SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Literature Cited

  • Báez, A. M., and Z. B. De Gasparini 1979. The South American herpetofauna: an evaluation of the fossil record. Pp. 2954 in W. E.Duellman, ed. The South American herpetofauna: its origin, evolution, and dispersal. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist. Monogr. 7.
  • Baldauf, R. J. 1959. Morphological criteria and their use in showing bufonid phylogeny. J. Morphol. 104:527560.
  • Bever, G. S. 2002. Variation in the anuran ilium and its implications for species-level identification of fragmentary fossil specimens. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 22(supplement to 3):36A.
  • Blair, W. F. 1963. Evolutionary relationships of North American toads of the genus Bufo: a progress report. Evolution 17:116.
  • Blair, W. F. 1972a. Summary. Pp. 329343 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Blair, W. F. 1972b. Characteristics of the testes. Pp. 324328 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Blair, W. F. 1972c. Evidence from hybridization. Pp. 196232 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Blair, W. F. 1972d. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Blair, W. F. 1972e. Bufo of North and Central America. Pp. 93101 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Bogart, J. P. 1972. Karyotypes. Pp. 171195 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Briggs, J. C. 1994. The genesis of Central America: biology versus geophysics. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 1994:169172.
  • Brown, J. H., and M. V. Lomolino. 1998. Biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland , MA .
  • Brown, R. M., and S. I. Guttman 2002. Phylogenetic systematics of the Rana signata complex of Philippine and Bornean stream frogs: reconsideration of Huxley's modification of Wallace's line at the Oriental-Australian faunal zone interface. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76:393461.
  • Buckley, T. R. 2002. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets. Syst. Biol. 51:509523.
  • Campbell, J. A. 1999. Distribution patterns of amphibians in Middle America. Pp. 111210 in W. E.Duellman, ed. Patterns of distribution of amphibians. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore , MD .
  • Cannone, J. J., S. Subramanian, M. N. Schnare, J. R. Collett, L. M. D'Souza, Y. Du, B. Feng, N. Lin, L. V. Madabusi, K. M. Muller, N. Pande, Z. Shang, N. Yu, and R. R. Gutell 2002. The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BioMed Cent. Bioinform. 3:15.
  • Cardellini, P., G. Casas Andreu, D. Goenarso, L. Guidolin, R. Martino, M. B. Rasotto, M. Sala, and M. Scalabrin 1984. Globin evolution in some species of the genus Bufo. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 78:2125.
  • Cei, J. M. 1972. Bufo of South America. Pp. 8292 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Cei, J. M., V. Erspamer, and M. Roseghini 1972. Biogenic amines. Pp. 233243 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Conant, R., and J. T. Collins 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Houghton-Mifflin Company, Boston .
  • Conroy, C. J., and J. A. Cook 2000. Molecular systematics of a Holarctic rodent (Microtus: Muridae). J. Mammal. 81:344359.
  • Cracraft, J. 1988. Deep-history biogeography: retrieving the historical pattern of evolving continental biotas. Syst. Zool. 37:221236.
  • Cracraft, J. 1994. Species diversity, biogeography, and the evolution of biotas. Am. Zool. 34:3347.
  • Darst, C. R., and D. C. Cannatella 2004. Novel relationships among hyloid frogs inferred from 12S and 16S mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:462475.
  • Davis, C. C., C. D. Bell, S. Mathews, and M. J. Donoghue 2002. Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: evidence from Malpighiaceae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:68336837.
  • Duellman, W. E., and R. Schulte 1992. Description of a new species of Bufo from northern Peru with comments on phenetic groups of South American toads (Anura: Bufonidae). Copeia 1992:162172.
  • Duque-Caro, H. 1990. Neogene stratigraphy, paleoceanography and paleobiogeography in northwest South America and the evolution of the Panama Seaway. Palaeogeog. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 77:203234.
  • Engel, S. R., K. M. Hogan, J. F. Taylor, and S. K. Davis 1998. Molecular systematics and paleobiogeography of the South American sigmodontine rodents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:3549.
  • Estes, R., and A. Báez 1985. Herpetofaunas of North and South America during the late Cretaceous and Cenozoic: evidence for interchange? Pp. 139197 in F. G.Stehli and S. D.Webb, eds. The great American biotic interchange. Plenum Press, New York .
  • Evans, B. J., R. M. Brown, J. A. McGuire, J. Supriatna, N. Andayani, A. Diesmos, D. Iskandar, D. J. Melnick, and D. C. Cannatella 2003. Phylogenetics of fanged frogs: testing biogeographical hypotheses at the interface of the Asian and Australian faunal zones. Syst. Biol. 52:794819.
  • Ford, L. S., and D. C. Cannatella 1993. The major clades of frogs. Herpetol. Monogr. 7:94117.
  • Frost, D. R. 2002. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. V2.21 (15 July 2002). Electronic database available via http:research.amnh.orgherpetologyamphibiaindex.html.
  • Gayet, M., J. C. Rage, T. Sempere, and P. Y. Gagner 1992. Mode of interchanges of continental vertebrates between North and South America during the late Cretaceous and Paleocene. Bull. Soc. G;ol. France 163:781791.
  • Gingerich, P. D. 1985. South American mammals in the Paleocene of North America. Pp. 123137 in F. G.Stehli and S. D.Webb, eds. The great American biotic interchange. Plenum Press, New York .
  • Goebel, A. M. 1996. Systematics and conservation of bufonids in North America and in the Bufo boreas species group. Ph.D. diss., University of Colorado, Boulder.
  • Goebel, A. M., J. M. Donnelly, and M. E. Atz 1999. PCR primers and amplification methods for 12S ribosomal DNA, the control region, cytochrome oxidase I, and cytochrome b in bufonids and other frogs, and an overview of PCR primers which have amplified DNA in amphibians successfully. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11:163199.
  • Goldman, N., J. P. Anderson, and A. G. Rodrigo 2000. Likelihoodbased tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652670.
  • Graybeal, A. 1993. The phylogenetic utility of cytochrome b: lessons from bufonid frogs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:256269.
  • Graybeal, A. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of bufonid frogs and tests of alternate macroevolutionary hypotheses characterizing their radiation. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 119:297338.
  • Graybeal, A. G., and D. C. Cannatella 1995. A new taxon of Bufonidae from Peru, with descriptions of two new species and a review of the phylogenetic status of supraspecific bufonid taxa. Herpetologica 51:105131.
  • Guttman, S. I. 1972. Blood proteins. Pp. 265278 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Halffter, G. 1987. Biogeography of the montane entomofauna of Mexico and Central America. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32:95114.
  • Haq, B. U., J. Hardendol, and P. R. Vail 1987. Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. Science 235:11561167.
  • Harris, D. J. 2001. Reevaluation of 16S ribosomal RNA variation in Bufo (Anura: Amphibia). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19:326329.
  • Hillis, D. M., B. K. Mable, and C. Moritz 1996. Applications of molecular systematics: the state of the field and a look to the future. Pp. 515543 in D. M.Hillis, C.Moritz, and B. K.Mable, eds. Molecular systematics. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland , MA .
  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., and B. Rannala 1997. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276:227232.
  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754755.
  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., D. M. Hillis, and R. Jones 1996a. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance. Pp. 1945 in J. D.Ferraris and S. R.Palumbi, eds. Molecular zoology: advances, strategies, and protocols. Wiley-Liss, New York .
  • Huelsenbeck, J. P., D. M. Hillis, and R. Nielsen 1996b. A likelihood-ratio test of monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45:546558.
  • Hulsey, C. D., F. J. Garcia de León, Y. S. Johnson, D. A. Hendrickson, and T. J. Near 2004. Temporal diversification of Mesoamerican cichlid fishes across a major biogeographic boundary. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:754764.
  • Inger, R. F. 1972. Bufo of Eurasia. Pp. 102118 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Kraus, F., D. G. Mink, and W. M. Brown 1996. Crotaline intergeneric relationships based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Copeia 1996:763773.
  • Low, B. S. 1972. Evidence from parotoid-gland secretions. Pp. 244264 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Macey, J. R., J. A. Schulte, A. Larson, N. B. Ananjeva, Y. Wang, R. Pethiyagoda, N. Rastegar-Pouyani, and T. J. Papenfuss 2000. Evaluating trans-Tethys migration: an example using acrodont lizard phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:233256.
  • Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison 2000. MacClade 4: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Ver. 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland , MA .
  • Marshall, L. G., C. De Muizon, and B. Sige 1983. Late Cretaceous mammals (Marsupialia) from Bolivia. Geobios 16:739745.
  • Martin, R. F. 1972. Evidence from osteology. Pp. 3770 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Martin, R. F. 1973. Osteology of North American Bufo: the americanus, cognatus, and boreas species groups. Herpetologica 29:375387.
  • Martin, W. F. 1972. Evolution of vocalization in the genus Bufo. Pp. 279309 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Masta, S. E., B. K. Sullivan, T. Lamb, and E. J. Routman 2002. Molecular systematics, hybridization, and phylogeography of the Bufo americanus complex in eastern North America. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24:302314.
  • Maxson, L. R. 1981a. Albumin evolution and its phylogenetic implications in African toads of the genus Bufo. Herpetologica 37:96104.
  • Maxson, L. R. 1981b. Albumin evolution and its phylogenetic implications in toads of the genus Bufo. II. Relationships among Eurasian Bufo. Copeia 1981:579583.
  • Maxson, L. R. 1984. Molecular probes of phylogeny and biogeography in toads of the widespread genus Bufo. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1:345356.
  • Maxson, L. R., A. Song, and R. Lopata 1981. Phylogenetic relationships among North American toads, genus Bufo. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 9:347350.
  • Miller, R. R. 1966. Geographical distribution of Central American freshwater fishes. Copeia 1966:773802.
  • Miller, R. R. 1986. Origin and geography of fishes of central Mexico. Pp. 487517 in C. H.Hocutt and E. O.Wiley, eds. The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. Wiley and Sons, New York .
  • Mulcahy, D. G., and J. R. Mendelson 2000. Phylogeography and speciation of the morphologically variable, widespread species Bufo valliceps, based on molecular evidence from mtDNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17:173189.
  • Ortega, J., and H. T. Arita 1998. Neotropical-Nearctic limits in Middle America as determined by distributions of bats. J. Mammal. 79:772783.
  • Palumbi, S. R. 1996. Nucleic acids. II. The polymerase chain reaction. Pp. 205247 in D. M.Hillis, C.Moritz, and B. K.Mable, eds. Molecular systematics. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland , MA .
  • Parkinson, C. L. 1999. Molecular systematics and biogeographical history of the pitvipers as determined by mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Copeia 1999:576586.
  • Patton, T. H. 1969. An Oligocene land vertebrate fauna from Florida. J. Paleontol. 43:543546.
  • P;rez-Higaredera, G., and L. D. Navarro 1980. The faunistic districts of the low plains of Veracruz, Mexico, based on reptilian and mammalian data. Bull. MD. Herpetol. Soc. 16:5469.
  • Pitman, W. C., III, S. Cande, J. LaBrecque, and J. Pindell 1993. Fragmentation of Gondwana: the separation of Africa from South America. Pp. 1534 in P.Goldblatt, ed. Biological relationships between Africa and South America. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven , CT .
  • Porter, K. R. 1963. Distribution and taxonomic status of seven species of Mexican Bufo. Herpetologica 19:229247.
  • Porter, K. R., and W. F. Porter 1967. Venom comparisons and relationships of twenty species of New World toads (genus Bufo). Copeia 1967:298307.
  • Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817818.
  • Pramuk, J. B. 2002. Combined evidence and cladistic relationships of West Indian toads (Anura: Bufonidae). Herpetol. Monogr. 16:121151.
  • Rosen, D. E. 1978. Vicariant patterns and historical explanation in biogeography. Syst. Zool. 27:159188.
  • Sanchiz, B. 1998. Salientia. 4. Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology. P.Wellhofer, ed. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich .
  • Sanders, O. 1961. Indications for the hybrid origin of Bufo terrestris Bonnaterre. Herpetologica 17:145156.
  • Sanders, O., and J. C. Cross 1964. Relationships between certain North American toads as shown by cytological study. Herpetologica 19:248255.
  • Savage, J. M. 1966. The origins and history of the Central American herpetofauna. Copeia 1966:719766.
  • Savage, J. M. 1973. The geographic distribution of frogs: patterns and predictions. Pp. 351445 in J. L.Vial, ed. Evolutionary biology of the anurans: contemporary research on major problems. Univ. of Missouri Press, Columbia .
  • Sclater, P. L. 1858. On the general geographical distribution of the members of the class Aves. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2:130145.
  • Shaffer, H. B., G. M. Fellers, A. Magee, and S. R. Voss 2000. The genetics of amphibian decline: population substructure and molecular differentiation in the Yosemite toad, Bufo canorus (Anura, Bufonidae) based on single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Mol. Ecol. 9:245257.
  • Simpson, B. B., J. A. Tate, and A. Weeks The biogeography of Hoffmannseggia (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Caesalpinieae): a tale of many travels. J. Biogeog. in press.
  • Simpson, G. G. 1977. Too many lines: the limits of the Oriental and Australian zoogeographic regions. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 121:107120.
  • Stebbins, R. C. 1985. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton-Mifflin Company, Boston .
  • Steppan, S. J., M. R. Akhverdyan, E. A. Lyapunova, D. G. Fraser, N. N. Vorontsov, R. S. Hoffmann, and M. J. Braun 1999. Molecular phylogeny of the marmots (Rodentia: Sciuridae): tests of evolutionary and biogeographic hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 48:715734.
  • Stone, K. D., and J. A. Cook 2002. Molecular evolution of Holarctic martens (genus Martes, Mammalia: Carnivora: Mustelidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24:169179.
  • Sullivan, J., E. Arellano, and D. S. Rogers 2000. Comparative phylogeography of Mesoamerican highland rodents: concerted versus independent response to past climatic fluctuations. Am. Nat. 155:755768.
  • Swofford, D. L. 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Sinauer, Sunderland , MA .
  • Szarski, H. 1972. Integument and soft parts. Pp. 7181 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Tihen, J. A. 1951. Anuran remains from the Miocene of Florida, with the description of a new species of Bufo. Copeia 1951:230235.
  • Tihen, J. A. 1962a. Osteological observations on New World Bufo. Am. Midl. Nat. 67:157183.
  • Tihen, J. A. 1962b. A review of New World fossil bufonids. Am. Midl. Nat. 68:150.
  • Tihen, J. A. 1972. The fossil record. Pp. 813 in W. F.Blair, ed. Evolution in the genus Bufo. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin .
  • Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. Higgins 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:48764882.
  • Vanzolini, P. E., and W. R. Heyer 1985. The American herpetofauna and the interchange. Pp. 475487 in F. G.Stehli and S. D.Webb, eds. The great American biotic interchange. Plenum Press, New York .
  • Vences, M., D. R. Vieites, F. Glaw, H. Brinkmann, J. Kosuch, M. Veith, and A. Meyer 2003. Multiple overseas dispersal in amphibians. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:24352442.
  • Wallace, A. R. 1876. The geographical distribution of animals. 2 vols. Macmillan, London .
  • Wiley, E. O. 1988. Vicariance biogeography. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:513542.