SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P. & Thompson, W.L. (2000) Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 912923.
  • Bella, I.E. (1971) A new competition model for individual trees. Forest Science, 17, 364372.
  • Biging, G.S. & Dobbertin, M. (1992) A comparison of distance-dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees. Forest Science, 38, 695720.
  • Binkley, D. (1983) Ecosystem production in Douglas–fir plantations: interaction of red alder and site fertility. Forest Ecology and Management, 5, 215227.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (1998) Model Selection and Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2001) Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies. Wildlife Research, 28, 111119.
  • Burton, P.J. (1993) Some limitations to static indices of plant competition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 21412152.
  • Cannell, M.G.R., Rothery, P. & Ford, E.D. (1984) Competition within stands of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta. Annals of Botany, 53, 349362.
  • Connolly, J. & Wayne, P. (1996) Asymmetric competition between plant species. Oecologia, 108, 311320.
  • Curtis, R.O., Herman, F.R. & DeMars, D. (1974) Height growth and site index for Douglas-fir in high-elevation forests of the Oregon-Washington Cascades. Forest Science, 20, 307316.
  • Daniels, R.F., Burkhart, H.E. & Clason, T.R. (1986) A comparison of measures for predicting growth of loblolly pine trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 12301237.
  • Dhôte, J.F. (1994) Hypotheses about competition for light and water in even-aged common beech (Fagus silvatica L.). Forest Ecology and Management, 69, 219232.
  • Duncan, R.P. (1991) Competition and coexistence of species in a mixed podocarp stand. Journal of Ecology, 79, 10731084.
  • Ford, E.D. (1975) Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures. Journal of Ecology, 63, 311333.
  • Ford, E.D. & Diggle, P.J. (1981) Competition for light in a plant monoculture modelled as a spatial stochastic process. Annals of Botany, 48, 481500.
  • Ford, E.D. & Sorrensen, K.A. (1992) Theory and models of inter-plant competition as a spatial process. Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology (eds D.L.De Angelis & L.J.Gross), pp. 363406. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Fuentes-Rodríquez, L.A. (1994) Factors influencing growth of young Douglas-fir and red alder in the Oregon Coast Range: interference, nitrogen availability, and animal damage. MSc Thesis, Oregon State University.
  • Glover, G.R. & Hool, J.N. (1979) A basal area ratio predictor of loblolly pine plantation mortality. Forest Science, 25, 275282.
  • Goldberg, D.E. (1987) Neighbourhood competition in an old-field plant community. Ecology, 68, 12111223.
  • Goldberg, D.E. (1990) Components of resource competition in plant communities. Perspectives in Plant Competition (eds J.B.Grace & D.Tilman), pp. 2749. Academic Press, New York.
  • Halpern, C.B. (1989) Early successional pathways of forest species: interactions of life history traits and disturbance. Ecology, 70, 704720.
  • Harper, J.L. (1977) The Population Biology of Plants. Harper & Row, New York.
  • Hartgerink, A.P. & Bazzaz, F.A. (1984) Seedling-scale environmental heterogeneity influences individual fitness and population structure. Ecology, 65, 198206.
  • Hegyi, F. (1974) A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands. Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation (ed. J.Fries), pp. 7490. Royal College Forest Research Notes 30, Stockholm.
  • Hitchcock, C.L. & Cronquist, A. (1976) Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
  • Holmes, M.J. & Reed, D.D. (1991) Competition indices for mixed species northern hardwoods. Forest Science, 37, 13381349.
  • Jolliffe, P.A. (2000) The replacement series. Journal of Ecology, 88, 371385.
  • Kubota, Y. & Hara, T. (1995) Tree competition and species coexistence in a sub-boreal forest, northern Japan. Annals of Botany, 76, 503512.
  • Lorimer, C.G. (1983) Tests of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 6, 343360.
  • Mack, R.N. & Harper, J.L. (1977) Interference in dune annuals: spatial pattern and neighbourhood effects. Journal of Ecology, 65, 345363.
  • Manning, S.J. & Barbour, M.G. (1988) Root systems, spatial patterns, and competition for soil moisture between two desert shrubs. American Journal of Botany, 75, 885893.
  • McLellan, A.J., Law, R. & Fitter, A.H. (1997) Response of calcareous grassland plant species to diffuse competition: results from a removal experiment. Journal of Ecology, 85, 479490.
  • Miller, T.E. & Werner, P.A. (1987) Competitive effects and responses between plant species in a first-year old-field community. Ecology, 68, 12011210.
  • Newton, M. & Cole (1994) Stand development and successional implications: pure and mixed stands. The Biology and Management of Red Alder (eds D.E.Hibbs, D.S.De Bell & R.F.Tarrant), pp. 243247. Oregon. State University Press, Corvallis, OR.
  • Oliver, C.D. & Larson, B.C. (1996) Forest Stand Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Patching, W.R. (1987) Soil survey of Lane County area, Oregon. United. States Department of Agriculture, Soil. Conservation Service.
  • Penridge, L.K. & Walker, J. (1986) Effect of neighbouring trees on eucalypt growth in a semi-arid woodland in Australia. Journal of Ecology, 74, 925936.
  • Peterson, C.J. & Squiers, E.R. (1995) Competition and succession in an aspen-white-pine forest. Journal of Ecology, 83, 449457.
  • Pringle, R.F. (1986) Soil survey of Grays Harbor County area, Pacific County, and Wahkiakum County, Washington. Soil Conservation Service. Washington Department of Natural Resources. Washington State University, Agricultural. Research Center.
  • Puettmann, K.J., Hibbs, D.E. & Hann, D.W. (1992) The dynamics of mixed stands of Alnus rubra and Pseudotsuga menziesii: extension of size-density analysis to mixture. Journal of Ecology, 80, 449458.
  • Purves, D.W. & Law, R. (2002) Experimental derivation of functions relating growth of Arabidopsis thaliana to neighbour size and distance. Journal of Ecology, 90, 882894.
  • Richardson, B., Kimberley, M.O., Ray, J.W. & Coker, G.W. (1999) Indices of interspecific competition for Pinus radiata in the central north island of New Zealand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 898905.
  • SAS Institute Inc. (1999) SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 8. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, N.C.
  • Schmitt, J., Ehrhardt, D. & Cheo, M. (1987) Dominance and suppression, size-dependent growth and self-thinning in a natural Impatiens capensis population. Journal of Ecology, 75, 651665.
  • Schwinning, S. & Weiner, J. (1998) Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia, 113, 447455.
  • Shainsky, L.J. & Radosevich, S.R. (1992) Mechanisms of competition between Douglas-fir and red alder seedlings. Ecology, 73, 3045.
  • Shipman, J.A. (1997) Soil survey of Lincoln County area, Oregon. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service and Forest Service.
  • Silander, J.A. & Pacala, S.W. (1985) Neighborhood predictors of plant performance. Oecologia, 66, 256263.
  • Som, R.K. (1996) Practical Sampling Techniques. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York.
  • Stoll, P., Weiner, J. & Schmid, B. (1994) Growth variation in a naturally established population of Pinus sylvestris. Ecology, 75, 660670.
  • Thomas, S.C. & Weiner, J. (1989) Including competitive asymmetry in measures of local interference in plant populations. Oecologia, 80, 349355.
  • Tilman, D. (1988) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structures of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Tomé, M. & Burkhart, H.E. (1989) Distance-dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees. Forest Science, 35, 816831.
  • Turner, M.D. & Rabinowitz, D. (1983) Factors affecting frequency distributions of plant mass: the absence of dominance and suppression in Festuca paradoxa. Ecology, 64, 469475.
  • Wagner, R.G. & Radosevich, S.R. (1998) Neighborhood approach for quantifying interspecific competition in coastal Oregon forests. Ecological Applications, 8, 779794.
  • Walker, L.R. & Chapin, F.S. III (1987) Physiological controls over seedling growth in primary succession on an Alaskan floodplain. Ecology, 67, 15081523.
  • Weigelt, A. & Jolliffe, P. (2003) Indices of plant competition. Journal of Ecology, 91, 707720.
  • Weiner, J. (1982) A neighbourhood model of annual-plant interference. Ecology, 63, 12371241.
  • Weiner, J. (1984) Neighbourhood interference amongst Pinus rigida individuals. Journal of Ecology, 72, 183195.
  • Weldon, C.W. & Slauson, W.L. (1986) The intensity of competition versus its importance: an overlooked distinction and some implications. Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 2344.
  • Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) (2001) Washington climate summaries: period of record monthly climate, Aberdeen station. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?waaber.
  • Williamson, G.B. (1990) Allelopathy, Koch's postulates, and the neck riddle. Perspectives in Plant Competition (eds J.B.Grace & D.Tilman), pp. 143158. Academic Press, New York.
  • De Wit, C.T. (1960) On competition. Verslagen Landbouwkundige Onderzoekigen, 66, 182.
  • Wykoff, W.R., Crookston, N.L. & Stage, A.R. (1982) User's guide to the stand prognosis model. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Technical Report. INT-133.
  • Yoda, K. Kira, T. Kira, H. & Hozumi, H. (1963) Intraspecific competition among higher plants XI. Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. Journal of Biology, Osaka City University, Series D, 14, 107129.
  • Zutter, B.R., Glover, G.R., Mitchell, R.J. & Gjerstad, D.H. (1997) Response of loblolly pine and sweetgum to intra- and inter-specific competition and influence of soil organic matter. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 20792087.