SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Argyle, M. (1975). The syntaxes of bodily communication. In J.Benthal & T.Polhemus (Eds.), The body as a medium of expression (pp. 143161). New York , NY : E.P. Dutton & Co., Inc.
  • Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication (2nd ed.). New York : International Universities Press, Inc.
  • Asch, S. (1958). The metaphor: A psychological inquiry. In R.Tagiuri & L.Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 8694). Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press.
  • Becker, B., & Mark, G. (2002). Social conventions in computer-mediated communication: A comparison of three online shared virtual environments. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 1939). London : Springer-Verlag.
  • Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., & Pycock, J. (2001). To what extent is cyberspace really a space Collaborative Virtual Environments. Communications of the ACM, 4(7), 79-85. Retrieved January 20, 2004 from http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=379300.379322.
  • Berger, C., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99112.
  • Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg's dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2), Retrieved January 20, 2004 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue2/biocca2.html.
  • Biocca, F., & Nowak, K. (2002). Plugging your body into the telecommunication system: Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments. In D.Atkin & C.Lin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 407447). Cresskill , NJ : Hampton Press.
  • Blascovich, J. (2002). Social Influence within immersive virtual environments. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars; Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 127145). London : Springer-Verlag.
  • Bolter, J. D. (1984). Turing's man: Western culture in the computer age. Chapel Hill : The University of North Carolina Press.
  • Brent, E., & Thompson, G. A. (1999). Sociology: Modeling social interaction with autonomous agents. Social Science Computer Review, 17(3), 313322.
  • Bull, P. (1983). Body movement and interpersonal communication. Chichester , New York : John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Bull, P., & Rumsey, N. (1988). The social psychology of facial appearance. Springer-Verlag.
  • Burgoon, J. (1994). Nonverbal signals. In M. L.Knapp & G. R.Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 229285). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage Publications.
  • Burgoon, J., Buller, D., & Woodall, W. (1996). Nonverbal communication; The unspoken dialogue (2nd ed.). New York : McGraw-Hill.
  • Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1995). Developmental differences between distributed and face-to-face groups in electronically supported meeting environments: An exploratory investigation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, 213233.
  • Cassell, J., & Vilhjalmsson, H. (1999). Fully embodied conversational avatars: Making communication behaviors autonomous. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2(1), Retrieved November 5, 2002 from http://gn.www.media.mit.edu/groups/gn/publications/agent_journal2098.pdf.
  • Chesebro, J., & Bonsall, D. (1989). Computer-mediated communication; Human relationships in a computerized world. Tuscaloosa : The University of Alabama Press.
  • Clark, N. (1995). Rear-view mirrorshades: The recursive generation of the cyberbody, In M.Featherstone & R.Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace/cyberbodies/cyberpunk; Cultures of technological embodiment (pp. 113133). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage Publications.
  • Clatterbuck, G. (1979). Attributional confidence and uncertainty. Human Communication Research, 5(2), 147157.
  • Cronkhite, G., & Liska, J. (1976). A critique of factor analytic approaches to the study of credibility. Communication Monographs, 43(2), 91108.
  • Damer, B. (1997). Avatars: Exploring and building virtual worlds on the Internet. Berkley , CA : Peachpit Press.
  • Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285290.
  • Donath, J., Karahalios, K., & Viegas, F. (1999). Visualizing conversation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved January 20, 2004 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue4/donath.html.
  • Donath, J. S. (1999a). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 2959). London and New York : Routledge.
  • Donath, J. S. (1999b). Virtual communities as communities. In M.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167194). London and New York : Routledge.
  • Dryer, D. C. (1999). Getting personal with computers: How to design personalities for agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(2), 273295.
  • Fiske, S., & Neuberg, S. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 174). Ontario , Canada : Academic Press, Inc.
  • Gibson, W. (1986). Neuromancer. New York , New York : The Berkley Publishing Group.
  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York : The Free Press.
  • Goodwin, J. (1998). The meaning of life; Real and/or artificial. In T.Kunii & A.Luciani (Eds.), Cyberworlds (pp. 4365). Tokyo : Springer-Verlag.
  • Guye-Vuilleme, A., Capin, T., Pandzic, I., Magnenat-Thalmann, N., & Thalmann, D. (1999). Nonverbal communication interface for collaborative virtual environments. The Virtual Reality Journal, 4, 4959.
  • Hampshier, S. (1991). Biology, machines, and humanity. In J.Sheehan & M.Sosna (Eds.), The boundaries of humanity: Humans, animals, machines (pp. 253256). Oxford , England : University of California Press.
  • Heider, F. (1958). Perceiving the other person. In R.Tagiuri & L.Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 2226). Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press.
  • Hert, P. (1997). Social dynamics of an on-line scholarly debate. The Information Society, 13, 329360.
  • Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., & Benford, S. (2001). Virtually missing the point: Configuring CVEs for object-focused interaction. In E. F.Churchill, D. N.Snowdon & A. J.Munro (Eds.), Collaborative virtual environments: Digital places and spaces for interaction (pp. 115142). London Berlin Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag.
  • Hinton, P. R. (1993). The psychology of interpersonal perception. New York : Routeledge.
  • Horwitz, M. (1958). The veridicality of liking and disliking. In R.Tagiuri & L.Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. 191209). Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press.
  • Ichheiser, G. (1970). Appearances and realities; Misunderstanding in human relations. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, Inc. Publishers.
  • Infante, D., Rancer, A., & Womack, D. (1997). Building communication theory (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights , Illinois : Waveland Press, Inc.
  • Isla, D., & Blumberg, B. (2002, March). New challenges for character-based AI for games. Paper presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium on AI and Interactive Entertainment, Palo Alto , CA .
  • Koda, T. (1996). Agents with faces: A study on the effects of personification of software agents. Unpublished MS Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1999). Communities in cyberspace. In M.Smith & P.Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 325). London and New York : Routledge.
  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things; What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago and London : The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lanier, J. (1992). Virtual reality: the promise of the future. Interactive Learning International, 8, 275279.
  • Laurel, B. (1990). Interface agents: Metaphors with character. In B.Laurel (Ed.), The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 235366). Reading , MA : Addison-Wesley.
  • Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2(3&4), 321341.
  • Lipton, M. (1996). Forgetting the body: Cybersex and identity. In L.Strate & R.Jacobson & S.Gibson (Eds.), Communication and cyberspace: Social interaction in an electronic environment. Cresskill , New Jersey : Hampton Press, Inc.
  • Magnenat-Thalmann, N., & Kshirsagar, S. (2000, October). Communicating with autonomous virtual humans. Paper presented at the TWENTE Workshop on Language Technology, Enschede Universiteit.
  • McCroskey, J. (1971). Ethos, credibility, and communication in the real world. North Carolina Journal of Speech, 4, 2431.
  • McCroskey, J., Hamilton, P., & Weiner, A. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1(1), 4252.
  • McCroskey, J., & McCain, T. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261266.
  • Nass, C., Lombard, M., Henriksen, L., & Steuer, J. (1995). Anthropocentrism and computers. Behavior and Information Technology, 14(4), 229238.
  • Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81.
  • Oravec, J. (1996). Virtual Individuals, virtual groups: Human dimensions of groupware and computer networking. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • O'Sullivan, P. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 403431.
  • Palmer, M. (1995). Interpersonal communication and virtual reality: Mediating interpersonal relationships. In F.Biocca & M.Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 277299). Hillsdale , New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Parks, M., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 8097.
  • Patterson, M. (1995). Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19(1), 329.
  • Paulos, E., & Canny, J. (1997). Ubiquitous tele-embodiment: Applications and implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46, 861877.
  • Ramerez, A., Walther, J. B., Burgoon, J. K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer mediated communication: Toward a conceputal model. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 213228.
  • Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications.
  • Rice, R., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion; Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication Research, 14(1), 85108.
  • Riva, G., & Galimberti, C. (2001). The mind in the Web: Psychology in the Internet age. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(1), 15.
  • Schiano, D. J. (1999). Lessons from LambdaMOO: A social, text-based virtual environment. Presence: teleoperators and virtual environments, 8(2), 127139.
  • Schmitz, J., & Fulk, F. (1991). Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail; A test of the social influence model of technology use. Communication Research, 18(4), 487523.
  • Schroeder, R. (1996). From the laboratory to consumer electronics, possible worlds: The social dynamic of virtual reality technology. Westview Press.
  • Schroeder, R. (2002). Social interaction in virtual environments: Key issues, common themes, and a framework for research. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars; Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. London : Springer-Verlag.
  • Sheehan, J. (1991a). Introduction: humans and animals. In J.Sheehan & M.Sosna (Eds.), The boundaries of humanity: Humans, animals, machines (pp. 2735). Oxford , England : University of California Press.
  • Sheehan, J. (1991b). Introduction: Humans and machines. In J.Sheehan & M.Sosna (Eds.), The boundaries of humanity: Humans, animals, machines (pp. 135141). Oxford , England : University of California Press.
  • Sherman, R., End, C., Kraan, E., Cole, A., Campbell, J., Klausner, J., & Birchmeier, Z. (2001). Metaperception in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(1), 123129.
  • Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuier, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157187.
  • Slater, M., & Steed, A. (2002). Meeting people virtually: experiments in shared virtual environments. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 146171). London : Springer-Verlag.
  • Spender, D. (1996). Nattering on the Net: Women, power and cyberspace. Melbourne , Australia. : Spinifex Press.
  • Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J., & Waters, K. (1996). When the interface is a face. Human Computer Interaction., 11(2), 97124.
  • Stephenson, N. (1993). Snow crash. New York : Bantam Books.
  • Suler, J. (1996). Life at the palace; A cyberpsychology case study. Retrieved October 5, 2001 from http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/palacestudy.html.
  • Tagiuri, R. (1958). Introduction. In R.Tagiuri & L.Petrullo (Eds.), Person perception and interpersonal behavior (pp. ixxvii). Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press.
  • Takeuchi, A., & Naito, T. (1995, May 7-11, 1995). Situated facial displays: Towards social interaction. Paper presented at the “Chi '95 Mosaic of Creativity, ACM.”.
  • Talamo, A., & Ligorio, B. (2001). Strategic identities in cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(1), 109122.
  • Taylor, T. L. (1999). Life in virtual worlds; Plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 436449.
  • Taylor, T. L. (2002). Living digitally: Embodiment in virtual worlds. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars; Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 4062). London : Springer-Verlag.
  • Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 314348.
  • Tomlinson, B., Downie, M., & Blumberg, B. (2001). Multiple conceptions of character-based interactive installations. The Synthetic Characters Group, MIT Media Lab. Retrieved March 10, 2003 from http://www.media.mit.edu/characters/additional20resources/CHI_2001_character.pdf.
  • Turkle, S. (1991). Romantic reactions: Paradoxical responses to the computer presence. In J.Sheehan & M.Sosna (Eds.), The boundaries of humanity: Humans, animals, machines (pp. 224252). Oxford , England : University of California Press.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York : Simon & Schuster.
  • Waskul, D., & Douglass, M. (1997). Cyberself: The emergence of self in on-line chat. The Information Society, 13(4), 375397.
  • Wexelblat, A. (1997). Don't make that face: A report on anthropomorphizing an interface. Retrieved November 1, 1999 from http://wex.www.media.mit.edu/people/wex/anthro-expt-paper/Anthro-r.htm.