The authors are grateful to Gary Kleck and anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft of this paper and to Mike Reisig for helpful suggestions at several stages in its development.
RACE, ETHNICITY, THREAT AND THE LABELING OF CONVICTED FELONS*
Article first published online: 18 AUG 2005
Volume 43, Issue 3, pages 589–622, August 2005
How to Cite
BONTRAGER, S., BALES, W. and CHIRICOS, T. (2005), RACE, ETHNICITY, THREAT AND THE LABELING OF CONVICTED FELONS. Criminology, 43: 589–622. doi: 10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00018.x
- Issue published online: 18 AUG 2005
- Article first published online: 18 AUG 2005
- concentrated disadvantage;
- social contexts;
- race and ethnicity;
- hierarchical modeling
Florida law allows judges to withhold adjudication of guilt for persons who have either pled guilty or been found guilty of a felony. This provision may apply only to persons who will be sentenced to probation, and it allows such individuals to retain all civil rights and to truthfully assert they had not been convicted of a felony. This paper examines the effects of race and Hispanic ethnicity on the withholding of adjudication for 91,477 males sentenced to probation in Florida between 1999 and 2002. Hierarchical Generalized Linear Modeling is used to assess the direct effects of defendant attributes as well as the cross-level interactions between race, ethnicity and community level indicators of threat, such as percentage black and Hispanic and concentrated disadvantage. Our results show that Hispanics and blacks are significantly less likely to have adjudication withheld when other individual and community level factors are controlled. This effect is especially pronounced for blacks and for drug offenders. Cross-level interactions show that concentrated disadvantage has a substantial effect on the adjudication withheld outcome for both black and Hispanic defendants. The implications of these results for the conceptualization of racial/ethnic threat at the individual, situational and social levels are discussed.