SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  • Bargh, J. A. (2002). Beyond simple truths: The human-internet interaction. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 18.
  • Bargh, J. A., Mckenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation of the ‘true self’ in the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 3348.
  • Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2002). Disability discourses for online identities. Disability & Society, 17(3), 327344.
  • Bruckman, A. (1996). Gender swapping on the Internet. In P.Ludlow (Ed.), High noon on the electronic frontier: Conceptual issues in cyberspace (pp. 317326). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London : Routledge.
  • Chesher, C. (1997). The ontology of digital domains. In D.Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace (pp. 7992). London : Sage.
  • Curtis, P. (1996). Mudding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. In P.Ludlow (Ed.), High noon on the electronic frontier: Conceptual issues in cyberspace (pp. 347356). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Davies, B. & Harre, R. (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 4363.
  • Dibbell, J. (1994). A rape in cyberspace: Or, how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society. In M.Dery (Ed.), Flame wars: The discourse of cyberculture (pp. 237261). Durham , NC : Duke University Press.
  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London : Sage.
  • Edwards, P. (1990). The army and the microworld: Computers and the politics of gender identity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 102128.
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London : Tavistock.
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London : Allen Lane.
  • Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction. London : Allen Lane.
  • Frewin, K., & Tuffin, K. (1999). Police status, conformity and internal pressure: A discursive analysis of police culture. Discourse and Society, 9(2), 173185.
  • Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266275.
  • Gersch, B. (1998). Gender at the crossroads: The Internet as cultural text. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 23(3), 306322.
  • Gilbert, G., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientist's discourse. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • Harding, S. (1987). Is there a feminist method? In S.Harding (Ed.), Feminism and methodology: Social science issues (pp. 114). Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
  • Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London : Sage.
  • Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Mirror, mirror?: The importance of looks in everyday life. Albany , NY : State University of New York Press.
  • Heim, M. (1991). The erotic ontology of cyberspace. In M.Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (pp. 5980). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Hyde, D., & Todd, R. (1996). An overview of issues surrounding use of the Internet by people with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 18th World Congress of Rehabilitation International, Auckland , New Zealand .
  • Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177192.
  • Jordan, T. (1999). Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the Internet. London : Routledge.
  • Kendall, L. (1996). I hardly know'er: Adventures of a feminist MUDer. In L.Cherny & E.Weize (Eds.), Wired women (pp. 207223). Seattle , WA : Seal Press.
  • McCormick, N. B., & Leonard, J. (1996). Gender and sexuality in the cyberspace frontier. Women and Therapy, 19(4), 109119.
  • McLuhan, M. (1987). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London : Ark Paperbacks.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 931.
  • Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London : Routledge.
  • Perry, R., & Greber, L. (1990). Women and computers: An introduction. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 74101.
  • Pomeroy, D. (1996, March). My secret life as a women on Internet Relay Chat. New Zealand PC World, 81, 114115.
  • Poster, M. (1995). Postmodern virtualities. In M.Featherstone & R.Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace / cyberbodies / cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 7995). London : Sage.
  • Poster, M. (1997). Cyberdemocracy: The Internet and the public sphere. In D.Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace (pp. 212228). London : Sage.
  • Potter, J. (1996) Representations of reality. London : Sage.
  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London : Sage.
  • Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A.Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed., pp. 164201). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • Roulstone, A. (1998). Researching a disabling society: The case of employment and new technology. In T.Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social sciences perspectives (pp. 110128). Great Britain : Cassell.
  • Serpentelli, J. (1993). Conversational structure and personality correlates of electronic communication. Unpublished paper, Haverford College. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.game.org/pub/mud/text/research/conversation.txt.
  • Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 91107.
  • Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the net: Women, power and cyberspace. Melbourne , Victoria : Spinifex Press.
  • Suler, J. (1999). Do boys just wanna have fun?: Male gender switching in cyberspace (and how to detect it) (2.5 ed.). [On-line]. Retrieved from http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/genderswap.html.
  • Tuffin, K. & Howard, C. (2001). Demystifying discourse analysis: Theory, method and practice. In A.McHoul & M.Rapley (Eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods (pp. 196205). London : Continuum International.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York : Simon & Schuster.
  • Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1990). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs: Journal of women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 128157.
  • Turner, S. (1994) Relativism hot and cold. History of the Human Sciences, 7, 109115.
  • Van Gelder, L. (1991). The strange case of the electronic lover. In C.Dunlop & R.Kling (Eds.), Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (2nd ed., pp. 364375). Boston : Academic Press.
  • Vasseleu, C. (1997). Virtual bodies / virtual worlds. In D.Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace (pp. 4658). London : Sage.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 343.
  • Wetherell, M. (1995). Romantic discourse and feminist analysis: Interrogating investment, power and desire. In S.Wilkinson & C.Kitzinger (Eds.), Feminism and discourse: Psychological perspectives (pp. 128144). London : Sage.
  • Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1988). Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretive repertoires. In C.Antaki (Ed.), analyzing everyday explanation (pp. 168183). London : Sage.
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford : Blackwell.