SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Adler, F. R., and J. Mosquera. 2000. Is space necessary? Interference competition and limits to biodiversity. Ecology 81:32263232.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Borgia, G. 1979. Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. pp. 1950 in M. S.Blum and N. A.Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York .
  • Christiansen, F. B. 1974. Sufficient conditions for protected polymorphism in a subdivided population. Am. Nat. 108:157166.
  • Christiansen, F. B. 1975. Hard and soft selection in a subdivided population. Am. Nat. 109:1116.
  • Christiansen, F. B., and M. W. Feldman. 1975. Subdivided populations: a review of the one- and two-locus deterministic theory. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7:1338.
  • Clark, D. C., S. J. DeBano, and A. J. Moor. 1997. The influence of environmental quality on sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea (Dictyoptera:Blaberidae). Behav. Ecol. 8:4653.
  • David, P., T. Bjorksten, K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2000. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalkeyed flies. Nature 406:186188.
  • Day, T. 2000. Sexual selection and the evolution of costly female preferences: spatial effects. Evolution 54:715730.
  • de Meeûs, T., and J. Goudet. 2000. Adaptive diversity in heterogeneous environments for populations regulated by a mixture of soft and hard selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2:981995.
  • de Meeûs, T., Y. Michalakis, F. Renaud, and I. Olivier. 1993. Polymorphism in heterogeneous environments, evolution of habitat selection and sympatric speciation: soft and hard selection models. Evol. Ecol. 7:175198.
  • Dempster, E. R. 1955. Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20:2532.
  • Dobzhansky, T. H. 1940. Speciation as a astage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74:312321.
  • Dobzhansky, T. H. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. 3rd ed. Columbia Univ. Press, New York .
  • Droney, D. C. 1992. Sexual selection in lekking Hawaiian Drosophila: the roles of male competition and female choice in male mating success. Anim. Behav. 44:10071020.
  • Droney, D. C. 1996. Environmental influences on male courtship and implications for female choice in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 51:821830.
  • Endler, J. A., and A. L. Basolo. 1998. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:415420.
  • Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals Evolution 35:124138.
  • Garcia-Dorado, A. 1986. The effect of niche preference on polymorphism protection in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 40:936945.
  • Gavrilets, S. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403:886889.
  • Geritz, S. A. H., E. Kisdi, G. Meszena, and J. A. J. Metz. 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12:3557.
  • Hamilton, W. D., and M. Zuk. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites Science 218:384387.
  • Hill, G. E. 1995. Ornamental traits as indicators of environmental health. Bioscience 45:2431.
  • Hoekstra, R. F., R. Bijlsma, and A. J. Dolman. 1985. Polymorphism from environmental heterogeneity: models are only robust if the heterozygote is close in fitness to the favored homozygote in each environment. Genet. Res. 45:299314.
  • Holt, R. D. 1996. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories on senescence and niche conservatism. Evol. Ecol. 10:111.
  • Howard, R. D., H. H. Whiteman, and T. I. Schueller. 1994. Sexual selection in American toads: a test of a good-genes hypothesis. Evolution 48:12861300.
  • Iwasa, Y., A. Pomiankowski, and S. Nee. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The “handicap” principle. Evolution 45:14311442.
  • Janetos, A. C. 1980. Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7:107112.
  • Jia, F. Y., M. D. Greenfield, and R. D. Collins. 2000. Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype X environment interaction. Evolution 54:953967.
  • Johnson, P. A., F. C. Hoppensteadt, J. J. Smith, and G. L. Bush. 1996. Conditions for sympatric speciation: a diploid model incorporating habitat fidelity and non-habitat assortative mating. Evol. Ecol. 10:187205.
  • Johnstone, R. A., and A. Grafen. 1992. Error-prone signalling. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 248:229233.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:16491655.
  • Kirkpatrick, M., and N. H. Barton. 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94:12821286.
  • Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 250:3338.
  • Kirkpatrick, M., and M. R. Servedio. 1999. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 151:865884.
  • Kisdi, E. 2001. Long-term adaptive diversity in Levene-type models. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:721727.
  • Kisdi, E., and S. A. H. Geritz. 1999. Adaptive dynamics in allele space: evolution of genetic polymorphism by small mutations in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution 53:9931008.
  • Kotiaho, J. S., L. W. Simmons, and J. L. Tomkins. 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410:684686.
  • Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78:37213725.
  • Lande, R. 1982. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36:213223.
  • Leibowitz, A., M. Santos, and A. Fontdevila. 1995. Heritability and selection on body-size in a natural-population of Drosophila buzzatii. Genetics 141:181189.
  • Levene, H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87:331333.
  • Luttbeg, B. 1994. Acomparative bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice. Behav. Ecol. 7:451460.
  • Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. American Naturalist 100:637650.
  • Maynard Smith, J. 1991. Theories of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:146151.
  • Maynard Smith, J., and T. Hoekstra. 1980. Polymorphism in a varied environment: How robust are the models Genet. Res. 35:4557.
  • Merkel, G. 1977. The effects of temperature and food quality on the larval developmnet of Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Oecologia 30:129140.
  • Meszena, G., I. Czibula, and S. Geritz. 1997. Adaptive dynamics in a 2-patch environment: a toy model for allopatric and parapatric speciation. J. Biol. Syst. 5:265284.
  • Møller, A. P. 1990. Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim. Behav. 40:11851187.
  • Muller, H. J. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71125.
  • Nei, M., T. Maruyama, and C. I. Wu. 1983. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics 103:557579.
  • Noor, M. A. F. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503508.
  • O'Donald, P. 1980. Genetic models of sexual selection. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge , U.K. .
  • Partridge, L. 1980. Mate choice increases a component of fitness in fruitflies. Nature 283:290291.
  • Pomiankowski, A., and A. P. Møller. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260:2129.
  • Proulx, S. R. 1999. Matings systems and the evolution of the niche. Am. Nat. 154:8998.
  • Rausher, M. D. 1984. The evolution of habitat preference in subdivided populations. Evolution 38:596608.
  • Reynolds, J. D., and M. R. Gross. 1990. Costs and benefits of female mate choice: Is there a lek paradox Am. Nat. 136:230243.
  • Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:14151421.
  • Ryan, M. J. 1990. Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:157195.
  • Servedio, M. R. 2000. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 54:2129.
  • Simchuk, A. P., A. V. Ivashov, and V. A. Companiytsev. 1999. Genetic patterns as possible factors causing population cycles in oak leafroller moth, Tortrix viridana L. For. Ecol. Manage. 113:3549.
  • Simmons, L. W. 1987. Heritability of a male character chosen by females of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21:129133.
  • Spirito, F., and F. Sampogna. 1995. Conditions for the maintenance of prezygotic and zygotic isolation in a continent-island model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 48:235250.
  • Taylor, P. D., and G. C. Williams. 1982. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22:392409.
  • Templeton, A. R., and E. D. Rothman. 1981. Evolution in fine grained environments. II. Habitat selection as a homeostatic mechanism. Theor. Popul. Biol. 19:326340.
  • Tomlinson, I. P. M. 1989. Models of clines in sexual selection by female choice. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 36:331348.
  • Van Tienderen, P. H. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45:13171331.