1365-2664/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=8b608cc23970983efcf0bf9354181123ee4feba9)
1365-2664/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=01405a21098d64198820bdbe2e30807b513e69f2)
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Changes in species richness with stocking density of marine bivalves
Article first published online: 18 MAY 2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00906.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
BEADMAN, H. A., KAISER, M. J., GALANIDI, M., SHUCKSMITH, R. and WILLOWS, R. I. (2004), Changes in species richness with stocking density of marine bivalves. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41: 464–475. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00906.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 MAY 2004
- Article first published online: 18 MAY 2004
- Received 23 May 2003; final copy received 29 January 2004
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- community change;
- ecological impact;
- large-scale experiment;
- mussel cultivation;
- Mytilus edulis
Summary
- 1Monocultures of mussels might alter the infaunal benthic community of adjacent and interstitial sediments through provision of a complex habitat, input of organically rich material and larval removal through filter feeding. At a site of commercial seabed mussel cultivation, we aimed to determine the effect of mussels on the infaunal community of an intertidal mudflat at different spatial scales and under different stocking strategies.
- 2Mussels were laid at four different densities (2, 3, 5 and 7·5 kg m−2) on 400-m2 plots in a 4 × 4 Latin square. Benthic samples were collected within and 10–100 m distant from the cultivation area c. 7 months prior to and 18 months after seeding the plots with blue mussels. Benthic community characteristics were related to initial seeding density and to the actual surface area of mussels associated with each set of samples collected within replicate plots.
- 3The presence of mussels significantly changed the occurrence of some species of the infaunal community within the cultivated area. The infaunal communities supported fewer individuals and species than control treatments at all but the lowest mussel cover.
- 4Species richness and the abundance of individuals per unit area also declined with increased area of mussel cover. The abundance of cirratulids and amphipods declined strongly with increasing mussel surface area.
- 5Although the species composition and abundance of individual invertebrate species were altered by the presence of mussels, the distribution of individuals among species remained relatively unchanged.
- 6Synthesis and applications. Overall, mussel beds changed the infaunal community, but the effects were localized (0–10 m) and not detectable at larger scales (10–100 m). Changes in benthic community composition could be reduced (but not eliminated) by lowering the stocking density of mussels to either 2 or 3 kg m−2. Given the small edge effects associated with cultivated mussel beds, the use of larger mussel beds would be preferable to many smaller mussel beds.