SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrams, P.A. & Ginzburg, L.R. (2000) The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 337341.
  • Anderson, T.W. (2001) Predator responses, prey refuges, and density-dependent mortality of a marine fish. Ecology, 82, 245257.
  • Bergström, U. & Englund, G. (2002) Estimating predation rates in experimental systems: scale-dependent effects of aggregative behaviour. Oikos, 97, 251259.
  • Buecher, E. & Gasser, B. (1998) Estimation of predatory impact of Pleurobrachia rhodopis (cydippid ctenophore) in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea: in situ observations and laboratory experiments. Journal of Plankton Research, 20, 631651.
  • Butorina, L.G. (1986) On the problem of aggregations of planktonic crustaceans Polyphemus pediculus (L.), Cladocera. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie, 105, 355386.
  • Christensen, B. (1996) Predator foraging capabilities and prey antipredator behaviours: pre- versus postcapture constraints on size-dependent predator–prey interactions. Oikos, 76, 368380.
  • Cooper, S.D. & Goldman, C.R. (1982) Environmental factors affecting predation rates of Mysis relicta. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39, 203208.
  • Crowley, P.H., Nisbet, R.M., Gurney, W.S.C. & Lawton, J.H. (1987) Population regulation in animals with complex life-histories: formulation and analysis of a damselfly model. Advances in Ecological Research, 17, 159.
  • Dodson, S.I., Ryan, S., Tollrian, R. & Lampert, W. (1997) Individual swimming behavior of Daphnia: effects of food, light and container size in four clones. Journal of Plankton Research, 19, 15371552.
  • Enckell, P.H. (1980) Kräftdjur. Signum, Lund.
  • Englund, G. (1997) Importance of spatial scale and prey movements in predator caging experiments. Ecology, 78, 23162325.
  • Englund, G. & Cooper, S.D. (2002) Scale effects and extrapolation in ecological experiments. Advances in Ecological Research, 33, 161213.
  • Englund, G. & Harms, S. (2001) The functional response of a predatory plant preying on swarming zooplankton. Oikos, 94, 175181.
  • Fockedey, N. & Mees, J. (1999) Feeding of the hyperbenthic mysid Neomysis integer in the maximum turbidity zone of the Elbe, Westerschelde and Gironde estuaries. Journal of Marine Systems, 22, 207228.
  • Gerritsen, J. & Strickler, J.R. (1977) Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. Journal of Fish Research Board of Canada, 34, 7382.
  • Gurney, W.S.C., McCauley, E., Nisbet, R.M. & Murdoch, W.W. (1990) The physiological ecology of Daphnia: a dynamic model of growth and reproduction. Ecology, 71, 716732.
  • Hassell, M.P. (1978) The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator–Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Holling, C.S. (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomologist, 91, 385398.
  • Jeschke, J.M., Kopp, M. & Tollrian, R. (2002) Predator functional responses: discriminating between handling and digesting prey. Ecological Monographs, 72, 95112.
  • Juliano, S.A. (1993) Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In: Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments (eds S.M.Scheiner & J.Gurevitch), pp. 159182. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Kaiser, H. (1983) Small-scale spatial heterogeneity influences predation success in an unexpected way: model experiments on the functional response of predatory mites (Acarina). Oecologia, 56, 249256.
  • Kemp, W.M., Petersen, J.E. & Gardner, R.H. (2001) Scale-dependence and the problem of extrapolation: implications for experimental and natural coastal ecosystems. In: Scaling Relations in Experimental Ecology (eds R.H.Gardner, W.M.Kemp & J.E.Petersen), pp. 347. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • De Lafontaine, Y. & Leggett, W.C. (1987) Effect of container size on estimates of mortality and predation rates in experiments with macrozooplankton and larval fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44, 15341543.
  • Mauchline, J. (1971) The biology of Neomysis integer (Crustacea, Mysidacea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 347354.
  • Mauchline, J. (1980) The biology of mysids and euphausiids. Advances in Marine Biology, 18, 1677.
  • O'Brien, W.J. (1988) The effect of container size on the feeding rate of Heterocope septentrionalis, a fresh-water predaceous copepod. Journal of Plankton Research, 10, 313317.
  • Petersen, J.E., Chen, C.C. & Kemp, W.M. (1997) Scaling aquatic primary productivity: experiments under nutrient- and light-limited conditions. Ecology, 78, 23262338.
  • Rogers, D. (1972) Random search and insect population models. Journal of Animal Ecology, 41, 369383.
  • De Roos, A.M. & Persson, L. (2001) Physiologically structured models − from versatile technique to ecological theory. Oikos, 94, 5171.
  • Royama, T. (1971) A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Researches in Population Ecology, 1, 191.
  • Sandström, O. (1980) The ecology of the plankton fauna in the Gulf of Bothnia. PhD thesis, Umeå University, Sweden.
  • Savino, J.F. & Stein, R.A. (1982) Predator–prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 111, 255266.
  • Stephenson, G.L., Hamilton, P., Kaushik, N.K., Robinson, J.B. & Solomon, K.R. (1984) Spatial distribution of plankton in enclosures of 3 sizes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 41, 10481054.
  • Tang, M. & Boisclair, D. (1993) Influence of the size of enclosures on the swimming characteristics of juvenile brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50, 17861793.
  • Viitasalo, M., Kiorboe, T., Flinkman, J., Pedersen, L.W. & Visser, A.W. (1998) Predation vulnerability of planktonic copepods: consequences of predator foraging strategies and prey sensory abilities. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 175, 129142.
  • Viitasalo, M. & Rautio, M. (1998) Zooplanktivory by Praunus flexuosus (Crustacea: Mysidacea): functional responses and prey selection in relation to prey escape responses. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 174, 7787.
  • Voit, E.O. (1984) Encounters in predator–prey systems: a simple discrete model. Biosystems, 17, 5764.
  • Wiens, J.A. (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology, 3, 385397.
  • Wilhelm, F.M., Schindler, D.W. & McNaught, A.S. (2000) The influence of experimental scale on estimating the predation rate of Gammarus lacustris (Crustacea: Amphipoda) on Daphnia in an alpine lake. Journal of Plankton Research, 22, 17191734.