SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amarasekare, P.. 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol. Lett. 6: 1109.
  • Anon., . 2004. R: a language and environment for statistical computing R Development Core Team, 2.1.0, http://www.R-project.org.
  • Anselin, L.. 1988. Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer.
  • Anselin, L.. 2002. Under the hood. Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricult. Econ. 27: 247267.
  • Anselin, L.. 2003. An introduction to spatial regression analysis in R. <http://sal.uiuc.edu/stuff/stuff-sum/pdf/spdepintro.pdf/view>.
  • Anselin, L. et al. 2005. GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geogr. Analysis in press.
  • Augusto, L. et al. 2000. Impact of forest tree species on feldspar weathering rates. Geoderma 96: 215237.
  • Benton, T. G. et al. 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 182188.
  • Bruun, H. H. et al. 2003. Environmental correlates of meso-scale plant species richness in the province of Härjedalen, Sweden. Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 20252041.
  • Burnett, M. R. et al. 1998. The influence of geomorphological heterogeneity on biodiversity I. A patch-scale perspective. Conserv. Biol. 12: 363370.
  • Clough, Y. et al. 2005. Spider diversity in cereal fields: comparing factors at local, landscape and regional scales. J. Biogeogr. 32: 20072014.
  • Crawley, M. J. and Harral, J. E.. 2001. Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. Science 291: 864868.
  • Deutschewitz, K. et al. 2003. Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 299311.
  • Dupouey, J. L. et al. 2002. Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83: 29782984.
  • Eastman, J. R.. 2003. Idrisi Kilimanjaro. Clark Univ., MA.
  • Gillet, F. et al. 1999. Influence of tree cover on the diversity of herbaceous communities in subalpine wooded pastures. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2: 4754.
  • Gratwicke, B. and Speight, M. R.. 2005. The relationship between fish species richness abundance and habitat heterogeneity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. J. Fish Biol. 66: 650667.
  • Gustafson, E. J.. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art?. Ecosystems 1: 143156.
  • He, F. et al. 1994. Diversity pattern and spatial scale: a study of a tropical rain forest of Malaysia. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 1: 265286.
  • He, F. L. and Gaston, K. J.. 2000. Occupancy-abundance relationships and sampling scales. Ecography 23: 503511.
  • Hurtt, G. C. and Pacala, S. W.. 1995. The consequences of recruitment limitation: reconciling chance, history and competitive differences between plants. J. Theor. Biol. 176: 112.
  • Huston, M. A.. 1994. Biological diversity. The coexistence of species on changing landscapes. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Huston, M. A.. 1999. Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos 86: 393401.
  • Kohler, F. et al. 2006. Spatial and seasonal patterns of cattle habitat use in a mountain wooded pasture. Landscape Ecol. 21: 281295.
  • Kolasa, J. and Rollo, C. D.. 1991. The heterogeneity of heterogeneity: a glossary. – In: Kolasa, J. and Pickett, S. T. A. (eds), Ecological heterogeneity. Springer, pp. 123.
  • Lichstein, J. W. et al. 2002. Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol. Monogr. 72: 445463.
  • Lortie, C. J. et al. 2004. Rethinking plant community theory. Oikos 107: 433438.
  • Lundholm, J. T. and Larson, D. W.. 2003. Relationships between spatial environmental heterogeneity and plant species diversity on a limestone pavement. Ecography 26: 715722.
  • Maggini, R. et al. 2002. A stratified approach for modelling the distribution of the ant species Formica exsecta in the Swiss National Park. Biodiv. Conserv. 11: 21172141.
  • Miller, N. G. and Alpert, P.. 1984. Plant associations and edaphic features of a high artic mesotopographic setting. Arct. Alp. Res. 16: 1124.
  • Morzaria-Luna, H. et al. 2004. Relationship between topographic heterogeneity and vegetation patterns in a Californian salt marsh. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 523530.
  • Olff, H. and Ritchie, M. E.. 1998. Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 261265.
  • Palmer, M. W.. 1988. Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial patterns of plant communities. Vegetatio 75: 91102.
  • Palmer, M. W.. 1992. The coexistence of species in fractal landscapes. Am. Nat. 139: 375397.
  • Pellet, J. et al. 2004. A concentric analysis of the impact of urbanization on the threatened European tree frog in an agricultural landscape. Conserv. Biol. 18: 15991606.
  • Pollock, M. M. et al. 1998. Plant species richness in riparian wetlands – a test of biodiversity theory. Ecology 79: 94105.
  • Rosenzweig, M. L.. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Sabo, J. L. et al. 2005. Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more species. Ecology 86: 5662.
  • Sarr, D. A. et al. 2005. A hierarchical perspective of plant diversity. Q. Rev. Biol. 80: 187212.
  • Shmida, A. and Wilson, M. V.. 1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. J. Biogeogr. 12: 120.
  • Statzner, B. and Moss, B.. 2004. Linking ecological function, biodiversity and habitat: a mini-review focusing on older ecological literature. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5: 97106.
  • Steiner, N. C. and Köhler, W.. 2003. Effects of landscape patterns on species richness: a modelling approach. Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 353361.
  • Swanson, F. J. et al. 1988. Landform effects on ecosystem pattern and processes. BioScience 38: 9298.
  • Tilman, D.. 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75: 216.
  • Tilman, D.. 2004. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 1085410861.
  • Tilman, D. and Kareiva, P.. 1997. Spatial ecology. The role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions. Princeton Univ. Press.
  • Vittoz, P.. 1998. Flore et végétation du Parc jurassien vaudois: typologie, écologie et dynamique des milieux Ph.D. thesis, Univ. de Lausanne, Lausanne.
  • Vivian-Smith, G.. 1997. Microtopographic heterogeneity and floristic diversity in experimental wetland communities. J. Ecol. 85: 7182.
  • Wagner, H. H. and Fortin, M.-J.. 2005. Spatial analysis of landscapes: concepts and statistics. Ecology 86: 19751985.
  • Williams, S. E. et al. 2002. Spatial scale, species diversity, and habitat structure: small mammals in australian tropical rain forest. Ecology 83: 13171329.
  • Willis, K. J. and Whittaker, R. J.. 2002. Species diversity – scale matters. Science 295: 12451248.
  • Wohlgemuth, T.. 1998. Modelling floristic species richness on a regional scale: a case study in Switzerland. Biodiv. Conserv. 7: 159177.
  • Zobel, K. et al. 1994. An experimental test of diversity maintenance mechanisms by a species removal experiment in a species-rich wooded meadow. Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 29: 449457.