SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bachmann, D., Elfrink, J., & Vazzana, G. (1996). Tracking the progress of e-mail vs. snail-mail. Marketing Research, 8(2), 3035.
  • Comley, P. (1996). The use of the Internet as a data collection method, [Online] Available: WWW URL http://www.sga.co.uk/esomar.html.
  • FIND/SVP. (1995). The American Internet users survey, [Online] Available: WWW URL http://etrg.findsvp.com/index.html.
  • Gjestland, L. (1996). Net? Not yet. Marketing Research, 8(1), 2629.
  • Kehoe, C. M., & Pitkow, J. E. (1996). Surveying the territory: GVU's five WWW user surveys. The World Wide Web Journal, 1(3). [Also Online]. Available: WWW URL http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/papers/w3j.html.
  • Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 82101.
  • Kittleson, M. J. (1995). An assessment of the response rate via the postal service and e-mail. Health Values, 18(2), 2729.
  • Lemay, L., Murphy, B. K., & Smith, E. T. (1996). Creating commercial web pages Indianapolis , IN : Sams net Publishing.
  • Mehta, R., & Sivadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37(4), 429439.
  • Nielsen Media Research/CommerceNet. (1995). The CommerceNet Nielsen Internet Demographics Survey, [Online] Available: WWW URL http://www.nielsenmedia.com/.
  • O'Reilly Research. (1995). Defining the Internet Opportunity, [Online] Available: WWW URL http://www.ora.com/www/research/users/index.html.
  • Palmquist, J., & Stueve, A. (1996). Stay plugged in to new opportunities. Marketing Research, 8(1), 1315.
  • Parker, L. (1992, July). Collecting data the e-mail way. Training and Development, 5254.
  • Patrick, A. S., Black, A., & Whalen, T. E. (1995). Rich, young, male, dissatisfied computer geeks? Demographics and satisfaction from the National Capital FreeNet. In D.Godfrey & M.Levy (Eds.), Proceedings of Telecommunities 95: The International Community Networking Conference (pp. 83107). Victoria, British Columbia, Canada : Telecommunities Canada. [Also Online]. Available: http://debra.dgbt.doc.ca:80/services-research/survey/demographics/vic.html.
  • Pitkow, J. E., & Recker, M. M. (1994). Using the web as a survey tool: Results from the second WWW user survey. Journal of Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 27 (6). [Also Online]. Available: WWW URL http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/papers/survey_2_paper.html.
  • Quarterman, J. S. (1996). Summary: Third Internet demographic survey (MIDS3), [Online] Available: WWW URL http://www3.mids.org/mn/603/ids3sum.html.
  • Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S., & Edwards, J. E. (1993). Computer-administered surveys in organizational settings: alternatives, advantages, and applications. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(4), 485511.
  • Schuldt, B., & Totten, J. (1994). Electronic mail vs. mail survey response rates. Marketing Research, 6, 3639.
  • Sproull, L. S. (1986). Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 159169.
  • Tse, A. C. B., Tse, K. C., Yin, C. H., Ting, C. B., Yi, K. W., Yee, K. P., & Hong, W. C. (1995). Comparing two methods of sending out questionnaires: E-mail versus mail. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37(4), 441446.