City-Suburb Differences in African American Male Labor Market Achievement
Article first published online: 23 FEB 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1996.00458.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cooke, T. J. (1996), City-Suburb Differences in African American Male Labor Market Achievement. The Professional Geographer, 48: 458–467. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1996.00458.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 FEB 2005
- Article first published online: 23 FEB 2005
- Initial submission, August 1995; revised submissions, January 1996, February 1996; final acceptance, March 1996.
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- spatial mismatch hypothesis;
- African American male employment;
- treatment effects model
This research tests the spatial mismatch hypothesis by comparing the employment probabilities of central city versus suburban African American males in nine metropolitan areas. Treatment effects models are used to control for the effects of both individual characteristics and residential self-selection on the probability of employment. A positive effect of suburban residential location on employment is found for the residents of Dallas, Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, while no effect is found for the residents of Cleveland, Houston. Jackson, Memphis, and Newark. The general conclusion to be drawn is that the spatial mismatch effect is contingent on the particular characteristics of each metropolitan area. Preliminary analysis shows that metropolitan areas with a spatial mismatch effect are large in terms of total population and total land area, and have less efficient transportation systems.

1467-9272/asset/prog_left.gif?v=1&s=4b9129c68a1ea1e28e2e5132ce595152861f2eb4)
1467-9272/asset/prog_right.gif?v=1&s=d2acd14cd488990cfb74b76eab57fd2d6026322f)
