SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Abramson, J. B., Arterton, F. C., & Orren, G. R. (1988). The electronic commonwealth: The impact of new media technologies on democratic politics. New York : Basic Books, Inc.
  • Adamic, L. A., & Adar, E. (2001, May 15). You are what you link. Paper presented at the The 10th International World Wide Web Conference.
  • Berners-Lee, T. (2000). Weaving the web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web. New York : HarperCollins.
  • Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political mobilization: Research note on the 1996 election season. Social Science Computer Review, 16(4), 391401.
  • Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Boulder , CO : Westview Press.
  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge , MA : Blackwell.
  • D'Alessio, D. (1997). Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US election. Electoral Studies, 16(4), 489500.
  • December, J. (1996). Units of analysis for internet communication. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1(4). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue4/december.html.
  • Diamond, E., McKay, M., & Silverman, R. (1993). Pop goes politics: New media, interactive formats, and the 1992 campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(2), 257261.
  • Downing, J. (1989). Computers for political change: Peacenet and public data access. Journal of Communication, 39(3), 154162.
  • Dulio, D. A., Goff, D. L., & Thurber, J. A. (1999). Untangled web: Internet use during the 1998 election. PS: Political Science and Politics, 32(1), 5358.
  • Foot, K. A., & Schneider, S. M. (2002). Online action in campaign 2000: An exploratory analysis of the U.S. political Web sphere. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(2), 222244.
  • Garramone, G. M., Harris, A. C., & Anderson, R. (1986). Uses of political computer bulletin boards. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30(3), 325339.
  • Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(1). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/garton.html.
  • Glass, A. J. (1996). On-line elections: The internet's impact on the political process. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1(4), 140146.
  • Goldenberg, E. N., & Traugott, M. W. (1984). Campaigning for Congress. Washington D.C. : Congressional Quarterly Press.
  • Hacker, K. L., Howl, L., Scott, M., & Steiner, R. (1996). Uses of computer-mediated political communication in the 1992 presidential campaign: A content analysis of the Bush, Clinton and Perot computer lists. Communication Research Reports, 13(2), 138146.
  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Howard, P. (2002). Network ethnography and hypermedia organization: New organizations, new media, new myths. New Media & Society, 4(4), 550574.
  • Jackson, M. (1997). Assessing the structure of the communication on the World Wide Web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/jackson.html.
  • Kaid, L. L., & Bystrom, D. G. (1998). The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication. Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kamarck, E. C. (1999). Campaigning on the Internet in the elections of 1998. In Kamarck, E. C., & Nye, J. J. S. (Eds.), Democracy.com?: Governance in the network world (pp. 99123). Hollis , NH : Hollis Publishing.
  • Keep, C., McLaughlin, T., & Parker, R. (1993). The electronic labyrinth.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1966). Candidates for office: Beliefs and strategies. New York : Random House.
  • Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace revolution. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Meadow, R. G. (1986). The electronic machine: New technologies in political campaigns. Election Politics, 3(3), 2631.
  • Mickunas, A., & Pilotta, J. (Eds.). (1998). Technocracy vs. democracy: Issues in the politics of communication. Cresskill , NJ : Hampton Press.
  • Mitra, A. (1999). Characteristics of the WWW text: Tracing discursive strategies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(1). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue1/mitra.html.
  • Myers, D. D. (1993). New technology and the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(2), 181187.
  • Nelson, T. H. (1978). Dream machines: New freedoms through computer screens-a minority report. South Bend , IN : The Distributors.
  • Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. New York : Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Sullivan, P. B. (1995). Computer networks and political participation: Santa Monica's teledemocracy project. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23(2), 93107.
  • Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the seat of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html.
  • Park, H. W. (in press). What is hyperlink network analysis?: New method for the study of social structure on the Web. Connections.
  • Park, H. W., Barnett, G. A., & Nam, I.-Y. (2002). Hyperlink-affiliation network structure of top Web sites: Examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 53(7), 592601.
  • Park, H. W., Kim, C.-S., & Barnett, G. (in press). Socio-communicational structure among political actors on the Web: A network analysis of Korean political parties' and assemblymen's Web sites in 2000–2001. New Media & Society.
  • Puopolo, S. T. (2001). The Web and U.S. senatorial campaigns 2000. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 20302047.
  • Rogers, R., & Marres, N. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science & technology debates on the World Wide Web. Public Understanding of Science, 9(2), 141163.
  • Rogers, R., & Marres, N. (2002). French scandals on the Web, and on the streets: A small experiment in stretching the limits of reported reality. Asian Journal of Social Science, 30(2), 339353.
  • Schneider, S. M. (1996). Creating a democratic public sphere through political discussion: A case study of abortion conversation on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 14(4), 373393.
  • Schneider, S. M., & Foot, K. A. (2002). Online structure for political action: Exploring presidential Web sites from the 2000 American election. Javnost (The Public), 9(2), 4360.
  • Stromer-Galley, J., Foot, K. A., Schneider, S. M., & Larsen, E. (2001). What citizens want, where they went, and what they got online in the U.S. election 2000. In Coleman, S. (Ed.), Elections in the age of the Internet: Lessons from the United States (pp. 2635). London : Hansard Society.
  • Westlye, M. C. (1991). Senate elections and campaign intensity. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.