The anarchist's guide to ecological theory. Or, we don't need no stinkin’ laws
Article first published online: 13 MAY 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13959.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
O'Hara, R. B. (2005), The anarchist's guide to ecological theory. Or, we don't need no stinkin’ laws. Oikos, 110: 390–393. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13959.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 13 MAY 2005
- Article first published online: 13 MAY 2005
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Several ecologists have recently suggested that ecology has several laws. This conclusion contrasts with the views of some philosophers of science, who have suggested that biology cannot have laws. I argue that the debate has been confused because two very different types of law can be recognised: correlative and causal laws. Once we recognise that there is a difference, the argument against causal laws becomes stronger, and instead I suggest that ecologists should recognise that they can and do produce generalisations that are used to build models – nomological machines – that describe the ecological systems they are studying.

1600-0706/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=c8bcdc312039162ac838a8addedd8972de00c3d8)
1600-0706/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=5962a4894bf89f9c602a1c43dd189d54bc211185)