SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abramson, A. J., Tobin, M. S., & Van der Groot, M. R. 1995. The changing geography of metropolitan opportunity: The segregation of the poor in US metropolitan areas, 1970–1990. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 4572.
  • Alexander, M. 2003. Host-stranger relations in Rome, Tel Aviv, Paris and Amsterdam: A comparison of local policies towards labour migrants. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
  • Andersson, R. 1998. Socio-spatial dynamics: Ethnic divisions of mobility and housing in post-Palme Sweden. Urban Studies, 35(3), 397428.
  • Andersson, R. 2001. Spaces of socialization and social network competition: A study of neighbourhood effects in Stockholm, Sweden. In H. T.Andersen & R.Van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation and urban governance(pp. 149188). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Andersson, R., & Musterd, S. (in press). Social mix and social perspectives in post-war housing estates. In R.Van Kempen, K.Dekker, S.Hall, & I.Tosics (Eds.), Restructuring large Housing Estates in European Cities. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
  • Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. 2001. Disentangling area effects: Evidence from deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12), 22772298.
  • Brevik, I. 2001. Income inequalities and socio-economic segregation in Oslo: Governance by the market. In H. T.Andersen & R.Van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance(pp. 211232). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Briggs, X. de S. 1997. Moving up versus moving out: Neighbourhood effects in housing mobility programmes. Housing Policy Debates, 8, 195234.
  • Briggs, X. de S. 2003. Re-shaping the geography of opportunity. Housing Studies, 18(6), 915936.
  • Burgers, J., & Musterd, S. 2002. Understanding urban inequality: A model based on existing theories and an empirical illustration. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(2), 403413.
  • Burtless, G., & Jencks, C. 2003. American inequality and its consequences. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
  • Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, n.d. StatLine. Available: http://www.statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/[March 2005].
  • Clark, W. A. V. 1988. Understanding residential segregation in American cities: Interpreting the evidence. Population Research and Policy Review, 7, 113121.
  • Clark, W. A. V. 1989. Residential segregation in American cities: Common ground and differences in interpretation. Population Research and Policy Review, 8, 193197.
  • Dawkins, C. J. 2004. Recent evidence on the continuing causes of black-white residential segregation. Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(3), 379400.
  • Domburg-de Rooij, T., & Musterd, S. 2002. Ethnic segregation and the welfare state. In I.Schnell & W.Ostendorf (Eds.), Studies in segregation and desegregation(pp. 107131). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Droogleever, F. J., Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. 1998. International migration and ethnic segregation: Impacts on urban areas. Urban Studies, 35(3), 367370.
  • Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. 1955. Residential distribution and occupational stratification. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 493503.
  • Ellen, I., & Turner, M. 1997. Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence, Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 833866.
  • Farwick, A. 2002. Segregierte armut und soziale benachteiligung. In A.Mayr, M.Meurer, & J.Vogt (Eds.), Stadt und region: Dynamik von Lebenswelten(pp. 292305). Leipzig: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geographie.
  • Fassmann, H., & Reeger, U. 2001. Immigration to Vienna and Munich: Similarities and differences. In H. T.Andersen & R.Van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation and urban governance(pp. 273295). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Friedrichs, J. 1998. Ethnic segregation in Cologne, Germany, 1984–1994. Urban Studies 35(10), 17451763.
  • Friedrichs, J., & Blasius, J. 2003. Social norms in distressed neighbourhoods: Testing the Wilson hypothesis. Housing Studies, 18(6), 807826.
  • Friedrichs, J., Galster, G., & Musterd, S. 2003. Neighbourhood effects on social opportunities: The European and American research and policy context. Housing Studies, 18(6), 797806.
  • Galster, G. 1988. Residential segregation in American cities: A contrary review. Population Research and Policy Review, 7, 93112.
  • Galster, G. 1989. Residential segregation in American cities: A further response to Clark. Population Research and Policy Review, 8, 181192.
  • Galster, G. 2002. Trans-Atlantic perspectives on opportunity, deprivation and the housing nexus. Housing Studies, 17(1), 512.
  • Galster, G., & Killen, S. 1995. The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework, Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 743.
  • Galster, G., & Zobel, A. 1998. Will dispersed housing programmes reduce social problems in the US? Housing Studies, 13(5), 605622.
  • Goetz, E. G. 2002. Forced relocation vs. voluntary mobility: The effects of dispersal programmes on households. Housing Studies, 17(1), 107123.
  • Iceland, J., Weinberg, D. H., & Steinmetz, E. 2002. US Census Bureau, Series CENSR-3, Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/resseg/papertoc.html[February 2005].
  • Jacquier, C. 2001. Urban fragmentation and revitalization policies in France: A new urban governance in the making. In H. T.Andersen & R.Van Kempen (Eds.), Governing European cities: Social fragmentation, social exclusion and urban governance(pp. 321346). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Jargowsky, P. 1997. Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Jargowsky, P. 2003. Stunning progress, hidden problems: Concentrated poverty in the 1990s. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
  • Kearns, A. 2002. Response: From residential disadvantage to opportunity? Reflections on British and European policy and research. Housing Studies, 17(1), 145150.
  • Kesteloot, C., & Van der Haegen, H. 1997. Foreigners in Brussels 1981–1991: Spatial continuity and social change. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 88(2), 105119.
  • Kesteloot, C., Van Weesep, J., & White, P. 1997. Minorities in West European cities. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 88(2), 99104.
  • Kruythoff, H. M., & Baart, B. 1998. Towards undivided cities in Western Europe. New challenges for urban policy, part 6 Lille. Delft: Delft University Press.
  • Kuttner, R. 1984. The economic illusion: False choices between prosperity and social justice. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. 2000. The neighbourhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309337.
  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. 1993. American apartheid. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Musterd, S. 2003. Segregation and integration: A contested relationship. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(4), 623641.
  • Musterd, S., & Andersson, R. 2003, September. Employment, social mobility and neighbourhood effects. Paper presented at the International Sociological Association, Research Committee 21 Conference “Challenging Urban Identities,” Milan.
  • Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (Eds.). 1998. Urban segregation and the welfare state: Inequality and exclusion in Western cities. London: Routledge.
  • Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. 2003. Understanding segregation in the metropolitan area of Amsterdam. In S.Musterd & W.Salet (Eds.), Amsterdam human capital(pp. 181197). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Musterd, S., Ostendorf, W., & Breebaart, M. 1998. Multi-ethnic metropolis: Patterns and policies. Dordrecht/London/Boston: Kluwer.
  • Musterd, S., Ostendorf, W., & Vos, S. de. 2003. Environmental effects and social mobility. Housing Studies, 18(6), 877892.
  • Musterd, S., Priemus, H., & Van Kempen, R. 1999. Towards undivided cities: The potential of economic revitalisation and housing redifferentiation. Housing Studies, 14(5), 573584.
  • National Statistics. (n.d.). Census 2001. Available: http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/[March 2005].
  • Peach, C. 1996. Does Britain have ghettos? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21, 216235.
  • Peach, C. (with Glazer, N.). 1999. London and New York: Contrasts in British and American models of segregation. International Journal of Population Geography, 5, 319351.
  • Petsimeris, P. 1998. Urban decline and the new social and ethnic divisions in the core cities of the Italian industrial triangle. Urban Studies, 35(3), 449465.
  • Rosenbaum, J. 1995. Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux program. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 231269.
  • Sampson, R., Morenoff, J., & Gannon-Rowley, T. 2002. Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443478.
  • Sassen, S. 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Smeeding, T. M., & Grodner, A. 2000. Changing income inequalities in OECD Countries: Updated results from the Luxemburg Income Survey (LIS). Syracuse, NY: Centre for Policy Research, The Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
  • Van Beckhoven, E., & Van Kempen R. 2003. Social effects of urban restructuring: A case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 18(6), 853874.
  • Van Daalen, G., Deurloo, R., & Musterd, S. 1995. Segregatie op microniveau. Amsterdam: AME, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
  • Van Kempen, R., & Özüekren, A. Ô. 1998. Ethnic segregation in cities: New forms and explanations in a dynamic world. Urban Studies, 35, 16311656.
  • Wacquant, L. J. D. 1993. Urban outcasts: Stigma and division in the black American ghetto and the French urban periphery. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 17, 366383.
  • Wilson, W. J. 1987. The truly disadvantaged, the inner city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.