SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (S. F.Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor , MI : University of Michigan Press. Originally published in 1981.
  • Bate, B. (1988). Communication and the sexes New York : Harper and Row.
  • Bechar-Israeli, H. (1995). From <Bonehead> TO <cLoNehEAd>: Nicknames, play, and identity on Internet Relay Chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, [Online], 1 (2). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue2/bechar.html.
  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality New Haven , CT : Yale University Press.
  • Bing, J.M., & Bergvall, V.L. (1996). The question of questions: Beyond binary thinking. In V.L.Bergvall, J.M.Bing, & A.F.Freed, (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice (pp. 130). New York : Longman.
  • Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg's dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [Online], 3 (2). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/biocca.html.
  • Bornstein, K. (1995). Gender outlaw: On men, women, and the rest of us New York : Vintage Books. Originally published in 1994.
  • Bruckman, A. S. (1993). Gender swapping on the Internet. Proceedings of INET93, San Francisco , CA . Available: ftp://ftp.media.mit.edu/pub/asb/papers/
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity New York : Routledge.
  • Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory London : Macmillan. Originally published in 1985.
  • Cameron, D. (1996). The language-gender interface: Challenging co-optation. In V.L.Bergvall, J.M.Bing, & A.F.Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice (pp. 3153).
  • Cameron, D., McAlinden, F., & O'Leary, K. (1989). Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In J.Coates & D.Cameron, (Eds.), Women in their speech communities: N>ew perspectives on language and sex (pp. 7493). New York : Longman.
  • Coates, J. (1986). Women, men, and language: A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language New York : Longman.
  • Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses. Language in Society, 6, 313322.
  • Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M.L. (1987). Information technologies. In F.M.Jablin, L.L.Putman, K.H.Roberts, & L.W.Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420443). Thousand Oaks : Sage.
  • Curtis, P. (1992). Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. Proceedings of Diac92 Available: ftp://ftp.lambda.moo.mud.org/pub/MOO/papers/DIAC92.txt.
  • Danet, B. (1996). Text as mask: Gender and identity on the Internet. Paper presented at the conference, Masquerade and Gendered Identity, Venice, Italy. Available: http://atar.mscc.huji.ac.il/~msdanet/mask.html.
  • Danet, B., Ruedenberg-Wright, L., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (1997). “HMMM…WHERE'S THAT SMOKE COMING FROM?” Writing, play and performance on Internet Relay Chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [Online] 2(4). Available: http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol2/issue4/danet.html.
  • Desnki, S., & Sholle, D. (1992). Metal men and glamour boys: Gender performance in heavy metal. In S.Craig, (Ed.), Men, masculinity, and the media (pp. 4160). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Dickel, M.H. (1995). Bent gender: Virtual disruptions of gender and sexual identity. Electronic Journal of Communication [Online], 5, (4). Available via email message addressed to http://Comserv@cios.org. Message: Send Dickel V5N495.
  • Epstein, J. (1990). Either/or–neither/both: Sexual ambiguity and the ideology of gender. Genders, 7, 99142.
  • Fishman, P. (1983). Interaction: The work women do. In B.Thorne, C.Kramarae, & N.Henley, (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 89101). Rowley , MA : Newbury House. Originally published in 1978.
  • Freed, A.F. (1996). Language and gender research in an experimental setting. In V.L.Bergvall, J.M.Bing, & A.F.Freed (Eds.), Rethinking language and gender research (pp. 5476).
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice-Hall.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life Garden City , NY : Doubleday Anchor Books.
  • Graddol, D., & Swan, J. (1989). Gender voices Cambridge , MA : Basil Blackwell.
  • Gromala, D. (1996). Pain and subjectivity in virtual reality. In L.H.Leeson, (Ed.), Clicking in: Hot links to a digital culture(pp. 222237). Seattle : Bay Press.
  • Herring, S.C. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication [Online], 3 (2). Available via email message addressed to http://Comserv@cios.org. Message: Send Herring V3N293.
  • Herring, S.C., Johnson, D., & Dibenedetto, T. (1992). Participation in electronic discourse in a “feminist” field. In K.Hall, M.Bucholtz, & B.Moonwomon, (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Berkeley California (pp. 250262).
  • Jaffe, J.M., Lee, Y., Huang, L., & Oshagan, H. (1995). Gender, pseudonyms, and CMC: Masking identities and baring souls Paper submitted to the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Available: http://research.haifa.ac.il/~jmjaffe/genderpseudocmc.html.
  • James, D., & Drakich, J. (1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In D.Tannen, (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 281312). New York : Oxford University Press.
  • Jespersen, O. (1990). The woman. In Cameron, D., (Ed.), The feminist critique of language: A reader (pp. 201220). New York : Routledge. Originally published in 1922.
  • Jones, D. (1980). Gossip: Notes on women's oral culture. In C.Kramarae, (Ed.), The voices and words of women and men (pp. 193198). Oxford : Pergamon Press.
  • Kane, P. (1994). The hitchhiker's guide to the electronic highway New York : MIS: Press.
  • Kaplan, N., & Farrell, E. (1994). Weavers of webs: A portrait of young women on the net. The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture [Online], 2 (3). Available via e-mail message addressed to http://LISTSERV@KENTVM.KENT.EDU Leave subject line empty. Message: GET EJVCV2N3 CONTENTS.
  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T.W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist (39) 10, 11231134.
  • Kramarae, C., & Taylor, H.J. (1993). Women and men on electronic networks: A conversation or a monologue? In H.J.Taylor, C.Kramarae, & M.Ebben, (Eds.), Women, information technology and scholarship (pp. 5261). Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign .
  • Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place New York : Harper and Row.
  • Maltz, D.N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J.J.Gumperz, (Ed.), Language and social identity (pp. 195216). Cambridge , MA : Cambridge University Press.
  • Matheson, K. (1991). Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 137145.
  • Mulac, A., & Lundell, T.L. (1986). Linguistic contributors to the gender-linked language effect. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5(2), 81101.
  • Mulac, A., Wiemann, J.M., Widenmann, S.J., & Gibson, T.W. (1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: The gender-linked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 315335.
  • Nichols, P. (1983). Linguistic options and choices for black women in the rural South. In B.Thorne, C.Kramarae, & N.Henley (Eds.), Language, Gender and Society (pp. 5468). Rowley , MA : Newbury House Publishers.
  • Nicholson, L. (1994). Interpreting gender. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 20(1). 79105.
  • Nietzsche, F. (1989). On the genealogy of morals, W.Kaufman & R.J.Hollingdale (Trans.). New York : Vintage Books. Originally published in 1967.
  • O'Barr, W. M., & Atkins, B.K. (1980). “Women's language” or “powerless language”? In S.McConnell-Ginet, R.Borker, & N.Furman, (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 93110). New York : Praeger.
  • Petersen, J. (1994). Sex and the cybergirl: When Mother Jones stepped out onto the electronic superhighway, so did a few cyberpigs. Mother Jones, May-June. Available: http://www.mojones.com/mother_jones/MJ94/petersen.html.
  • Quina, K., Wingard, J.A., & Bates, H.G. (1987). Language style and gender stereotypes in person perception. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11 111122.
  • Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (Coordinators) (1993). ProjectH codebook. [Online]. Available: http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/~fay/projecth/codebook.html.
  • Reid, E. (1993). Electronic chat: Social issues on Internet Relay Chat. Media Information Australia, 67, 6270.
  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631660.
  • Rheingold, H. (1994). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier New York : HarperPerennial. Originally published in 1993.
  • Savicki, V., Lingenfelter, D., & Kelley, M. (1996). Gender language style and group composition in Internet discussion groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [Online], 2 (3). Available: http://ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue3/savicki.html.
  • Selfe, C.L., & Meyer, P.R. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8(2), 163192.
  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications New York : John and Wiley Sons.
  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427459.
  • Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the Net: Women, power and cyberspace North Melbourne : Spinifex.
  • Sproull, L., & Kielser, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Swann, J. (1989). Talk control: An illustration from the classroom of problems in analysing male dominance of conversation. In J.Coates & D.Cameron, (Eds.), Women in their speech communities (pp. 123140). New York : Longman.
  • Tannen, D. (1991). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation New York : Ballantine Books. Originally published in 1990.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet New York : Simon and Schuster.
  • Walther, J.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 5088.
  • Witmer, D. F., & Katzman, S.L. (1997). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [Online], 2 (4). Available: http://ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/witmer1.html.