Author's note: An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. We thank participants, Pauline Mcguirk, and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program
Article first published online: 6 MAY 2004
International Studies Quarterly
Volume 48, Issue 2, pages 471–493, June 2004
How to Cite
Betsill, M. M. and Bulkeley, H. (2004), Transnational Networks and Global Environmental Governance: The Cities for Climate Protection Program. International Studies Quarterly, 48: 471–493. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00310.x
- Issue published online: 6 MAY 2004
- Article first published online: 6 MAY 2004
The past decade has witnessed a growing interest among scholars of international relations, and global environmental governance in particular, in the role of transnational networks within the international arena. While the existence and potential significance of such networks has been documented, many questions concerning the nature of governance conducted by such networks and their impact remain. We contribute to these debates by examining how such networks are created and maintained and the extent to which they can foster policy learning and change. We focus on the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) program, a network of some 550 local governments concerned with promoting local initiatives for the mitigation of climate change. It is frequently asserted that the importance of such networks lies in their ability to exchange knowledge and information, and to forge norms about the nature and terms of particular issues. However, we find that those local governments most effectively engaged with the network are mobilized more by the financial and political resources it offers, and the legitimacy conferred to particular norms about climate protection, than by access to information. Moreover, processes of policy learning within the CCP program take place in discursive struggles as different actors seek legitimacy for their interpretations of what local climate protection policies should mean. In conclusion, we reflect upon the implications of these findings for understanding the role of transnational networks in global environmental governance.