2Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lucy Johnston, Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Evaluating the Evaluators: Perceptions of Interviewers by Rejected Job Applicants as a Function of Interviewer and Applicant Sex1
Version of Record online: 11 OCT 2006
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume 36, Issue 11, pages 2635–2648, November 2006
How to Cite
Holloway, R. and Johnston, L. (2006), Evaluating the Evaluators: Perceptions of Interviewers by Rejected Job Applicants as a Function of Interviewer and Applicant Sex. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36: 2635–2648. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00120.x
1This research was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Master of Science in Applied Psychology by the first author. The authors thank Rich Farmer for his helpful comments.
- Issue online: 11 OCT 2006
- Version of Record online: 11 OCT 2006
Students who had recently had an unsuccessful job interview rated the competence of their interviewer and completed the Women As Managers Scale (WAMS; Terborg, Peters, Ilgen, & Smith, 1977). The results showed an impact of the sex of interviewer on judgments of interviewer competence and WAMS scores, but only for male participants. Male participants gave lower ratings of interviewer competence to female than to male interviewers, and ratings for the female interviewers were also lower than those given by female participants. Scores on the WAMS were lower for male participants who were interviewed by a female interviewer than those interviewed by a male interviewer, and were lower for male than for female participants with a female interviewer.