SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Adams, W. T., and D. S. Birkes. 1991. Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. Pp. 157172 in S.Fineschi, M. E.Malvolti, F.Cannata, and H. H.Hattemer, eds. Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. SBP Academic, The Hague .
  • Adams, W. T., D. S. Birkes, and V. J. Erickson. 1992a. Using genetic markers to measure gene flow and pollen dispersal in forest tree seed orchards. Pp. 3761 in R.Wyatt, ed. Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction. Chapman and Hall, New York .
  • Adams, W. T., A. R. Griffin, and G. F. Moran. 1992b. Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populations. Am. Nat. 140:762780.
  • Austerlitz, F., and P. E. Smouse. 2001. Two generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. II. Alternative dispersal functions and sampling strategies. Genetics: In press.
  • Bossart, J. L., and D. P. Prowell. 1998. Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons, and new directions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:202206.
  • Brookshire, B. L., R. Jensen, and D. C. Dey. 1997. The Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: past, present and future. Pp. 125 in B. L.Brookshire and S. R.Shifley, eds. Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project symposium: an experimental approach to landscape research; 3–5 June 1997. St. Louis, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-193. USDA For. Serv., North Centr. For. Exp. Sta. St. Paul, MN.
  • Chakravarti, A., and C. C. Li. 1983. The effect of linkage on paternity calculations. Pp. 411422 in R. H.Walker, ed. Inclusion probabilities in parentage testing. American Association of Blood Banks, Arlington , VA .
  • Chakraborty, R., T. R. Meagher, and P. E. Smouse. 1988. Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. 1. Paternity exclusion and expected proportions of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics 118:527536.
  • Chase, M., C. Moller, R. Kesseli, and K. S. Bawa. 1996. Distant gene flow in tropical trees. Nature 383:398399.
  • Crawford, T. J. 1984. The estimation of neighborhood parameters for plant populations. Heredity 52:273283.
  • Devlin, B., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1990. The development and application of a refined method for estimating gene flow from angiosperm paternity analysis. Evolution 44:248259.
  • Dow, B. D., and M. V. Ashley. 1996. Micro satellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Molec. Ecol. 5:615627.
  • Ellstrand, N. C., and D. R. Elam. 1993. Population genetics of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:217242.
  • Ennos, R. A. 1994. Estimating the relative rates of pollen and seed migration among plant populations. Heredity 72:250259.
  • Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse, and J. M. Quattro. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction sites. Genetics 131:479491.
  • Falconer, D. R. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2d ed. Longman, London .
  • Gram, W. K. and V. L. Sork. 1999. Does population density reflect genetic diversity Conservation Biology 13:10791087.
  • Gram, W. K. and V. L. Sork. 1999. Association between environmental and genetic heterogeneity in forest tree populations. Ecology In press.
  • Hudson, R. 1991. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Pp. 144 in P.Harvey and L.Partridge, eds. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Univ. Press, New York .
  • Husband, B. C., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. A metapopulation perspective in plant population biology. J. Ecol. 84:461469.
  • Jamieson, A. 1994. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Anim. Genet. 25:3744.
  • Kaufman, S. R., P. E. Smouse, and E. R. Alvarez-Buylla. 1998. Pollen-mediated gene flow and differential male reproductive success in a tropical pioneer tree, Cecropia obtusifolia Bertol. (Moraceae): a paternity analysis. Heredity 81:164173.
  • Koop, A. L. 1996. Genetic variation and structure in Quercus alba L. in a Missouri Ozark landscape. Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Missouri, St. Louis .
  • Kudoh, H., and D. F. Whigham. 1997. Microgeographic genetic structure and gene flow in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae) populations. Am. J. Bot. 84:12851293.
  • Ledig, F. T. 1992. Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems. Oikos 63:87108.
  • Nason, J. D., and J. L. Hamrick. 1997. Reproductive and genetic consequences of forest fragmentation: two case studies of neotropical canopy trees. J. Heredity 88:264276.
  • Nason, J. D., E. A. Herre, and J. L. Hamrick. 1996. Paternity analysis of the breeding structure of strangler fig populations: evidence for substantial long-distance wasp dispersal. J. Biogeogr. 23:501512.
  • Neigel, J. E. 1997. A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating gene flow from genetic markers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:105128.
  • Peakall, R., P. E. Smouse, and D. R. Huff. 1995. Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RAPD variation in diploid populations of dioecious buffalograss (Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.). Molec. Ecol. 4:135147.
  • Ritland, K. 1990. A series of FORTRAN computer programs for estimating plant mating systems. J. Hered. 81:235237.
  • Selvin, S. 1980. Probability of nonpaternity determined by multiple allele codominant systems. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 32:276278.
  • Slatkin, M. 1989. Detecting small amounts of gene flow from phylogenies of alleles. Genetics 121:609612.
  • Smouse, P. E., and R. Chakraborty. 1986. The use of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in paternity analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 38:918939.
  • Smouse, P. E., and C. Chevillon. 1998. Analytical aspects of population-specific DNA-fingerprinting for individuals. Heredity 89:143150.
  • Smouse, P. E., R. S. Spielman, and M.-H. Park. 1982. Multiplelocus allocation of individuals to groups as a function of the genetic variation within and differences among human populations. Am. Natural. 119:445463.
  • Smouse, P. E., T. R. Meagher, and C. J. Kobak. 1999. Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.): why do some males have larger reproductive contributions J. Evol. Biol. 12:10691077.
  • Sorensen, F. C. 1972. The seed orchard tree as a pollen sampler: a model and example. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note, PNW-175 175:111.
  • Sork, V. L., A. L. Koop, M. A. de la Fuente, P. Foster, and J. Raveill. 1997. Patterns of genetic variation in woody plant species in the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project (MOFEP). Pp. 233249 in B. L.Brookshire and S. R.Shirley, eds. Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project symposium: an experimental approach to landscape research; 3–5 June 1997; St. Louis, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-193. USDA For. Serv., North Centr. For. Exp. Sta., St. Paul, MN.
  • Sork, V. L., D. Campbell, R. Dyer, J. Fernandez, J. Nason, R. Petit, P. Smouse, and E. Steinberg. 1998. Proceedings from a workshop on gene flow in fragmented, managed, and continuous populations. Research Paper no. 3. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara , CA . http://www.nceas.ucsb.edu/nceas-web/projects/2057/nceas-paper3/.
  • Sork, V. L., J. Nason, D. R. Campbell, and J. F. Fernandez. 1999. Landscape approaches to the study of gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 142:219224.
  • Streiff, R., T. Labbe, R. Bacilieri, H. Steinkellner, J. Glossl, and A. Kremer. 1998. Within population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites. Molec. Ecol. 7:317328.
  • Tonsor, S. J., S. Kalisz, J. Fisher, and T. P. Holtsford. 1993. A life-history based study of population genetic structure: seed bank to adults in Plantago lanceolata. Evolution 47:833843.
  • Weir, B. S., and C. C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:13581370.
  • Wright, S. 1946. Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31:3959.
  • Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 2. The theory of gene frequencies. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago .