SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barbalich, A. (Ed.). (1995). The right tools for the right jobs. Currents, 21, 25.
  • Beauvois, M.H. (1995). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177190.
  • Bruhn, M.J. (1995). E-mail's conversational value. Business Communication Quarterly, 58, 4344.
  • Bull, G., Harris, J., Lloyd, J., & Short, J. (1989). The electronic academical village. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 2731.
  • Cambre, M.A., & Cook, D.L. (1985). Computer anxiety: Definitions, measurement and correlates. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 3754.
  • Chen, G. (1994). The effect of e-mail debate as a teaching tool: A pilot study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans , LA , November 19–22, 1994.
  • Civale, C.M., Jr. (1991). Connecting library and classroom environments via networking. Media and Methods. 27, 3234.
  • Cohen, L. (1994). Augmenting instruction in business communication courses with the Internet. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 57, 3135.
  • Contractor, N.S., & Seibold, D.R. (1993). Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: Adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory. Human Communication Research, 19, 528563.
  • Culnan, M.J., & Markus, M.L. (1987). Information technologies. In F.M.Jablin, L.L.Putnam, K.H.Roberts, & L.W.Porter, (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420443). Newbury Park : Sage.
  • Dyrli, O.E. (1995). Teacher-initiated telecommunications projects. Technology & Learning, 15, 20, 22, 24–26.
  • Forrest, C. (1995). Talking in the library: Channels of communication for library staff. Georgia Librarian, 32, 5052.
  • Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921950.
  • Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Ryu, D. (1995). Cognitive elements in the social construction of communication technology. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 25988.
  • Gilbert, L. (1995). Gains and losses. Currents, 21, 16.
  • Goldman, S.V., & Newman, D. (1992). Electronic interactions: How students and teachers organize schooling. Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 3144.
  • Haley-James, S. (1993). Entries from a new e-mail user's notebook. Computers and Composition, 10, 510.
  • Harris, J. (1995). Educational telecomputing projects: Interpersonal exchanges. Computing Teacher, 22, 6064.
  • Hart, J. (1993). Computer communications for advisors. NACADA Journal, 13, 2733.
  • Hartman, K., Neuwirth, C.M., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., Cochran, C., Palmquist, M., & Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8, 79113.
  • Hatton, D. (1995). Womyn and the “L”: A study of the relationship between communication apprehension, gender, and bulletin boards. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio , TX , November 18–21, 1995.
  • Hearn, T.K. (1997). Tradition and change in quest of excellence. In D.G.Oblinger & S.C.Rush, (Eds.), The learning revolution: The challenge of information technology in the academy (pp. 155162). Bolton , MA : Anker.
  • Hensel, J. (1996). I was attacked online. Communication: Journalism Education Today, 29, 2324.
  • Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication processes and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225252.
  • Hunter, B. (1990). Computer-meditated communications support for teacher collaborations: Researching new contexts for both teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 30, 4649.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 267320.
  • Jackson, M.H. (1997). The meaning of “communication technology”: The technology-context scheme. Communication Yearbook 19 (pp. 229267). Beverly Hills , CA : Sage.
  • Johnson, B.S., & Bayless, M.L. (1993). Using e-mail in business communication classes. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 56, 3739.
  • Kerr, E.B., & Hiltz, S.R. (1982). Computer-mediated communication systems. New York : Academic Press.
  • King, K.M. (1994). Leading classroom discussions: Using computers for a new approach. Teaching Sociology, 22, 17482.
  • Komsky, S.H. (1986). The implementation environment for office automation: Canonical analysis of contextual factors affecting acceptance. Paper presented to the Western Speech Communication Association, Tucson , AZ .
  • Komsky, S.H. (1988). A canonical analysis of acceptance of electronic mail as a medium of communication in a university. Paper presented to the Human Communication Technology Interest Group of the International Communication Association, New Orleans , LA .
  • Komsky, S.H. (1991). A profile of users of electronic mail in a university: Frequent versus occasional users. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 31040.
  • Lincoln, Y.S. (1992). Virtual community and invisible colleges: Alterations in faculty scholarly networks and professional self-image. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Minneapolis , MN , October 28-November 1, 1992.
  • Mabrito, M. (1991). Electronic mail as a vehicle for peer response: Conversations of high- and low-apprehensive writers. Written Communication, 8, 50932.
  • Markee, N. (1994). Using electronic mail to manage the implementation of educational innovations. System, 22, 37989.
  • McCormick, N.B., & McCormick, J.W. (1992). Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates' electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 379405.
  • McGinnis, J.R. (1996). Promoting an electronic community with the use of communication technology in a graduate elementary science methods class. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 8, 3963.
  • Merseth, K.K. (1991). Supporting beginning teachers with computer networks. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 140147.
  • Mueller, F. (1992). Telecommunications: A tool for developing writing and communication skills. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25, 811.
  • Muffo, J., & Conner, M. (1987). Unexpected outcomes of computer usage in higher education. Cause/Effect, 11, 611, 17.
  • Murray, D.E. (1988). Computer-mediated communication: Implications for ESP. English for Special Purposes, 7, 318.
  • Newman, J.M. (1989). Online: From far away. Language Arts, 66, 79197.
  • Noden, H., & Moss, B. (1993). Virtual schools: Reading and writing. Reading Teacher, 47, 16668.
  • Oates, R.H. (1987). Computer-mediated communication for high school classroom. Quill and Scroll, 61, 819.
  • Oblinger, D.G., & Rush, S.G. (1997). The learning revolution. Bolton , MA : Anker.
  • Olaniran, B.A. (1994). Group performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 25681.
  • Olia, F.N., & Martin, D.S. (1994). Ethics and electronic mail: A study at Gallaudet University. TechTrends, 39, 1921.
  • Orlikowski, W.J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 54174.
  • Poling, D.J. (1994). E-mail as an effective teaching supplement. Educational Technology, 34, 5355.
  • Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1987). Group decision making and group decision support systems (MISRC Working Paper Series 88–02). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, MIS Research Center.
  • Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J.Fulk & C.W.Steinfeld, (Eds.), Organizations and communication technologies (pp. 173193). Newbury Park : Sage.
  • Poole, M.S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making. Human Communication Research, 19, 549.
  • Poole, M.S., Holmes, M., Watson, R., & DeSanctis, G. (1993). Group decision support systems and group communication: A comparison of decision making in computer-supported and nonsupported groups. Communication Research, 20, 176213.
  • Poole, M.S., Seibold, D.R., & McPhee, R.D. (1985). Group decision making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74102.
  • Reinsch, N.L., Jr. (1985). Technology aversion (with implications for education and training). Office Systems Research Journal, 4, 920.
  • Rice, C.D. (1996). Bring intercultural encounters in to classrooms: IECC electronic mailing lists. T.H.E. Journal, 23, 6063.
  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York : Free Press (4th Edition).
  • Sargeant, D. (1997). Moving toward a mobile teaching and learning environment: Using notebook computers. In D.G.Oblinger & S.C.Rush, (Eds.), The learning revolution: The challenge of information technology in the academy (pp. 7491). Bolton , MA : Anker.
  • Scott, C.R., & Rockwell, S.C. (1997). The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies. Communication Education, 46, 4462.
  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991a). Computers, networks and work. Scientific American, 265, 116123.
  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991b). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge : MIT Press.
  • Stebelman, S. (1994). Teaching electronic communication skills to graduate students. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 12931.
  • Steinfeld, C.W. (1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In M.L.McLaughlin, (Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 777804). Beverly Hills , CA : Sage.
  • Suozzo, A. (1995). Dialogue and immediacy in cultural instruction: The e-mail option. French Review, 69, 7887.
  • Upitis, R. (1990). Real and contrived uses of electronic mail in elementary schools. Computers and Education, 15, 23343.
  • Vine, R. (1988). Electronic communications: University of Calgary libraries. Canadian Library Journal, 45, 27173.
  • Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated Communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 343.
  • Walther, J.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 5088.
  • Watkins, B.T. (1994). Breaking down barriers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 40, A25, 39.
  • Whitaker, E., & Hill, E. (1996). Teacher talk on e-mail. Action in Teacher Education, 17, 7982.
  • Wilkins, M.L., & Nantz, K. (1995). Faculty use of electronic communication before and after a LAN installation: A three-year analysis. Journal of End User Computing, 7, 411.
  • Yeoman, E. (1995). “Sam's Cafe”: A case study of computer conferencing as a medium for collective journal writing. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 24, 20925.