SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Alhakami, A. S., & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 10851096.
  • Barett, L. F., & Salovey, P. (Eds.). (2002). The Wisdom in Feeling. New York : Guilford.
  • Baron, J. (1997). Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 301309.
  • Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York : Guilford.
  • Clark, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (Eds.). (1982). Affect and Cognition. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York : Avon.
  • De Groot, A. D. (1978). Thought and Choice in Chess. New York : Monton.
  • Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819829.
  • Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709724.
  • Fetherstonhaugh, D., Slovic, P., Johnson, S. M., & Friedrich, J. (1997). Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 282300.
  • Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 117.
  • Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2003). Judgment and decision making: The dance of affect and reason. In S. L.Schneider & J.Shanteau (Eds.). Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research (pp. 327364). Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127152.
  • Forgas, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Friedrich, J., Barnes, P., Chapin, K., Dawson, I., Garst, V., & Kerr, D. (1999). Psychophysical numbing: When lives are valued less as the lives at risk increase. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8, 277299.
  • Ganzach, Y. (2001). Judging risk and return of financial assets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 353370.
  • Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (1998). The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 13501363.
  • Goldstein, W. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1987). Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review, 94, 236254.
  • Hendrickx, L., Vlek, C., & Oppewal, H. (1989). Relative importance of scenario information and frequency information in the judgment of risk. Acta Psychologica, 72, 4163.
  • Hsee, C. K., & Menon, S. (1999). Affection Effect in Consumer Choices. Unpublished study, University of Chicago .
  • Hsee, C. K., & Menon, S. (2000). The affection effect in insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20, 141159.
  • Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In M.Lewis & J. M.Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 261277). New York : Guilford Press.
  • Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision Making. New York : Free Press.
  • Jenni, K. E., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining the “identifiable victim effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 235258.
  • Johnson, E. J., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 2031.
  • Kahneman, D. (1994). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150, 1836.
  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T.Gilovich, D.Griffin, & D.Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 4981). New York : Cambridge University Press.
  • Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., & Sunstein, C. R. (1998). Shared outrage and erratic awards: The psychology of punitive damages. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 16, 4986.
  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York : Cambridge University Press.
  • Kahneman, D., & Snell, J. (1990). Predicting utility. In R. M.Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in Decision Making (pp. 295310). Chicago : University of Chicago .
  • Kahneman, D., & Snell, J. (1992). Predicting a changing taste. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5, 187200.
  • Le Doux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New York : Simon & Schuster.
  • Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551578.
  • Loewenstein, G. F. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272292.
  • Loewenstein, G. F. (1999). A visceral account of addiction. In J.Elster & O-J.Skog (Eds.), Getting Hooked: Rationality and Addiction (pp. 235264). London : Cambridge University Press.
  • Loewenstein, G. F., & Schkade, D. (1999). Wouldn't it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In E.Diener, N.Schwartz, & D.Kahneman (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 85105). New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, E. S. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267286.
  • Mellers, B. A. (2000). Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 910924.
  • Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423429.
    Direct Link:
  • Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning Theory and Behavior. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
  • National Research Council. Committee on Risk Characterization. (1996). Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington , DC : National Academy Press.
  • New York Times. (2001). Philip Morris issues apology for Czech study on smoking. New York Times, July 27, C12.
  • Ordóñez, L., & Benson, L., III. (1997). Decisions under time pressure: How time constraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(2), 121140.
  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). A theory of explanation-based decision making. In G.Klein, J.Orasano, R.Calderwood, & C. E.Zsambok (Eds.), Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods (pp. 188204). Norwood , NJ : Ablex.
  • Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 14651475.
  • Phillips, L. D. (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica, 56, 2948.
  • Rottenstreich, Y., & Hsee, C. K. (2001). Money, kisses and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of probability weighting. Psychological Science, 12(3), 185190.
    Direct Link:
  • Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (1993). Disgust. In M.Lewis & J. M.Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 575594). New York : Guilford.
  • Sandman, P. (1989). Hazard versus outrage in the public perception of risk. In V. T.Covello, D. B.McCallum, & M. T.Pavlova (Eds.), Effective Risk Communication: The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations (pp. 4549). New York : Plenum Press.
  • Sanfey, A., & Hastie, R. (1998). Does evidence presentation format affect judgment? An experimental evaluation of displays of data for judgments. Psychological Science, 9(2), 99103.
    Direct Link:
  • Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In K.Fiedler & J.Forgas (Eds.), Affect, Cognition, and Social Behavior (pp. 4462). Toronto : Hogrefe International.
  • Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 322.
  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280285.
  • Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689701.
  • Slovic, P. (2001). Cigarette smokers: Rational actors or rational fools? In P.Slovic (Ed.), Smoking: Risk, Perception, and Policy (pp. 97124). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T.Gilovich, D.Griffin, & D.Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 397420). New York : Cambridge University Press.
  • Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1968). Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 78(3, Pt. 2), 118.
  • Slovic, P., MacGregor, D. G., Malmfors, T., & Purchase, I. F. H. (1997). Influence of Affective Processes on Toxicologists' Judgments of Risk. Unpublished Study. Eugene , OR : Decision Research.
  • Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D. M. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instructions, and employing probability vs. frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24(3), 271296.
  • Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, Imagery, and Consciousness: Vol. 1. The Positive Affects. New York : Springer.
  • Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Affect, Imagery, and Consciousness: Vol. 2. The Negative Affects. New York : Springer.
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207232.
  • Viscusi, W. K. (1992). Smoking: Making the Risky Decision. New York : Oxford University Press.
  • Wiener, J. B. (2002). Precaution in a multirisk world. In D. J.Paustenbach (Ed.), Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Theory and Practice (pp. 15091531). New York : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Wilson, T. D., Lisle, D. J., Schooler, J. W., Hodges, S. D., Klaaren, K. J., & LaFleur, S. J. (1993). Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(3), 331339.
  • Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 495506.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151175.