• Andersson, M. (1981) On optimal predator search. Theoretical Population Biology 19, 5886.
  • Bookstein, F.L. (1991) Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Ehlinger, T.J. (1989) Learning and individual variation in bluegill foraging: habitat-specific techniques. Animal Behaviour 38, 643658.
  • Ehlinger, T.J. (1990) Habitat choice and phenotype-limited feeding efficiency in bluegill: individual differences and trophic polymorphism. Ecology 71, 886896.
  • Ehlinger, T.J. & Wilson, D.S. (1988) Complex foraging polymorphism in bluegill sunfish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 85, 18781882.
  • Eklöv, P. (1992) Group foraging versus solitary foraging efficiency in piscivorous predators: the perch, Perca fluviatilis, and pike, Esox lucius, patterns. Animal Behaviour 44, 313326.
  • Gendron, R.P. (1986) Searching for cryptic prey: evidence for optimal search rates and the formation of search images in quail. Animal Behaviour 34, 898912.
  • Gendron, R.P. & Staddon, J.E.R. (1983) Searching for cryptic prey: the effect of search rate. American Naturalist 121, 172186.
  • Gendron, R.P. & Staddon, J.E.R. (1984) A laboratory simulation of foraging behavior: the effect of search rate on the probability of detecting prey. American Naturalist 124, 407415.
  • Hjelm, J., Svanbäck, R., Byström, P., Persson, L. & Wahlström, E. (2001) Diet-dependent body morphology and ontogenetic reaction norms in Eurasian perch. Oikos 95, 311323.
  • Marcus, L., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P. & Slice, D.E. (1996) Advances in Morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Norton, S.F. (1991) Capture success and diet of cottid fishes: the role of predator morphology and attack kinematics. Ecology 72, 18071819.
  • Norton, S.F. (1995) A functional approach to ecomorphological patterns of feeding in cottid fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 44, 6178.
  • Robinson, B.W., Wilson, D.S. & Shea, G.O. (1996) Trade-offs of ecological specialization: an intraspecific comparison of pumpkinseed sunfish phenotypes. Ecology 77, 170178.
  • Rohlf, F.J. (1993a) TPSRW: Thin-Plate Spline Relative Warp Analysis. Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York. Free computer software available online at:
  • Rohlf, F.J. (1993b) Relative warp analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. Contributions to Morphometrics (eds L.F.Marcus, E.Bello & A.Garcia-Valdescasas), pp. 131159. Monografias del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid.
  • Schluter, D. (1993) Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks: size, shape, and habitat use efficiency. Ecology 74, 699709.
  • Schluter, D. (1995) Adaptive radiation in sticklebacks: trade-offs in feeding performance and growth. Ecology 76, 8290.
  • Skúlason, S. & Smith, T.B. (1995) Resource polymorphism in vertebrates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10, 366370.
  • Slice, D.E. (1994) DS-DIGIT: Basic Digitizing Software. Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York. Free computer software available online at:
  • Smith, T.B. (1987) Bill size polymorphism and intraspecific niche utilization in an African finch. Nature 329, 717719.
  • Svanbäck, R. & Eklöv, P. (2002) Effects of habitat and food resources on morphology and ontogenetic trajectories in perch. Oecologia 131, 6170.
  • Svanbäck, R. & P Eklöv, , P. (2003) Morphology dependent foraging efficiency in perch: a trade-off for ecological specialization. Oikos 102, 273284.
  • Webb, P.W. (1984) Body form, locomotion and foraging in aquatic vertebrates. American Zoologist 24, 107120.