SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Allan, J.D. (1975) The distributional ecology and diversity of benthic insects in Cement Creek, Colorado. Ecology, 56, 10401053.
  • Allan, J.D. (1995) Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  • Barmuta, L.A. (1989) Habitat patchiness and macrobenthic community structure in an upland stream in temperate Victoria, Australia. Freshwater Biology, 21, 223236.
  • Berendonk, T.U. & Bonsall, M.B. (2002) The phantom midge and a comparison of metapopulation structures. Ecology, 83, 116128.
  • Boon, P.J. (1988) The impact of river regulation on invertebrates in the UK. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 2, 389409.
  • Bournaud, M., Tachet, H., Berly, A. & Cellot, B. (1998) Importance of microhabitat characteristics in the macrobenthos microdistribution of a large rive reach. Annals of Limnology, 34, 8398.
  • Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1987) canoco– A FORTRAN Program for Canonical Community Ordination by [Partial][Detrended][Canonical] Correspondance Analysis, Principal Components Analysis and Redundancy Analysis.ITI-INO, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  • Brookes, A. (1988) Channelized Rivers. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Brookes, A. (1992) Recovery and restoration of some engineered British river channels. River Conservation and Management(eds P.J.Boon, P.Calow & G.E.Petts), pp. 337353. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Brookes, A. (1995) River channel restoration: theory and practice. Changing River Channels(eds A.M.Gurnell & G.E.Petts), pp. 369388. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Brookes, A. (1996) River restoration experience in Northern Europe. River Channel Restoration: Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects(eds A.Brookes & F.D.Shields), pp. 233267. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Brookes, A., Knight, S.S. & Shields, F.D. (1996) Habitat enhancement. River Channel Restoration – Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects(eds A.Brookes & F.D.Shields), pp. 76101. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Brookes, A. & Sear, D.A. (1996) Geomorphological principles for restoring channels. River Channel Restoration – Guiding Principles for Sustainable Projects(eds A.Brookes & F.D.Shields), pp. 76101. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Cellot, B., Bournaud, M. & Tachet, H. (1984) The movements of the larvae of Hydropsyche (Trichoptera) in a large river. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Trichoptera(ed. J.Morse), pp. 5768. Dr W. Junk, The Hague, Netherlands.
  • Culp, J.M., Walde, S.J. & Davies, R.W. (1983) Relative importance of substrate particle size and detritus to stream benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 40, 15681574.
  • Cummins, K.W. & Lauff, G.H. (1969) The influence of substrate particle size on the microdistribution of stream macrobenthos. Hydrobiologia, 34, 145181.
  • De Jalón, D.G. (1995) Management of physical habitat for fish stocks. The Ecological Basis for River Management(eds D.M.Harper & A.J.D.Ferguson), pp. 363374. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Driver, A. (1997) River and wetland rehabilitation in the Thames catchment. British Wildlife, 8, 362372.
  • Erman, D.C. & Erman, N.A. (1984) The response of stream macroinvertebrates to substrate size and heterogeneity. Hydrobiologia, 108, 7582.
  • Friberg, N., Kronvang, B., Hansen, H.O. & Svendsen, L.M. (1998) Long term, habitat-specific response of a macroinvertebrate community to river restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8, 8799.
  • Friberg, N., Kronvang, B., Svendsen, L.M., Hansen, H.O. & Nielsen, M.B. (1994) Restoration of a channelized reach of the River Gelså, Denmark: effects on the macroinvertebrate community. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 4, 289296.
  • Gardiner, J.L. & Cole, L. (1992) Catchment planning: the way forward for river protection in the UK. River Conservation and Management(eds P.J.Boon, P.Calow & G.E.Petts), pp. 397406. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Gee, J.H.R. (1982) Resource utilization by Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda) in a Cotswold stream: a microdistribution study. Journal of Animal Ecology, 51, 817832.
  • Gordon, N.D., McMahon, T.A. & Finlayson, B.L. (1992) Stream Hydrology: An Introduction for Ecologists. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  • Gore, J.A., Crawford, D.J. & Addison, D.S. (1998) An analysis of artificial riffles and enhancement of benthic community diversity by physical habitat simulation (PHABSIM) and direct observation. Regulated Rivers-Research and Management, 14, 6977.
  • Harper, D., Ebrahimnezhad, M. & Cot, F.C.I. (1998) Artificial riffles in river rehabilitation: setting the goals and measuring the successes. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8, 516.
  • Harper, D.M., Ebrahimnezhad, M., Taylor, E., Dickinson, S., Decamp, O., Verniers, G. & Balbi, T. (1999) A catchment-scale approach to the physical restoration of lowland rivers UK. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 9, 141157.
  • Harper, D. & Everard, M. (1998) Why should the habitat-level approach underpin holistic river survey and management? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8, 395413.
  • Harper, D.M., Smith, C.D. & Barham, P. (1992) Habitats as the building blocks for river conservation assessment. River Conservation and Management(eds P.J.Boon, P.Calow & G.E.Petts), pp. 311319.Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Harper, D.M., Smith, C.D., Barham, P. & Howell, R. (1995) The ecological basis for the management of the natural river environment. The Ecological Basis for River Management(eds D.M.Harper & A.J.D.Ferguson), pp. 219238. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
  • Harrison, S.S.C. (2000) The importance of aquatic margins to invertebrates in English chalk streams. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 149, 213240.
  • Harrison, S.S.C. & Harris, I.T. (2002) The impact of bankside management on chalk stream invertebrates. Freshwater Biology, 47, 22332245.
  • Harrison, S., Harris, I., Croeze, A. & Wiggers, R. (2000) The influence of bankside trees on the distribution of larvae and adults of the Glossosomatid caddis Agapetus fuscipes. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, 27, 14801484.
  • Heino, J., Muotka, T. & Paavola, R. (2003) Determinants of macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: regional and local influences. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 425434.
  • Hey, R.D. (1990) River mechanics and habitat creation. Fisheries in the Year 2000 (eds K.T.O'Grady, A.J.B.Butterworth, P.B.Spillett & C.J.Domaniewski), pp. 271285. Institute of Fisheries Management, Nottingham, UK.
  • Hey, R.D. (1996) Environmentally sensitive river engineering. River Restoration(eds G.E.Petts & P.Calow), pp. 80105. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
  • Hildrew, A.G. & Giller, P.S. (1994) Patchiness, species interactions and disturbance in the stream benthos. Aquatic Ecology – Scale, Pattern and Process(eds P.S.Giller, A.G.Hildrew & D.G.Raffaelli), pp. 2163. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
  • Hildrew, A.G., Townsend, C.R. & Henderson, J. (1980) Interactions between larval size, microdistribution and substrate in the stoneflies of an iron-rich stream. Oikos, 35, 387396.
  • Hynes, H.B.N. (1970) The Ecology of Running Waters. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, UK.
  • Hynes, H.B.N. (1975) The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewande Limnologie, 19, 115.
  • Iversen, T.M., Kronvang, B., Madsen, B.L., Markmann, P. & Nielsen, M.B. (1993) Re-establishment of Danish streams: restoration and maintenance measures. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 3, 7392.
  • Jacobsen, D. & Sand-Jensen, K. (1992) Herbivory of invertebrates on submerged macrophytes from Danish freshwaters. Freshwater Biology, 28, 301308.
  • Jenkins, R.A., Wade, K.R. & Pugh, E. (1984) Macroinvertebrate-habitat relationships in the River Teifi catchment and the significance to conservation. Freshwater Biology, 14, 2342.
  • Lawton, J.M. (2000) Community ecology in a changing world. Excellence in Ecology, Vol. 11 (ed. O.Kinne). International Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.
  • Logan, P. & Brooker, M.P. (1983) The macroinvertebrate faunas of riffles and pools. Water Research, 17, 263270.
  • McCarthy, D.T. (1985) The adverse effects of channelization and their amelioration. Habitat Modification and Freshwater Fisheries – Proceedings of a Symposium of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission(ed. J.S.Alabaster), pp. 8398. Butterworths, London, UK.
  • Minshall, G.W. & Minshall, J.N. (1977) Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a Rocky Mountain (USA) stream. Hydrobiologia, 55, 231249.
  • Moss, B. (1998) Ecology of Fresh Waters, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
  • Muhar, S., Schmutz, S. & Jungwirth, M. (1995) River restoration concepts – goals and perspectives. Hydrobiologia, 303, 183194.
  • Muotka, T. & Laasonen, P. (2002) Ecosystem recovery in restored headwater streams: the role of enhanced leaf retention. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 145156.
  • Newson, M.D., Harper, D.M., Padmore, C.L., Kemp, J.L. & Vogel, B. (1998) A cost-effective approach for linking habitats, flow types and species requirements. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8, 431446.
  • Palmer, C.G. & O'Keefe, J.H. (1991) Are macroinvertebrate assemblages in the Buffalo River, southern Africa, associated with particular biotopes? Journal of the North Ameircan Benthological Society, 10, 349357.
  • Poole, G.C., Frissell, C.A. & Ralph, S.C. (1997) Instream habitat unit classification: inadequacies for monitoring and some consequences for management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33, 879896.
  • Pretty, J.L., Harrison, S.S.C., Shepherd, D.J., Smith, C., Hildrew, A.G. & Hey, R.D. (2003) River rehabilitation and fish populations: assessing the benefit of instream structures. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 251265.
  • Purseglove, J. (1988) Taming the Flood. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Rabeni, C.F. & Minshall, G.W. (1977) Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos, 29, 3343.
  • Rackham, O. (2000) The History of the Countryside. Phoenix Press, London, UK.
  • Rice, S.P., Greenwood, M.T. & Joyce, C.B. (2001) Macroinvertebrate community changes at coarse sediment recruitment points along two gravel bed rivers. Water Resources Research, 37, 27932803.
  • Riis, T. & Sand-Jensen, K. (2001) Historical changes in species composition and richness accompanying perturbation and eutrophication of Danish lowland streams over 100 years. Freshwater Biology, 46, 269280.
  • Sear, D.A. (1994) River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 4, 169177.
  • Spillett, P.B., Armstrong, G.S. & Magrath, P.A.G. (1985) Ameliorative methods to reinstate fisheries following land drainage operations. Habitat Modification and Freshwater Fisheries – Proceedings of a Symposium of the European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission(ed. J.S.Alabaster), pp. 124130. Butterworths, London, UK.
  • Sponseller, R.A., Benfield, E.F. & Valett, H.M. (2001) Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology, 46, 14091424.
  • Swales, S. (1982) Notes on the construction, installation and environmental effects of habitat improvement structures in a small lowland river in Shropshire. Fisheries Management, 13, 110.
  • Swales, S. (1983) A short-term study of the effects of a habitat improvement programme on the distribution and abundance of fish stocks in a small lowland river in Shropshire. Fisheries Management, 14, 135144.
  • Swales, S. (1989) The use of instream habitat improvement methodology in mitigating the adverse effects of river regulation in fisheries. Alternatives in Regulated River Management(eds J.A.Gore & G.E.Petts), pp. 185208. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  • Swales, S. & O'Hara, K. (1980) Instream habitat improvement devices and their use in freshwater fisheries management. Journal of Environmental Management, 10, 167179.
  • Sweeney, B.W. (1993) Effects of streamside vegetation on macroinvertebrate communities of White Clay Creek in eastern North America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 144, 291340.
  • Sweeting, R.A. (1996) River Pollution. River Restoration(eds G.E.Petts & P.Calow), pp. 716. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
  • Tarzwell, C.M. (1932) Trout stream improvement in Michigan. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 66, 177187.
  • Wesche, T.A. (1985) Stream channel modifications and reclamation structures to enhance fish habitat. Restoration of Rivers and Streams(ed. J.A.Gore), pp. 103164. Butterworth Publishers, Boston, UK.
  • White, R.J. (2002) Restoring streams for salmonids. Where have we been? Where are we going? Proceeding of the 13th International Salmonid Habitat Enhancement Workshop. Irish Freshwater Fisheries Ecology and Management Series. Central Fisheries Board, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Wiens, J.A. (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology, 47, 501515.
  • Wilcock, H.R., Hildrew, A.G. & Nichols, R.A. (2001) Genetic differentiation of a European caddisfly: past and present gene flow among fragmented larval habitats. Molecular Ecology, 10, 18211834.
  • Williams, D.D. & Moore, K.A. (1986) Microhabitat selection by a stream-dwelling amphipod: a multivariate analysis approach. Freshwater Biology, 16, 115122.
  • Williams, D.D. & Mundie, J.H. (1978) Substrate size selection by stream invertebrates and the influence of sand. Limnology and Oceanography, 23, 10301033.
  • Wright, J.F. & Symes, K.L. (1999) A nine-year study of the macroinvertebrate fauna of a chalk stream. Hydrological Processes, 13, 371385.