reassortant H3N2 (H3N2pM-like) and H3N1 swine viruses containing A(H1N1)pdm09-like segments in Korean pigs that are genetically closely related to strains recently detected in pigs and humans in North America. Although the H3N2pM-like and novel H3N1 reassortants demonstrated efficient replication in mice and ferrets, all the H3N1 strains exhibited growth advantage over the representative H3N2pM-like virus in human airway cells. Interestingly, A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1) and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1) reassortants were more readily transmitted to respiratory-droplet-contact ferrets compared with the H3N2pM-like (A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012) isolate. Furthermore, serologic evaluation showed poor antigenicity to contemporary reference human seasonal H3N2 vaccine strains.

Conclusions

We report here for the first time the isolation of H3N2pM-like viruses outside North America and of novel reassortant swine H3N1 viruses with A(H1N1)pdm09-derived genes. Apart from further complicating the genetic diversity of influenza A viruses circulating in domestic pigs, our data also indicate that these strains could potentially pose threat to public health asserting the need for continuous virus monitoring in these ecologically important hosts.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information

The zoonotic transfer and efficient global spread of a novel reassortant influenza A H1N1 virus in 2009 represent the most extensive human dissemination of a swine-origin virus and perhaps provide the most compelling evidence of the importance of pigs in their genetic evolution and ecology. The pandemic H1N1 2009 [A(H1N1)pdm09] virus, possessing a unique mixture of segments from Eurasian avian-like swine (NA, M) and a North American-like triple-reassortant (human-lineage HA/NA/PB1, avian-lineage PB2/PA, and swine-lineage NP/NS segments) H1 swine viruses,[1, 2] have been also detected in various swine herds worldwide shortly after its rapid global spread in humans.[3] With the segmented nature of the viral genome, pigs could promote genetic reassortment of viruses from various hosts and lineages in a co-infected host, re-igniting concerns for the generation of novel strains more virulent than the parental precursors.

By the end of 2009, A(H1N1)pdm09-derived reassortant viruses were already isolated in North American pigs.[4] Since then, various swine A(H1N1)pdm09-like reassortants were additionally identified in Asia,[5-9] Europe[10-12] and the Americas,[13-16] where most of those detected in the United States consistently contained the A(H1N1)pdm09 matrix (pM) gene.[4] More recently though, genetically related novel triple-reassortant H3N2 swine viruses containing the pM gene were predominantly found in North American pigs (termed H3N2pM)[16] and were also alarmingly causing human infections [termed ‘A(H3N2)v’],[17] implying their potential threat to public health.

In the present study, we examined whether the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus remain in circulation among Korean pigs since its first detection here in December 2009[17] and determined its genetic impact on the generation of novel swine viruses. We report here for the first time the emergence of H3N2pM-like viruses outside North America and the characterization of novel reassortant swine H3N1 viruses isolated in lung tissue samples collected from a pig slaughterhouse in Chungcheongbuk-do, Republic of Korea. We provide evidence on the capacity of these reassortant viruses to establish infection and efficient transmission in ferret models, suggesting their potential to cause human infections.

Materials and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information

Virus isolation and growth

Viruses in this study were isolated from Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells infected with supernatants of homogenized swine lung tissues collected from clinically healthy, market-aged (≥5 months old) pigs for commercial slaughter from May 2011 through April 2012 (Table S1). All pigs came from different swine farms of Chungcheong Province, Republic of Korea.[18] Viral growth was determined by monitoring cytopathic changes in cells and confirmed by hemagglutinin assay using 0·5% turkey RBC (tRBC). Positive samples were plaque purified and additionally grown in MDCK cells.

Growth characteristics in culture were compared by inoculating MDCK cells with multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0·001 and lung epithelial (A549) or primary normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells with MOI of 0·1. Infectious cell culture supernatants were collected at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection (pi). Fifty-percent tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) of stock viruses, nasal washes, tissue homogenates, and supernatants were endpoint-titrated in MDCK cells by the Reed and Muench method[19] with results expressed as log10TCID50 per milliliter (ml) or per gram (g) of tissue, respectively. The limit of virus detection was 0·7 log10TCID50 per unit sample tested. Student's t-test was used for statistical comparisons; threshold of significance was set at < 0·05 (Graph Pad Prism™ ver. 6, San Diego, CA, USA).

Genomic sequencing and phylogenetic and analyses

Viral RNA was extracted from cell culture isolates using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). RT-PCR and full-genome sequencing were carried out under standard conditions using influenza-specific primers as previously described.[18] DNA sequences were compiled and edited using DNAStar's Lasergene sequence analysis software package version 5.0 (Madison, WI, USA). Multiple sequences were aligned using Clustal_X[20], while rooted phylograms were prepared and plotted with the neighbor-joining (NJ) plot program.[21] Phylogenetic trees were constructed by aligning full-length gene sequences of our swine isolates with those of reference sequences from human and genetically related animal influenza viruses available in GenBank identified through the basic local alignment search tool. Isolates were assigned with GenBank accession numbers KC471342KC471493.

Animal studies

Groups of 22 5- to 6-week-old female BALB/c mice (weighing ≥18 g) (Samtaco, Seoul, Republic of Korea) were inoculated intranasally with 105 TCID50/30 μl of designated virus. For each infection group, three mice were sacrificed on 1, 3, 5, and 7 dpi for lung viral titrations; the remaining ten mice were monitored daily up to 14 days for morbidity and mortality. A cutoff value was set to ≥25% for weight losses in which mice will be euthanized.

Groups of two 14- to 16 week-old female outbred ferrets (Mustela putorius furo, Wuxi Sangosho Pet Park Co., Ltd., China) that were seronegative by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and NP ELISA assays for influenza A virus exposure/infection were inoculated intranasally with 105·5 TCID50/ml of each field virus isolate. At 1 dpi, two contact ferrets were added to the other half of the cage containing one of the inoculated ferrets separated by two stainless steel grids (at 35 mm apart) allowing respiratory-droplet (RD) transmission without direct contact. Signs of morbidity (e.g., weight, temperature, sneezing) and mortality were monitored daily for 14 days. Each test group consisted of two infected and two RD-contacts. Viral growth at the upper respiratory tract was determined by collecting nasal washes in alternate days at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 dpi (inoculated) or daily up to 12 dpi (RD-contacts) and. One additional ferret was infected with each virus and humanely euthanized at 3 dpi for virus detection in various tissues (trachea, lung, spleen, intestine, and brain).

Blood samples were collected from mice and ferrets before infection and at 16–18 dpi for HI assays using tRBCs according to standard methods.[22] Animal experiments were performed in a BSL3+ containment facility approved by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention following general animal care guidelines required by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungbuk National University.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information

Phylogenetic and genetic characterization of novel reassortant H3 viruses

Of 1,152 tissue samples collected, 19 isolates (1·6%) were recovered and subtyped as H1N1 (n = 5), H1N2 (n = 2), H3N1 (n = 4), or H3N2 (n = 8) (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis of each segment of the five H1N1 and two H1N2 swine viruses revealed that they are descendants of the A(H1N1)pdm09 and pre-existing Korean H1N2 viruses, respectively, without any indication of genetic reassortment (Figures 1, S1). In contrast to the intact H1 viruses, our H3 isolates had a more complex genetic combination. The HA of the four H3N1 isolates grouped together with contemporary cluster IV H3 viruses in North America, which also include the H3N2pM and A(H3N2)v viruses (Figure 1B). The PB1 of A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012(H3N1), PB1/NP/NS of A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1), and PB1/NS of A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1) appeared to be derived from North American-lineage triple-reassortant H3N2 strains, while the other segments are A(H1N1)pdm09-like. Similarly, all the remaining seven segments of A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012(H3N1) were grouped within A(H1N1)pdm09-like viruses (Table 1 and Figure S1).

Table 1. Genotypes of identified A(H1N1)pdm09-like, H1N2, and reassortant H3 swine influenza viruses
IsolateSubtypeIsolationGenotypeStock titersMLD50
HANAPB2PB1PANPMNS(TCID50/ml)
  1. Black and gray cells indicate segments of A(H1N1)pdm09 and triple-reassortant virus origin, respectively. The MLD50s of a representative H3N2pM-like and the novel H3N1 reassortants are shown. ND, not determined.

A/swine/Korea/CY11-01/2011H1N111/21/2011        4·0E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY11-02/2011H1N111/21/2011        2·0E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY12-03/2011H1N212/5/2011        6·3E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY01-04/2012H1N11/2/2012        4·0E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY01-05/2012H1N11/2/2012        1·0E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY01-06/2012H1N11/16/2012        6·3E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012H3N12/7/2012        6·3E+07> 6·0
A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012H3N12/7/2012        6·3E+07> 6·0
A/swine/Korea/CY02-09/2012H3N22/7/2012        2·0E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012H3N22/20/2012        1·0E+06> 6·0
A/swine/Korea/CY03-11/2012H1N23/6/2012        2·0E+07ND
A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012H3N13/6/2012        1·0E+08> 6·0
A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012H3N13/6/2012        4·0E+07> 6·0
A/swine/Korea/CY03-14/2012H3N23/6/2012        4·0E+05ND
A/swine/Korea/CY03-15/2012H3N23/6/2012        1·0E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY03-16/2012H3N23/27/2012        1·0E+05ND
A/swine/Korea/CY03-17/2012H3N23/27/2012        2·0E+05ND
A/swine/Korea/CY03-18/2012H3N23/27/2012        1·0E+06ND
A/swine/Korea/CY03-19/2012H3N23/27/2012        2·0E+05ND
image

Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees based on the full-length gene sequences of the HA (A, B) and NA (C, D) segments of A(H1N1)pdm09 (*), H1N2 (§), and reassortant H3N1 (†) and H3N2pM-like (‡) viruses in this study. Antigenic clusters of H1 (A) and H3 (B) viruses of the North American swine lineage are indicated. Scale represents the number of substitutions per nucleotide. Branch labels record the stability of the branches over 100 bootstrap replicates. Only bootstrap values >60% are shown. Viruses in boldface are the isolates in this study, whereas underlined strains were used for pathogenesis and transmission studies.

Download figure to PowerPoint

For the H3N2 isolates, phylogeny of the M genes demonstrated that they were A(H1N1)pdm09-like, whereas all their remaining segments were triple-reassortant swine virus-derived (Figure S1E). Thus, our reassortant H3N2 isolates bear similar genetic constellation as the recent H3N2pM and A(H3N2)v viruses in the United States.[16, 17] It is interesting to note that the HA gene of A/swine/KoreaCY02-09/2012(H3N2) was more closely related to the H3N1 strains rather than to the other H3N2pM-like isolates (99·8–100 versus 98·9–99·5% nucleotide sequence homologies) (Figure 1B). Furthermore, the pM segments of the novel H3N1 isolates were also separately clustered. A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012(H3N1) and A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012(H3N1) grouped together with the Korean H3N2pM-like viruses, while A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1) and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1) appeared to be more closely related to A(H1N1)pdm09-like isolates in this report clustering under a human strain in Korea (A/Daejeon/1840/2009); average sequence identity between these clusters of pM segments is 98·7% (Figure S1E). Overall, phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that the H3 influenza viruses isolated here are reassortant strains between A(H1N1)pdm09-like and triple-reassortant H3N2-like viruses.

Virological assessment of H3N2pM-like and novel H3N1 reassortants in vitro and in mice

Replication kinetics of the H3N2pM-like (A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012) and novel H3N1 (A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012, A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012, A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012, and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012) reassortants were assessed in vitro. Titration of infectious viruses released in infected cell culture supernatants showed comparable replication efficiency of all viruses in MDCK cells, although A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012(H3N2) demonstrated slightly delayed growth kinetics reaching peak titers at 72 hpi (Figure 2A). In NHBE cells, the novel H3N1 reassortants produced at least 100-fold higher peak titers (< 0·05) than the H3N2pM-like virus suggesting their more efficient replication in this human airway cell line. No variable growth kinetics was observed in A549 cells where all viruses moderately replicated.

image

Figure 2. Growth capacity of novel swine viruses in culture (A) and pathogenicity in mice (B-C). (A) Comparative growth curves of the H3N2pM (represented by A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012) and novel H3N1 reassortants in MDCK, NHBE, and A549 cells. Virus endpoint titers are expressed as mean log10TCID50/ml from three independent assays (* < 0·05). (B) Pathogenicity was assessed in groups of 22 mice inoculated intranasally with the indicated viruses. Three mice from each group were sacrificed on days indicated for lung viral titrations expressed as mean log10TCID50/g ± SD. The remaining ten mice were observed for morbidity and mortality (C).

Download figure to PowerPoint

All tested swine H3 isolates proliferated in mice lungs without pre-adaptation. However, only three H3N1 viruses (A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012, A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012, A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012) persisted up to 7 dpi where A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1) consistently produced the highest lung titers (Figure 2B). Moreover, none of the isolates induced any remarkable signs of morbidity (as indicated by <2% weight losses) nor caused death within 14 days of infection (MLD50s>6·0) (Figure 2C and Table 1).

Pathogenesis and transmission of H3 viruses in ferrets

In general, all ferrets inoculated with the H3N2pM-like and H3N1 isolates exhibited mild-to-moderate signs of influenza disease that were indistinguishable between groups as indicated by mild lethargy, mean maximum weight losses of 6·5–8·5%, and elevated temperatures of up to 2·1°C (Table S2). Sneezing was observed at peak times of viral shedding (1-3 dpi), but was more frequent in groups infected with A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1), A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1), and A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012(H3N2) viruses. All H3N1 isolates replicated efficiently in the upper respiratory tract producing high peak viral titers (≥5·4 log10TCID50/ml), but only A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1) and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1) persisted in nasal washes collected up to 5 dpi. On the other hand, A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012(H3N2)-infected ferrets had relatively lower titers (4·2 log10TCID50/ml mean peak titer) compared with the H3N1-infected groups although shedding also continued until 5 dpi (Figure 3A–E). Among the H3N1 strains, A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012, A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012, and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012 were detected in tracheal tissues (at titers 3·3, 2·3, and 4 log10TCID50/g, respectively) collected at 3 dpi, whereas only A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012 and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012 were additionally recovered in harvested lung tissue samples (at titers 3·6 and 5·3 log10TCID50/g, respectively) (Figure 3F). In contrast, A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012(H3N2) could not produce titers beyond the limit of detection. No infectious virus was recovered in any of the other tissue samples (spleen intestine, brain) tested.

image

Figure 3. Replication and respiratory-droplet transmission in ferrets. Groups of two ferrets inoculated with the H3N2pM-like and H3N1 swine isolates were paired individually adjacent to RD-contact ferrets at 1 dpi (A–E). Nasal wash titers are shown for individual ferrets (§, seroconversion of RD-contacts at 17 dpe by HI assays). One additional ferret for each group was inoculated and humanely euthanized at 3 dpi (†) for virus titration in various tissues (F). Virus titers in nasal washes and homogenized tissues are expressed as log10TCID50/ml or g tissue collected with the limit of virus detection set at 0·7 log10TCID50/ml or g.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Exposure to A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1) and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1) resulted to positive detection in nasal washes of both RD-contacts as early as 2 days post-exposure (dpe) with 5·5 and 5·3 log10TCID50/ml mean peak titers, respectively (Table S2 and Figure 3A). In contrast, the H3N2pM-like virus exhibited delayed transmission kinetics requiring 4-5 dpe for detection in all RD-contacts (4·8 log10TCID50/ml mean peak titers). Despite negative detection, seroconversion was evident in both RD-contacts of A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012(H3N1) at 17 dpe (Table S2), but not in the A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012(H3N1) RD-contact group, suggesting impaired aerosol transmission.

Antigenic cross-reactivity against human seasonal and swine H3N2 viruses

Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of individual virus segments did not reveal notable markers for virulence and pathogenicity previously described.[23] Although our H3 isolates, except A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012(H3N1), are predicted to possess a 90-amino acid PB1-F2 protein, none possess the Ser-66 virulence marker. The H3 HA1 region showed consensus residues at sites known for receptor-binding (226-Val and 228-Ser), which have become common among North American H3N2 swine viruses.[16, 17] Non-synonymous amino acid differences in each of the predicted antigenic epitopes relative to recent human seasonal and three earlier clusters of triple-reassortant swine H3N2 viruses in North America were noted while a Ser-266-Thr substitution near antigenic site E2 was shared by all our H3 isolates (data not shown).

Using ferret antisera obtained from animals experimentally infected with the H3N2pM-like and H3N1 isolates, antigenic cross-reactivity was not observed against the A/California/04/2009(H1N1) virus when evaluated by HI assays. Antigenicity against homologous viruses was high (at 1280-2560 HI titers) but was slightly lower between the H3N2pM-like and H3N1 isolates (at 640 HI units) perhaps due to the heterosubtypic NAs. Additionally, the A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012(H3N2) ferret antisera demonstrated 1280 HI titers against A/swine/Korea/CY02-09/2012(H3N2), suggesting that the two H3N2pM-like virus clusters (Figure 1B) are not antigenically divergent. However, the three ancestral clusters of triple-reassortant swine H3N2 viruses (represented by A/swine/Korea/CAN04/2005, A/swine//Korea/CAS05/2004, A/swine/Korea/CY07/2007) demonstrated low-to-moderate cross-reactivities (40-160 HI titers), whereas no evident antigenic reaction was observed against A/Brisbane/10/2007 and A/Perth/16/2009 (Table 2) indicating antigenic divergence.

Table 2. Immunologic cross-reactivities of ferret-raised H3 antisera against panel of influenza A viruses
VirusesSubtypeFerret antisera
A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/12A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/12A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/12A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/12A/Perth/16/2009
  1. *Human seasonal H3N2 virus; prototype cluster I (**), II (***), III (†) H3 swine viruses are represented. Titers in boldface represent homologous virus reactivity.

A/California/04/2009H1N1<20<20<20<20<20<20
A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012H3N1 2560 256025602560640<20
A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012H3N12560 2560 25602560640<20
A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012H3N125602560 2560 2560640<20
A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012H3N1256025602560 2560 640<20
A/swine/Korea/CY02-09/2012H3N26406406406401280<20
A/swine/Korea/CY02-10/2012H3N2640640640640 1280 <20
A/Brisbane/10/2007*H3N2<20<20<20<20<2040
A/Perth/16/2009*H3N2<20<20<20<20<20 1280
A/swine/Korea/CAN04/2005**H3N24080404020<20
A/swine//Korea/CAS05/2004***H3N21601608080160<20
A/swine/Korea/CY07/2007H3N28080404040<20

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information

In this study, we show that A(H1N1)pdm 09-like viruses remain in circulation among swine herds of Korea, providing opportunities to undergo reassortment with currently circulating animal influenza viruses. Indeed, A(H1N1)pdm09-derived H1N2 reassortants were isolated in 2010 bearing N2 segments from pre-existing Korean H1N2 swine strains.[6] Meanwhile, H1N2 isolates in the present study appear to be intact Korean swine viruses without any indications of genetic reassortment. Some gilts in Korea are imported from North America[24] prompting speculations that North American triple-reassortant swine viruses were introduced into Korean pigs through importation of infected but asymptomatic pigs.[25] We now report the isolation of H3N2pM-like and novel H3N1 reassortants carrying various combination of A(H1N1)pdm09- and triple-reassortant H3N2-derived segments that are more closely related to North American isolates rather than from swine viruses previously isolated in Korea.[26]

Swine H3N1 viruses with the triple-reassortant gene cascade have been isolated in the United States[27, 28] and the Republic of Korea.[29] However, the identification of A(H1N1)pdm09-derived H3N1 viruses with these particular gene constellations has never been reported elsewhere, including the United States. At present, it is unknown when and where these H3 reassortants were generated and whether genetically similar or other reassortant strains are present in different regions of the Korean Peninsula. It is possible that co-infection of A(H1N1)pdm09 and previously undetected triple-reassortant H3N2 viruses in pigs facilitated reassortment. Considering that the M genes of A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1) and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1) demonstrated closer relationship to local A(H1N1)pdm09 strains, it is tempting to speculate that reassortment events may have occurred in domestic pigs of Korea. Furthermore, some viral segments of our H3 isolates, such as HA, do not phylogenetically form a single lineage possibly suggesting independent introductions or short-term evolution following reassortment of viral ancestors.

Infection of reassortant H3 viruses did not induce severe clinical disease in mice and ferrets. Three H3N1 isolates (A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012, A/swine/Korea/CY02-08/2012, and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012) persisted longer in mice lungs, whereas A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1) and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1) exhibited tropism for lung and tracheal tissues epitomizing the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.[30] We also observed that all tested viruses could grow well in cultured NHBE cells. Such results correlate to their efficient replication in the upper respiratory tract of ferrets, suggesting their ability to infect cells of the human upper respiratory airway. Consistently though, the H3N1 reassortants produced higher viral titers in such cells and in ferret nasal washes than the H3N2pM-like virus.

It has been proposed that the pM segment is a determinant of the aerosol transmission and zoonotic potential of H3N2pM viruses.[16] Our results show that the H3N2pM-like isolate was transmitted to RD-contact ferrets with kinetics commensurate to genetically related 2011 A(H3N2)v human viruses.[31] Of the four novel H3N1 reassortants, only A/swine/Korea/CY02-07/2012(H3N1) and A/swine/Korea/CY03-13/2012(H3N1) transmitted more readily in naïve RD-contacts despite evident growth in ferrets lungs. The balance between HA-NA activities have been shown to confer RD transmission of the A(H1N1)pdm09 virus in ferrets.[32] Therefore, acquisition of the H3-HA would consequently perturb stability and alter transmission kinetics as exemplified by A/swine/Korea/CY03-12/2012(H3N1). However, results generated here indicated that the presence of H3N2-derived PB1, NP, and NS segments do not essentially impair aerosol dissemination. Given their importance in viral replication and virulence, it is probable that these segments played significant roles in the observed RD transmission. More importantly, our serologic results and of others[33, 34] clearly showed that our reassortant H3 isolates are antigenically divergent from recent human seasonal H3N2 strains. Therefore, previous exposure to or immunization with trivalent influenza vaccines may not elicit protective immunity against infection from these novel H3 viruses.

We have shown here that the H3N2pM-like and novel reassortant H3N1 isolates could potentially establish infection and transmission in ferrets, a recognized model for human influenza infection and transmissibility, presenting concerns for human health risks. Although H3N2pM-like viruses appear to be more commonly isolated in this report, such predominance over the H3N1 reassortants remains to be seen. All these strains could still be displaced by more dominant viruses in the field. Due to continuous movement of pigs, it may not also be too surprising to find H3N2 swine viruses outside North America bearing gene constellation similar to the H3N2pM and 2011 A(H3N2)v strains. However, their increased prevalence and dissemination across continents would be notably important given their potential threat to public health. Furthermore, their establishment would certainly complicate further the genetic diversity of swine influenza viruses in Korea. Thus, our report asserts the need for continuous vigilance on the evolution of influenza viruses in this ecologically significant reservoir for the detection of emergent novel strains with potential threat to animal and human populations.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information

This work was supported by a grant from the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project (Grant No.: A103001) by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea. We thank Bioleaders Corporation (Daejeon, Republic of Korea) for the conduct of experiments at their BSL3+ containment facility.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information
  • 1
    Garten RJ, Davis CT, Russell CA et al. Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science 2009; 325:197201.
  • 2
    Trifonov V, Khiabanian H, Greenbaum B, Rabadan R: The origin of the recent swine influenza A(H1N1) virus infecting humans. Euro Surveill 2009; 14: pii: 19193.
  • 3
    Choi YK, Pascua PN, Song MS. Swine influenza viruses: an Asian perspective. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2012; 370:147172.
  • 4
    Ducatez MF, Hause B, Stigger-Rosser E et al. Multiple reassortment between pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and endemic influenza viruses in pigs, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2011; 17:16241629.
  • 5
    Vijaykrishna D, Poon LL, Zhu HC et al. Reassortment of pandemic H1N1/2009 influenza A virus in swine. Science 2010; 328:1529.
  • 6
    Han JY, Park SJ, Kim HK et al. Identification of reassortant pandemic H1N1 influenza virus in Korean pigs. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 22:699707.
  • 7
    Fan X, Zhu H, Zhou B et al. Emergence and dissemination of a swine H3N2 reassortant influenza virus with 2009 pandemic H1N1 genes in pigs in China. J Virol 2012; 86:23752378.
  • 8
    Zhu H, Zhou B, Fan X et al. Novel reassortment of Eurasian avian-like and pandemic/2009 influenza viruses in swine: infectious potential for humans. J Virol 2011; 85:1043210439.
  • 9
    Hiromoto Y, Parchariyanon S, Ketusing N et al. Isolation of the Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus and its reassortant with an H3N2 swine influenza virus from healthy weaning pigs in Thailand in 2011. Virus Res 2012; 169:175181.
  • 10
    Howard WA, Essen SC, Strugnell BW et al. Reassortant Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus in pigs, United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis 2011; 17:10491052.
  • 11
    Moreno A, Di TL, Faccini S et al. Novel H1N2 swine influenza reassortant strain in pigs derived from the pandemic H1N1/2009 virus. Vet Microbiol 2011; 149:472477.
  • 12
    Starick E, Lange E, Fereidouni S et al. Reassorted pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza A virus discovered from pigs in Germany. J Gen Virol 2011; 92:11841188.
  • 13
    Liu Q, Ma J, Liu H et al. Emergence of novel reassortant H3N2 swine influenza viruses with the 2009 pandemic H1N1 genes in the United States. Arch Virol 2012; 157:555562.
  • 14
    Pereda A, Rimondi A, Cappuccio J et al. Evidence of reassortment of pandemic H1N1 influenza virus in swine in Argentina: are we facing the expansion of potential epicenters of influenza emergence? Influenza Other Respi Viruses 2011; 5:409412.
  • 15
    Tremblay D, Allard V, Doyon JF et al. Emergence of a new swine H3N2 and pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza A virus reassortant in two Canadian animal populations, mink and swine. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:43864390.
  • 16
    Nelson MI, Vincent AL, Kitikoon P, Holmes EC, Gramer MR. Evolution of novel reassortant A/H3N2 influenza viruses in North American swine and humans, 2009–2011. J Virol 2012; 86:88728878.
  • 17
    Lindstrom S, Garten R, Balish A et al. Human infections with novel reassortant influenza A(H3N2)v viruses, United States, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis 2012; 18:834837.
  • 18
    Song MS, Lee JH, Pascua PN et al. Evidence of human-to-swine transmission of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus in South Korea. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48:32043211.
  • 19
    Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am J Hyg 1938; 27:493497.
  • 20
    Aiyar A. The use of CLUSTAL W and CLUSTAL X for multiple sequence alignment. Methods Mol Biol 2000; 132:221241.
  • 21
    Perriere G, Gouy M. WWW-query: an on-line retrieval system for biological sequence banks. Biochimie 1996; 78:364369.
  • 22
    Palmer DF, Dowdle WR, Coleman MT, Schild GC. Advanced laboratory techniques for influenza diagnosis. Immun Ser 1975; 6:2545.
  • 23
    Medina RA, García-Sastre A. Influenza A viruses: new research developments. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 11:590603.
  • 24
    Jung K, Chae C. Phylogenetic analysis of an H1N2 influenza A virus isolated from a pig in Korea. Brief Report. Arch Virol 2004; 149:14151422.
  • 25
    Song DS, Lee CS, Jung K et al. Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of H1N1 swine influenza virus isolated in Korea. Virus Res 2007; 125:98103.
  • 26
    Pascua PN, Song MS, Lee JH et al. Seroprevalence and genetic evolutions of swine influenza viruses under vaccination pressure in Korean swine herds. Virus Res 2008; 138:4349.
  • 27
    Lekcharoensuk P, Lager KM, Vemulapalli R et al. Novel swine influenza virus subtype H3N1, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12:787794.
  • 28
    Ma W, Gramer M, Rossow K, Yoon KJ. Isolation and genetic characterization of new reassortant H3N1 swine influenzavirus from pigs in the midwestern United States. J Virol 2006; 80:50925096.
  • 29
    Shin JY, Song MS, Lee EH et al. Isolation and characterization of novel H3N1 swine influenza viruses from pigs with respiratory diseases in Korea. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44:39233927.
  • 30
    Munster VJ, de Wit E, van den Brand JM et al. Pathogenesis and transmission of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza virus in ferrets. Science 2009; 325:481483.
  • 31
    Pearce MB, Jayaraman A, Pappas C et al. Pathogenesis and transmission of swine origin A(H3N2)v influenza viruses in ferrets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:39443949.
  • 32
    Yen HL, Liang CH, Wu CY et al. Hemagglutinin-neuraminidase balance confers respiratory-droplet transmissibility of the pandemic H1N1 influenza virus in ferrets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:1426414269.
  • 33
    Shu B, Garten R, Emery S et al. Genetic analysis and antigenic characterization of swine origin influenza viruses isolated from humans in the United States, 1990–2010. Virology 2012; 422:151160.
  • 34
    Skowronski DM, De Serres SG, Janjua NZ et al. Cross-reactive antibody to swine influenza A(H3N2) subtype virus in children and adults before and after immunisation with 2010/11 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in Canada, August to November 2010. Euro Surveill 2012; 17: pii: 20066.

Addendum

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information

Eun Hye Choi,1 Yun Hee Baek,1 Semi Kim,1 Arun G. Decano,1 Byeong-Jae Lee1.

1College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.

Supporting Information

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. Conflicts of interest
  9. References
  10. Addendum
  11. Supporting Information
FilenameFormatSizeDescription
irv12154-sup-0001-FigS1.pptxapplication/pptx150KFigure S1. Phylogenetic trees based on the full-length gene sequences of the internal gene segments of A(H1N1)pdm09 (*), H1N2 (§), and reassortant H3N1 (†) and H3N2pM-like (‡) viruses in this study (A-F).
irv12154-sup-0002-TableS1-S2.docxWord document17K

Table S1. Monthly distribution of virus isolation from swine lungs.

Table S2. Evaluation of clinical disease in experimentally inoculated ferrets.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.