The Effect of Supraphysiologic Levels of Iodine on Patients with Cyclic Mastalgia
Article first published online: 5 JUL 2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21341.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kessler, J. H. (2004), The Effect of Supraphysiologic Levels of Iodine on Patients with Cyclic Mastalgia. The Breast Journal, 10: 328–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21341.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 5 JUL 2004
- Article first published online: 5 JUL 2004
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- breast pain;
- cyclic mastalgia;
- iodine;
- Lewin breast pain scale;
- mastalgia;
- molecular iodine
Abstract: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted with 111 otherwise healthy euthyroid women with a history of breast pain. Patients had to document moderate or severe breast pain by recording a score ≥5 on a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain for ≥6 days per cycle and had to present with fibrosis involving at least 25% of both breast surfaces. Subjects could not be effectively treated with more conservative measures such as local heat or nonprescription analgesics. There was not a statistically significant difference in the dropout rate for patients on placebo (11.8%), 1.5 mg/day (31.3%), 3.0 mg/day (18.4%), or 6.0 mg/day (25%) of molecular iodine for 6 months. Physicians assessed breast pain, tenderness, and nodularity each cycle; patients assessed breast pain and tenderness with the Lewin breast pain scale at 3-month intervals and with a VAS at each cycle. A statistically significant improvement (p < 0.01) associated with dose was observed in the Lewin overall pain scale for all treated groups compared to placebo. Reductions in all three physician assessments were observed in patients after 5 months of therapy in the 3.0 mg/day (7/28; 25%) and 6.0 mg/day (15/27; 18.5%) treatment groups, but not the 1.5 mg/day or placebo group. Patients recorded statistically significant decreases in pain by month 3 in the 3.0 and 6.0 mg/day treatment groups, but not the 1.5 mg/day or placebo group; more than 50% of the 6.0 mg/day treatment group recorded a clinically significant reduction in overall pain. All doses were associated with an acceptable safety profile. No dose-related increase in any adverse event was observed.

1524-4741/asset/TBJ_left.gif?v=1&s=7478b27672abc1038f83e606fe8e81ab18a20fc7)
1524-4741/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=a4adbbe8426dfbcd00ece2e3eeca21da69722910)