SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andrews, S., & Feinberg, S. (1999). Developing and implementing effective Web-based surveys STC's 46th annual conference proceedings. Cincinnati , Ohio : Sawtooth Technologies. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.stc-va.org/proceedings/ConfProceed/1999/PDFs/046.pdf (November 21, 2001).
  • Aoki, K., & Elasmar, M. (2000, May). Opportunities and challenges of a Web survey: A field experiment. Paper presented at the 55th annual conference of American association for public opinion research. Portland , Oregon , May 18–21, 2000.
  • Baker, R. P. (1998). The CASIC future In M. P.Couper, R. P.Baker, J.Bethlehem, C. Z. F.Clark, J.Martin, W. L.NichollsII, & J. M.O'Reilly (Eds.). Computer assisted survey information collection (pp. 583604). New York , NY : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bauman, S., Jobity, N., Airey, J., & Atak, H. (2000, May). Invites, intros and incentives: Lessons from a Web survey. Paper presented at the 55th annual conference of American Association for Public Opinion Research. Portland, Oregon, May 18–21, 2000. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.wintellitech.com (November 21, 2001).
  • Bickham, C., & Moore, C. (1999). Combining telephone, mail and the Internet for effective global business to business data capture and management — A case study. Paper presented at the ARF's Week of Workshops, Online Research Workshop. New York, NY, October 4–7 1999.
  • Black, G. S. (1998, May). Internet surveys – A replacement technology. Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. May 1998, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Bosnjak, M., Tuten, T. L., & Bandilla, W. (2001). Participation in Web surveys - A typology. ZUMA Nachrichten, 48, 717.
  • Bowker, D. (1999). Constructing the client-computer interface: Guidelines for design and implementation of Web-based surveys Summary report 99-15. Pullman , WA : Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University.
  • Bowker, D., & Dillman, D. A. (2000, May). An experimental evaluation of left and right oriented screens for Web questionnaires Paper presented at the 55th annual conference of American Association for Public Opinion Research. Portland , Oregon , May 18–21, 2000. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/AAPORpaper00.pdf (November 11, 2001).
  • Brennan, M., Rae, N., & Parackal, M. (1999). Survey-based experimental research via the Web: Some observations. Marketing Bulletin, 10, 8392. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/article10/article9.asp (November 26, 2001).
  • Bunofsky, T. L. (1999, October). Developing and nurturing an online panel. Paper presented at the ARF's Week of Workshops, Online Research Workshop. New York , NY , October 4–7 1999.
  • Clayton, R. L., & Werking, G. S. (1998). Business surveys of the future: The World Wide Web as a data collection methodology. In M. P.Couper, R. P.Baker, J.Bethlehem, C. Z. F.Clark, J.Martin, W. L.NichollsII, & J. M.O'Reilly (Eds.). Computer assisted survey information collection (pp. 543562). New York , NY : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cleland, K. (1996). On-line research costs about half that of traditional methods. Advertising Age's Business Marketing, 81 (4), B89.
  • Comley, P. (1996, November). The use of Internet as a data collection method Paper presented at ESOMAR conference. Edinburg , November, 1996. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.virtualsurveys.com/papers/email.htm (November 21, 2001).
  • Comley, P. (2000). Pop-up surveys. What works, what doesn't work and what will work in the future. Proceedings of the ESOMAR worldwide Internet conference Net Effects 3. Publication series - Volume 237. Amsterdam , NL : ESOMAR. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.virtualsurveys.com/papers/popup_paper.htm (November 21, 2001).
  • Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821836.
  • Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 464494.
  • Couper, M. P., & Nicholls II, W. L. (1998). The history and development of computer assisted survey information collection methods. In M. P.Couper, R. P.Baker, J.Bethlehem, C. Z. F.Clark, J.Martin, W. L.NichollsII, & J. M.O'Reilly (Eds.) Computer assisted survey information collection (pp. 121). New York , NY : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Couper, M. P., Traugott, M., & Lamias, M. (1999). Effective survey administration on the Web. Paper presented at the 1999 MAPOR conference, Chicago , Illinois .
  • Couper, M. P. (1997). Survey introductions and data quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(2), 317338.
  • Couper, M. P. (2001, September). Measurement error in Web surveys. Invited lecture at Methodology and Statistics International conference. Ljubljana, Slovenia, September 17–19, 2001.
  • Couper, M. P., Traugott, M., & Lamias, M. (2000, October). Experiments on the design of Web surveys. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Cologne , Germany , October 3–6, 2000.
  • Couper, M. P., Traugott, M., & Lamias, M. (2001). Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(2), 230253.
  • de Leeuw, E. D. (1992). Data quality in mail, telephone and face-to-face surveys. Amsterdam , NL : TT-Publikaties.
  • Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. The total design method. New York , NY : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Tailored design of mail and other self-administered surveys. New York , NY : Wiley-Interscience.
  • Dillman, D. A., & Bowker, D. K. (2001). The Web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In U.-D.Reips, & M.Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet science (pp. 159178). Lengerich : Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Dillman, D. A., Carley-Baxter, L., & Jackson, A. (1999). Skip pattern compliance in three test forms: A theoretical and empirical evaluation SESRC technical report 99-01, Pullman , WA : Washington state University.
  • Dillman, D. A., Tortora, R. D., & Bowker, D. (1998). Influence of plain vs. fancy design on response rates for Web surveys. The 1998 Proceedings of Section on Survey Research Methods. Dallas, Texas: American Statistical Association. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/asa98ppr.pdf (November 26, 2001).
  • Elder, A. (1999). Power buyers or cautious shoppers? Segmenting the E-commerce market. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference Net Effects (pp. 1534). Amsterdam , NL : ESOMAR.
  • Elder, A., & Incalcatera, T. (2000). Pushing the envelope. Moving a major syndicated study to the Web. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference Net Effects 3. Publication Series - Volume 237. Amsterdam , NL : ESOMAR.
  • Enander, J., & Sajti, A. (1999). Online survey of online customers. Value-added market research through data collection on the Internet. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference Net Effects (pp. 3551). Amsterdam , NL : ESOMAR.
  • Farmer, T. (1998). Using the Internet for primary research data collection Market Research Library. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.researchinfo.com/library/infotek/index.shtml (April 28, 1999).
  • Findlater, A., & Kottler, R. E. (1998). Web interviewing. Validating the application of Web interviewing using a comparative study on the telephone. The Book of Papers from the Worldwide Internet Seminar 1998. Amsterdam , NL : ESOMAR.
  • Fuchs, M. (2001, May). Screen design in a Web survey. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. Montreal , Quebec , May 17–20, 2001.
  • Gräf, L. (2002). Assessing Internet questionnaires: The online pretest lab. In B.Batinic, U.-D.Reips, M.Bosnjak & A.Werner (Eds.) Online social sciences (pp. 7393). Seattle : Hogrefe & Huber (Forthcoming).
  • Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. P. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York , NY : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs. New York , NY : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gupta, S. (1999). Online research: Results from the first Acorn-IIR survey of online research. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.iir.acornis.com/survey (January 5, 2001).
  • Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43, 447462.
  • Hollis, N. S. (1999). Can a picture save 1,000 words? Augmenting telephone tracking with online ad recognition. ARF's Online research day - Towards validation (pp. 4149). New York , NY : Advertising Research Foundation.
  • Internet Rogator (1998). Internet Rogator help with surveying. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.internet-rogator.com/htm/help.htm (November 21, 2001).
  • Jansen, J. H. (1985). Effect of questionnaire layout and size and issue-involvement on response rates in mail surveys. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 139142.
  • Jeavons, A. (1999). Ethology and the Web. Observing respondent behaviour in Web surveys. Proceedings of the ESOMAR worldwide Internet Conference Net Effects (pp. 201213). Amsterdam , NL : ESOMAR. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://w3.one.net/~andrewje/ethology.html (November 21, 2001).
  • Jones Thompson, M. (1999). When market research turns into marketing. The Industry Standard, August 23rd. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,5995,00.html (March 30, 2002).
  • Knapp, F., & Heidingsfelder, M. (2001). Drop-out analysis: Effects of the survey design. In U.-D.Reips, & M.Bosnjak (Eds.) Dimensions of Internet science (pp. 221230). Lengerich : Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Kojetin, B. A., Borgida, E., & Snyder, M. (1993). Survey topic involvement and nonresponse bias. 1993 Proceeding of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Volume II (pp. 838843). Alexandria : American Statistical Association.
  • Kottler, R. E. (1997a, October). Exploiting the research potential of the World Wide Web. Paper presented at Research '97, London, October, 1997. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.spss.com/spssmr/web_bureau/knowledge/r97a.htm (November 21, 2001).
  • Kottler, R. E. (1997b). Search no further. Yahoo!'s audience analysis project - A case study. Quirk's Marketing Research Review, June/July. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.spss.com/spssmr/web_bureau/knowledge/yahooqq.htm (November 21, 2001).
  • Krotki, K. P. (2001, August). Web-based surveys for a nationally representative sample. Paper presented at Joint Statistical Meeting 2001, Atlanta, Georgia, 5–9 August 2001.
  • Kwak, N., & Radler, B. T. (1999, November). A comparison between mail and Web-based surveys: Response pattern, data quality, and characteristics of respondents. Paper presented at 1999 MAPOR Conference, Chicago , Illinois , 19–20 November 1999.
  • Lozar Manfreda, K. (2001). Web survey errors. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Ljubljana : Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana.
  • MacElroy, B. (2000). Measuring response rates in online surveys Quirk's Marketing Research Review, April. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.quirks.com (November 21, 2001).
  • Martin, C. L. (1994). The impact of topic interest on mail survey response behaviour. Journal of the Market Research Society, 36(4), 327338.
  • Nadilo, R. (1999). Online research: The methodology for the next millennium. ARF's online research day - Towards validation (pp. 5051). New York , NY : Advertising Research Foundation.
  • Nichols, E., & Sedivi, B. (1998). Economic data collection via the Web: A Census Bureau case study. 1998 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (pp. 366371). Alexandria : American Statistical Association.
  • Norman, K. L., Friedman, Z., Norman, K., & Stevenson, R. (2001). Navigational issues in the design of online self-administered questionnaires. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20(1), 3745.
  • Onyshkevych, V., & McIndoe, D. (1999, May). Internet technology: Gaining commercial advantage. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. St. Petersburg , Florida , 13–16 May, 1999.
  • Pastore, M. (2001). Online consumers now the average consumer. The cyberAtlas newsletter, July 2001 Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://cyberatlas.internet.com/big_picture/demographics/article/0,5901_800201,00.html (November 21, 2001).
  • Poynter, R. (2001). A guide to best practice in online quantitative research. In A.Westlake et al. (Eds.). The challenge of the Internet. London , UK : Association for Survey Computing.
  • Reips, U.-D. (2002). Context effects in Web-surveys. In B.Batinic, U.-D.Reips, M.Bosnjak. & A.Werner (Eds.) Online social sciences (pp. 95104). Seattle : Hogrefe & Huber (Forthcoming).
  • RIS (19962002). Research on Internet in Slovenia. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.ris.org (March 30, 2002).
  • Roberson, M. T., & Sundstrom, E. (1990). Survey design, return rates, and response favorableness in an employee attitude survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 354357.
  • Sheehan, K. B., and McMillan, S. J. (1999). Response variation in e-mail surveys: An exploration. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(4), 4554.
  • Spaeth, J. (1999). At the dawn of a new day. ARF's online research day - Towards validation (pp. 57). New York , NY : Advertising Research Foundation.
  • Spain, S. W. (1998). Top-10 Web survey issues and how to address them. Market Research Library. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.researchinfo.com/library/top_10_web.shtml (April 28, 1999).
  • Sturgeon, K., & Winter, S. (1999). International marketing on the World Wide Web. New opportunities for research: What works, what does not and what is next. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference Net Effects (pp. 191200). Amsterdam , NL : ESOMAR.
  • Terhanian, G. & Black, G. S. (1999). Understanding the online population: Lessons from the Harris Poll and the Harris Poll Online. ARF's online research day - Towards validation (pp. 2833). New York , NY : Advertising research foundation.
  • Vehovar, V., & Batagelj, Z. (1996). The methodological issues in WWW surveys. Paper presented at CASIC '96, San Antonio, Texas. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.ris.org/casic96/ (March 30, 2002).
  • Vehovar, V., Batagelj, Z., Lozar Manfreda, K., & Zaletel, M. (2002). Nonresponse in Web surveys. In R. M.Groves, D. A.Dillman, J. L.Eltinge, & R. J. A.Little (Eds.) Survey nonresponse (pp. 229242). New York , NY : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Vehovar, V., Lozar Manfreda, K., & Batagelj, Z. (2000). Design issues in WWW surveys. 2000 Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (pp. 983988), Alexandria : American Statistical Association.
  • White, G. K. (1996). An on-line survey of food and beverage consumers on the Internet: An evaluation of the survey methodology. Marketing Research On-line, 1, 3959. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://mro.massey.ac.nz/online3.pdf (November 11, 2001).
  • Whitlock, C. (1997, September). CAWI - Computer assisted Web interviewing. Tautology or innovation? Paper presented at a one-day conference ‘The interview, the Internet, the impact’, organized by ASC, September 30, 1997, London.
  • Willke, J., Adams, C. O., & Girnius, Z. (1999). Internet testing. A landmark study of the differences between mall intercept and on-line interviewing in the United States. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference Net Effects (pp. 145157). Amsterdam , NL : ESOMAR.
  • Zukerberg, A., Nichols, E., & Tedesco, H. (1999, May). Designing surveys for the next millennium: Internet questionnaire design issues. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, St. Petersburg , Florida , 13–16 May, 1999.