SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abrahamsen R 2000 Disciplining Democracy: Development Discourse and Good Governance. London: Zed Books
  • Adams P 1996 Protest and the scale of telecommunications. Political Geography 15: 419442
  • Agnew J 1997 The dramaturgy of horizons: Geographical scale in the “reconstruction of Italy” by the new Italian political parties, 1992–95. Political Geography 16: 99122
  • Bakker K 2004 An Uncooperative Commodity: Privatising Water in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Beck U 1992 Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage
  • Brenner N 2001 The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography 25(4): 591614
  • Bridge G 2000 The social regulation of resource access and environmental impact: Production, nature and contradiction in the US copper industry. Geoforum 31(2): 237256
  • Bridge G and Smith A 2003 Intimate encounters: Culture–economy–commodity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21(3): 257268
  • Bromley D 1991 Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell
  • Brown M 1995 Sex, scale, and the “new urban politics”: HIV-prevention strategies from Yaletown, Vancouver. In DBell and GValentine (eds) Mapping Desire: Geographies of Sexualities(pp 245263). New York: Routledge
  • Buttel F 1992 Environmentalization: Origins, processes, and implications for rural social change. Rural Sociology 57: 127
  • Castree N 2002 Environmental issues I: From policy to political economy. Progress in Human Geography 26(3): 357365
  • Cox K 2002 Globalization, the “regulation approach”, and the politics of scale. In AHerod and MWright (eds) Geographies of Power: Placing Scale(pp 85114). Malden: Blackwell
  • Deere C and Esty D (eds) 2002 Greening the Americas: NAFTA's Lessons for Hemispheric Trade. Cambridge: The MIT Press
  • Delaney D and Leitner H 1997 The political construction of scale. Political Geography 16: 9397
  • Earthjustice 2004 Submission of non-disputing parties Bluewater Network, Communities for a Better Environment and Center for International Environmental Law, in the arbitration under Chapter Eleven of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the UNCITRAL arbitration rules between Methanex Corporation and United States of America. Earthjustice: Oakland, CA
  • Echeverria J and Eby R (eds) 1995 Let the People Judge: Wise Use and the Private Property Rights Movement. Washington, DC: Island Press
  • Epstein R 1985 Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  • Grass G and P Bourdieu 2002 The “progressive” restoration. New Left Review 14: 6377
  • Hardt M 2002 Today's Bandung? New Left Review 14: 112118
  • Herod A 1997 Labor's spatial praxis and the geography of contract bargaining in the US east coast longshore industry, 1953–1989. Political Geography 16: 145170
  • Herod A and Wright M (eds) 2002 Geographies of Power: Placing Scale. Malden: Blackwell
  • IISD 2004 Amicus Curiae submissions in the arbitration under Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement and the UNCITRAL arbitration rules between Methanex Corporation and United States of America. Winnipeg: IISD
  • IISD and World Wildlife Fund 2001 Private rights, public problems: A guide to NAFTA's controversial chapter on investor rights. Winnipeg: IISD
  • Kurtz H 2002 The politics of environmental justice as the politics of scale: St. James Parish, Louisiana and the Shintech Siting Controversy. In AHerod and MWright (eds) Geographies of Power: Placing Scale(pp 249273). Oxford: Blackwell
  • Lam N and Quattrochi D 1992 On the issues of scale, resolution, and fractal analysis in the mapping sciences. Professional Geographer 44: 8898
  • Mann H and Araya M 2002 An investment regime for the Americas: Challenges and opportunities for environmental sustainability. In CDeere and DEsty (eds) Greening the Americas: NAFTA's Lessons for Hemispheric Trade(pp 163180). Cambridge: The MIT Press
  • Mann H and Von Moltke K 2002 Protecting investor rights and the public good: Assessing NAFTA's Chapter 11. Background paper to the 2002 ILSD Tri-National Policy Workshops: Mexico City, 13 March; Ottawa, 18 March; and Washington, DC, 11 April
  • Marston S 2000 The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography 24(2): 219242
  • Marston S and N Smith 2001 States, scales and households: Limits to scale thinking? A response to Brenner. Progress in Human Geography 25(4): 615619
  • Mayer F 2002 Negotiating the NAFTA: Political lessons for the FTAA. In CDeere and DEsty (eds) Greening the Americas: NAFTA's Lessons for Hemispheric Trade(pp 97116). Cambridge: The MIT Press
  • McCarthy J 2004 Privatizing conditions of production: Trade agreements as environmental governance. Geoforum 35: 327341
  • McCarthy J 2005a Commons as counterhegemonic projects. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 16(1): 924
  • McCarthy J 2005b Devolution in the woods: Community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism. Environment and Planning A 37(6): 9951014
  • McCarthy J and Prudham S 2004 Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum 35(3): 275283
  • Miller B 2000 Geography and Social Movements: Comparing Antinuclear Activism in the Boston Area. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
  • Mooney C 2001 Localizing globalization: Can California and other states block plans to expand NAFTA? The American Prospect 12: 2326
  • Newstead C, Reid C and Sparke M 2003 The cultural geography of scale. In KAnderson, MDomosh, SPile and NThrift (eds) Handbook of Cultural Geography(pp 485497). London: Sage
  • O'Connor J 1998 Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism. New York: Guilford
  • Peck J 2002 Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography 78(3): 331360
  • Polanyi K 1944 The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart & Company
  • Robertson M 2004 The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35(3): 361373
  • Smith N 1992 Geography, difference, and the politics of scale. In JDoherty, EGraham and MMallek (eds) Postmodernism and the Social Sciences(pp 5779). London: MacMillan
  • Smith N 1993 Homeless/global: Scaling places. In JBird, BCurtis, TPutnam, GRobertson and LTickner (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change(pp 87119). New York: Routledge
  • Smith N 1995 Remaking scale: Competition and cooperation in prenational and postnational Europe. In HEskelinen and FSnickars (eds) Competitive European Peripheries(pp 5974). Berlin: Springer
  • Smith N 2000 Scale. In RJohnston, DGregory, GPratt and MWatts (eds) The Dictionary of Human Geography(pp 724727). 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell
  • Staeheli L 1994 Empowering political struggle: Spaces and scales of resistance. Political Geography 13: 387391
  • Swyngedouw E 1997 Neither global nor local: “Glocalization” and the politics of scale. In KCox (ed) Spaces of Globalization(pp 137166). New York: Guilford
  • Taylor P and Buttel F 1992 How do we know we have environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse. Geoforum 23(3): 405416
  • Tickell A and Peck J 2003 Making global rules: Globalization or neoliberalization? In JPeck and HWai-Chung Yeung (eds) Remaking the Global Economy: Economic–Geographical Perspectives(pp 163181). London: Sage
  • Torres B 2002 The North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation: Rowing upstream. In CDeere and DEsty (eds) Greening the Americas: NAFTA's Lessons for Hemispheric Trade(pp 201220). Cambridge: The MIT Press
  • Whatmore S 2002 Hybrid Geographies. London: Sage