You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Modelling integrated weed management of an invasive shrub in tropical Australia
Article first published online: 18 MAY 2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00909.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
BUCKLEY, Y. M., REES, M., PAYNTER, Q. and LONSDALE, M. (2004), Modelling integrated weed management of an invasive shrub in tropical Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41: 547–560. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00909.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 MAY 2004
- Article first published online: 18 MAY 2004
- Received 28 July 2003; final copy received 25 February 2004
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- biological control of weeds;
- feral mammals;
- fire;
- herbicide;
- spatial modelling
Summary
- 1Where biocontrol programmes for invasive plants are in place, only one-third are fully successful. Integrated weed management (IWM) emphasizes the use of several complementary control measures.
- 2We used models of increasing complexity to determine which parameters affect site occupancy of an invasive shrub, Mimosa pigra, in tropical Australia. Two introduced biocontrol agents have spatial effects on both plant fecundity and the probability of recolonization after senescence. We incorporated biocontrol effects into IWM models with small-scale disturbance, such as grazing and pig-rooting, and large-scale disturbance, such as mechanical control, herbicide and fire. The models were parameterized from experimental and field data.
- 3The models indicated that reduction in fecundity is not the most important impact of biocontrol; rather it is defoliation at the edges of stands, allowing grasses to out-compete M. pigra seedlings. We demonstrated that biocontrol alone is only successful at low levels of small-scale disturbance and seedling survival and, even then, current biocontrol agents would take decades to reduce a stand to < 5% site occupancy.
- 4Our model predicts the most successful IWM strategy to be an application of herbicide in year 1, mechanical control + fire in year 2 and herbicide in year 3, with reduction of small-scale disturbance where possible. The addition of biocontrol improves the success of this strategy.
- 5Synthesis and applications. Ascertaining how control measures, including biological methods, will influence persistence of an invasive requires models of the target species’ dynamics and its ecosystem. As in previous applications of this model, disturbance is the most important regulator of population size in M. pigra; moderate to high levels of small-scale disturbance promotes M. pigra occupancy. We have shown that IWM can control M. pigra and that biocontrol is an effective part of this strategy. Reductions in fecundity alone are unlikely to control invasive leguminous shrubs. However, biocontrol agents affect the probability of recolonization after senescence and enhance control. Our recommended 3-year treatment programme (herbicide : mechanical control + fire : herbicide, with biocontrol) is justifiable in terms of the biology of the system, making it more likely to be acted upon by risk-averse farmers and land managers.

1365-2664/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=8b608cc23970983efcf0bf9354181123ee4feba9)
1365-2664/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=01405a21098d64198820bdbe2e30807b513e69f2)
