*Support for this research has been provided by grants from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Center Core Grant P30 HD32030. We are grateful to Elana Broch, James Snow, Kristen Turner, and Chengzhi Wang for bibliographic assistance. Kalena Cortes, Sara Curran, Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar, Lauren Hale, Stephen LeMenager, Germán Rodríguez, Christopher Weiss, Charles Westoff, and, especially, Joyce Jacobsen and Mark Long contributed many useful suggestions.
1540-6237/asset/ssqu_left.gif?v=1&s=704f42f87d78306e34b2e6c4a436cccd393e2875)
1540-6237/asset/ssqu_right.gif?v=1&s=c83ddf94eedc044152055a5bd3c24be57c5d194d)
The Opportunity Cost of Admission Preferences at Elite Universities†
Article first published online: 26 APR 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00303.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Espenshade, T. J. and Chung, C. Y. (2005), The Opportunity Cost of Admission Preferences at Elite Universities. Social Science Quarterly, 86: 293–305. doi: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00303.x
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 26 APR 2005
- Article first published online: 26 APR 2005
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Objective. This study examines how preferences for different types of applicants for admission to elite universities influence the number and composition of admitted students.
Methods. Previous research with these NSCE data employed logistic regression analysis to link information on the admission decision for 124,374 applications to applicants' SAT scores, race, athletic ability, and legacy status, among other variables. Here we use micro simulations to illustrate what the effects might be if one were to withdraw preferences for different student groups.
Results. Eliminating affirmative action would substantially reduce the share of African Americans and Hispanics among admitted students. Preferences for athletes and legacies, however, only mildly displace members of minority groups.
Conclusions. Elite colleges and universities extend preferences to many types of students, yet affirmative action is the one most surrounded by controversy.