How to write consistently boring scientific literature
Article first published online: 26 NOV 2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15674.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Sand-Jensen, K. (2007), How to write consistently boring scientific literature. Oikos, 116: 723–727. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15674.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 26 NOV 2007
- Article first published online: 26 NOV 2007
- Manuscript Accepted 25 January 2007
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Although scientists typically insist that their research is very exciting and adventurous when they talk to laymen and prospective students, the allure of this enthusiasm is too often lost in the predictable, stilted structure and language of their scientific publications. I present here, a top-10 list of recommendations for how to write consistently boring scientific publications. I then discuss why we should and how we could make these contributions more accessible and exciting.

1600-0706/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=c8bcdc312039162ac838a8addedd8972de00c3d8)
