SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom and online community. Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Binik, Y. M., Cantor, J., Ochs, E., & Meana, M. (1997). From the couch to the keyboard: Psychotherapy in cyberspace. In S.Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 71102). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bowers, J. W., & Courtright, J. A. (1984). Communication research methods. Glenview , IL : Scott, Foresman.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (1), 3746.
  • Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7 (2), 119135.
  • Dennis, A. R., Pootheri, S. K., & Natarajan, V. L. (1998). Lessons from the early adopters of Web groupware. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14 (4), 6586.
  • Erickson, T. (1997, January). Social interaction on the Net: Virtual community as participatory genre. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii .
  • Fernback, J. (1999). There is a there there: Notes toward a definition of cybercommunity. In S.Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 203220). Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications.
  • Figallo, C. (1998). Hosting Web communities: Building relationships, increasing customer loyalty, and maintaining a competitive edge. New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Filipczak, B. (1998). Trainers on the Net: A community of colleagues. Training, 35 (2), 7076.
  • Furlong, M. S. (1989). An electronic community for older adults: The SeniorNet Network. Journal of Communication, 39 (3), 145153.
  • Gefen, D., & Ridings, C. (2003). IT Acceptance: Managing user - IT group boundaries. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 34 (3), 2540.
  • Google.com. (2003). Google groups - basics of Usenet. Retrieved October 17, 2003 from http://www.google.com/googlegroups/basics.html.
  • Gross, N. (1999, March 22). Building global communities: How business is partnering with sites that draw together like-minded consumers. BusinessWeek Online. Retrieved October 17, 2004 from http://businessweek.com/datedtoc/1999/9912.htm.
  • Hagel, J., & Armstrong, A. G. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.
  • Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73 (3), 4048.
  • Herring, S. C. (1996). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. C.Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 81106). Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
  • Hiltz, S. R. (1984). Online communities: A case study of the office of the future. Norwood , NJ : Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40 (9), 4449.
  • Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group structure and social identity. In W. P.Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 6594). UK : Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121140.
  • Horowitz, D. (1997, April 1). Homeless can connect on own Web site. The San Francisco Examiner, p. A-3.
  • Horrigan, J. B., Rainie, L., & Fox, S. (2001). Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties. Retrieved October 17, 2003 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Report1.pdf.
  • House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading , MA : Addison-Wesley.
  • Igbaria, M. (1999). The driving forces in the virtual society. Communications of the ACM, 42 (12), 6470.
  • Jackson, E. L. (1999). Leisure and the Internet. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 70 (9), 1822.
  • Jones, Q. (1997). Virtual-communities, Virtual settlements & cyber-archaeology: A theoretical outline. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3 (3). Retrieved October 17, 2003 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue3/jones.html.
  • Jones, S. G. (1995). Understanding community in the information age. In S. G.Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 1035). London : Sage Publications.
  • Kenny, D., & Marshall, J. F. (2000). Contextual marketing: The real business of the Internet. Harvard Business Review, 78 (6), 119125.
  • Kilsheimer, J. (1997, April 7). Virtual communities; Cyberpals keep in touch online. The Arizona Republic, p. E3.
  • Korenman, J., & Wyatt, N. (1996). Group dynamics in an e-mail forum. In S. C.Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 225242). Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 22, 7994.
  • Lee, F. S. L., Vogel, D., & Limayem, M. (2003). Virtual community informatics: A review and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 5 (1), 4761.
  • Liu, G. Z. (1999). Virtual community presence in Internet relay chatting. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5 (1). Retrieved October 17, 2003 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/liu.html.
  • Lowes, R. L. (1997). Here come patients who've “studied” medicine on-line. Medical Economics, 74 (2), 175187.
  • Maignan, I., & Lukas, B. A. (1997). The nature and social uses of the Internet: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 31 (2), 346371.
  • Matei, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2001). Real and virtual social ties. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3), 550564.
  • Mickelson, K. D. (1997). Seeking social support: Parents in electronic support groups. In S.Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 157178). Mahawah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage Publications.
  • Morochove, R. (2003, August 4). It's not flashy, but Usenet still vital to Net. The Toronto Star, p. D02.
  • Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2000, April). Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. Paper presented at the CHI 2000, Amsterdam .
  • Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1995). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1 (4). Retrieved October 17, 2003 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue4/parks.html.
  • Perreault, W. D. J., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 135148.
  • Petersen, A. (1999, January 6). Some places to go when you want to feel right at home: Communities focus on people who need people. The Wall Street Journal, p. B6.
  • Preece, J., & Ghozati, K. (1998, August). In search of empathy online: A review of 100 online communities. Paper presented at the Association for Information Systems 1998 Americas Conference, Baltimore , MD .
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York : Simon & Schuster.
  • Reid, E. (1999). Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 107133). New York : Routledge.
  • Rheingold, H. (1993a). A slice of life in my virtual community. In L. M.Harasim (Ed.), Global networks: Computers and international communication (pp. 5780). Cambridge , MA : The MIT Press.
  • Rheingold, H. (1993b). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading , MA : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Ridings, C., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11 (3–4), 271295.
  • Rosson, M. B. (1999). I get by with a little help from my cyber-friends: Sharing stories of good and bad times on the Web. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4 (4). Retrieved October 17, 2003 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/rosson.html.
  • Saranow, J., & Hayward, S. (2003, August 19). Surfing the Internet for new chums. The Wall Street Journal, p. D4.
  • Smith, A. D. (1999). Problems of conflict management in virtual communities. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 134163). New York : Routledge.
  • Smith, M. A. (1999). Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Mapping the social structure of the Usenet. In M. A.Smith (Ed.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 195219). New York : Routledge.
  • Sproull, L., & Faraj, S. (1997). Atheism, sex and databases: The Net as a ssocial technology. In S.Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 3551). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Sreenivasan, S. (1997, March 17). New neighborhood, no money down. The New York Times, Section D, p. 5.
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 6176). UK : Academic Press.
  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Thoits, P. A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 145159.
  • Turner, J. C. (1978). Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favouritism. In H.Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 233250). UK : Academic Press.
  • Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. L.Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77122). UK : JAI Press Inc.
  • Umesh, U. N., Peterson, R. A., & Sauber, M. H. (1989). Interjudge agreement and the maximum value of kappa. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49.
  • Underwood, R., Bond, E., & Baer, R. (2001). Building service brands via social identity: Lessons from the sports marketplace. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9 (1), 113.
  • Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1 (1). Retrieved October 16, 2003 from http://www.behavior.net/job/v1n1/utz.html.
  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). ”It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9 (2-3), 155173.
  • Watson, G., & Johnson, D. (1972). Social psychology: Issues and insights. Philadelphia : J. B. Lippincott.
  • Wellman, B. (1996, April). For a social network analysis of computer networks: A sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community. Paper presented at the SIGCPR/SIGMIS, Denver , CO .
  • Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic Group is virtually a social network (g. f. D. library, Trans.). In S.Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179205). Mahawah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999a). The network basis of social support: A network is more than the sum of its ties. In B.Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities (pp. 83118). Boulder , CO : Westview Press.
  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999b). Virtual communities as communities. In M. A.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167194). New York : Routledge.
  • Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213238.
  • Wingfield, N., & Hanrahan, T. (1999, April 8). Web firm salon buys ‘the Well,’ an online pioneer. The Wall Street Journal, p. B9.
  • Witmer, D. F., & Katzman, S. L. (1998). Smile when you say that: Graphic accents As gender markers in computer-mediated communication. In F.Sudweeks, M.McLaughlin & S.Rafaeli (Eds.), Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet (pp. 311). Cambridge , MA : AAAI Press/The MIT Press.