This paper supersedes portions of Chen's (2007b) “Perturbed Communication Games with Honest Senders and Naive Receivers” and Kartik's (2005) “Information Transmission with Almost-Cheap Talk.” We are grateful to Vince Crawford for encouraging us to write this paper and to David Eil, Sidartha Gordon, Sjaak Hurkens, Melody Lo, John Morgan, various seminar audiences, and three anonymous referees for comments. We thank Steve Matthews for making available an old working paper of his. For advice and support related to this research, Chen and Kartik are indebted to their respective dissertation supervisors David Pearce, Stephen Morris, and Dino Gerardi (Chen), and Doug Bernheim and Steve Tadelis (Kartik). For financial support, Kartik and Sobel thank the National Science Foundation, and Sobel also thanks the Guggenheim Foundation and the Secretaría de Estado de Universidades e Investigación del Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Spain). For hospitality and administrative support, Kartik is grateful to the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, and Sobel is grateful to the Departament d'Economia i d'Història Econòmica and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Selecting Cheap-Talk Equilibria
Article first published online: 19 FEB 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.0012-9682.2008.00819.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Chen, Y., Kartik, N. and Sobel, J. (2008), Selecting Cheap-Talk Equilibria. Econometrica, 76: 117–136. doi: 10.1111/j.0012-9682.2008.00819.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 FEB 2008
- Article first published online: 19 FEB 2008
- Manuscript received March, 2007; final revision received October, 2007.
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Cheap talk;
- babbling;
- equilibrium selection;
- almost-cheap talk
There are typically multiple equilibrium outcomes in the Crawford–Sobel (CS) model of strategic information transmission. This paper identifies a simple condition on equilibrium payoffs, called NITS (no incentive to separate), that selects among CS equilibria. Under a commonly used regularity condition, only the equilibrium with the maximal number of induced actions satisfies NITS. We discuss various justifications for NITS, including perturbed cheap-talk games with nonstrategic players or costly lying. We also apply NITS to other models of cheap talk, illustrating its potential beyond the CS framework.

1468-0262/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=2354090f3c3edb76f7671a0522004359de7605e9)
1468-0262/asset/ECTA_centre.gif?v=1&s=0033482be8fb6a261a39223ed9b6d1ddf8b0bbea)
