Previous versions were presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the International Political Economy Society, Boston, and the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto. We would like to thank Clair Apodaca, Cullen Hendrix, and Wendy Wong for their helpful comments. Replication files are available at http://myweb.fsu.edu/dwh06c, and at URL FOR ISQ SITE
Information Politics Versus Organizational Incentives: When Are Amnesty International's ‘‘Naming and Shaming’’ Reports Biased?†
Article first published online: 19 FEB 2013
© 2013 International Studies Association
International Studies Quarterly
Volume 57, Issue 2, pages 219–232, June 2013
How to Cite
Hill, D. W., Moore, W. H. and Mukherjee, B. (2013), Information Politics Versus Organizational Incentives: When Are Amnesty International's ‘‘Naming and Shaming’’ Reports Biased?. International Studies Quarterly, 57: 219–232. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12022
- Issue published online: 18 JUN 2013
- Article first published online: 19 FEB 2013
Appendix S1. Results from alternative specifications of the OP and ZiOP regression models.
|isqu12022_sm_appendix.pdf||201K||Supporting info item|
|isqu12022_sm_appendix.tex||13K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.