SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bakardjieva, M., & Feenberg, A. (2002). Community technology and democratic rationalization. The Information Society, 18, 181192.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1988). Simulacra and simulations. In. M.Poster (Ed.), Jean Baudrillard: Selected writings (pp. 166184). Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press.
  • Baym, N. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Becker, B., & Mark, G. (2002). Social conventions in computer-mediated communication. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 1939). London : Springer.
  • Bromberg, H. (1996). Are MUDs communities? Identity, belonging, and consciousness in virtual worlds. In R.Shields (Ed.), Cultures of the Internet: Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies (pp. 143152). London : Sage Publications.
  • Burgoon, J. (1983). Nonverbal violations of expectancies. In J.Wiemann, & R.Harrison (Eds.), Nonverbal interaction (pp. 77112). Beverly Hills , CA : Sage Publications.
  • Carbaugh, D. (1990). Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford , UK : Blackwell Publishers.
  • Cherny, L. (1999). Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford : CSLI Publications.
  • Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Danet, B. (2001). Cyberpl@y: Communicating online. Oxford : Berg Publishers.
  • Denzin, N. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park , CA : Sage.
  • Dillenbourg, P., Montandon, L., & Traum, D. (2003). Where is my partner? Spatial coordination in a virtual collaborative environment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Feenberg, A. (1989). A user's guide to the pragmatics of computer mediated communication. Semiotica, 75, 257278.
  • Fernback, J. (1999). There is a there there: Notes toward a definition of cybercommunity. In S.Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 203220). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage Publications.
  • Giese, M. (1998). Constructing a virtual geography: Narrative of space in a text-based environment. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 22, 152176.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City , NY : Doubleday.
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York : Harper and Row.
  • Hall, E. (1959). The silent language. Garden City , NY : Doubleday and Company.
  • Hickson, M., & Stacks, D. (1993). Nonverbal communication: Studies and applications. Madison , WI : Brown & Benchmark.
  • Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 828.
  • Hymes, D. (1972). Models of interaction of language and social life. In J.Gumperz, & D.Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 3571). New York : Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia , PA : University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Jones, S. (1998a). Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage Publications.
  • Jones, S. (1998b). Media use in an electronic community. In F.Sudweeks, M.McLaughlin, & S.Rafaeli (Eds.), Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet (pp. 7794). Menlo Park , CA : MIT Press.
  • Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging out in the virtual pub: Masculinities and relationships online. Berkeley , CA : University of California Press.
  • Kolko, B., & Reid, E. (1998). Dissolution and fragmentation: Problems in online communities. In S.Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 212229). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage Publications.
  • Krikorian, D., Lee, J., Chock, T., & Harms, C. (2000). Isn't that spatial? Distance and communication in a 2-D virtual environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(4). Retrieved June 10, 2001 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue4/krikorian.html.
  • Levy, P. (1998). Becoming virtual: Reality in the digital age. New York : Plenum Publishing.
  • Markham, A. (1998). Life online: Researching real experience in virtual space. Walnut Creek , CA : AltaMira Press.
  • Marvin, L. (1995). Spoof, spam, lurk, and lag: the aesthetic of text-based virtual realities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(2). Retrieved June 3, 1999 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol1/issue2/index.html.
  • Mejas, U. (2001). Sustainable communicational realities in the age of virtuality. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18, 211228.
  • Mendelson, E. (1997). Grand designs. PC Magazine, 16, 100102.
  • Morningstar, C., Farmer, F. (1991). The lessons of Lucasfilm's habitat. In M.Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (273302). Cambridge , MA : The MIT Press.
  • Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. New York : The Free Press.
  • Paccagnella, L. (1997). Getting the seats of your pants dirty: Strategies for ethnographic research in virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). Retrieved June 3, 1999 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html.
  • Parks, M., & Roberts, L. (1998). Making MOOsic: The development of personal relationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517537.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689715.
  • Saville-Troike, M. (1989). The ethnography of communication: An introduction. Oxford , UK : B. Blackwell.
  • Schaap, F. (2002). The words that took us there: Ethnography in a virtual reality. Amsterdam : Aksant Academic Publishers.
  • Schroeder, R. (2002). Social interaction in virtual environments: Key issues, common themes, and a framework for research. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 118). London : Springer.
  • Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change. New York : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Soukup, C. (1999). The gendered interactional patterns of computer-mediated chatrooms: A critical ethnographic study. The Information Society: An International Journal, 15, 169176.
  • Soukup, C. (2000). Building a theory of multimedia CMC: An analysis, critique, and integration of computer-mediated communication theory and research. New Media & Society, 2, 407425.
  • Sproull, L., & Faraj, S. (1995). Atheism, sex, and databases: The net as a social technology. In B.Kahin, & J.Keller (Eds.), Public access to the Internet (pp. 6284). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Stone, A. (1995). Sex and death among the disembodied: VR, cyberspace, and the nature of academic discourse. In S.Star (Ed.), The cultures of computing (pp. 243255). Cambridge , MA : Blackwell Publishers.
  • Suler, J. (1996). Life at the Palace. Retrieved 1 July 2004 from http://www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/palacestudy.html.
  • Taylor, T.L. (2002). Living digitally: Embodiment in virtual worlds. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 4062). London : Springer.
  • Turkle, S. (1997). Multiple subjectivity and virtual community at the end of the Freudian century. Sociological Inquiry, 67, 7284.
  • Waller, M. (1997). If reality is the best metaphor, it must be virtual. Diacritics, 27, 90104.
  • Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 343.
  • Watson, N. (1997). Why we argue about virtual community: A case study of the phish.net fan community. In S.Jones, (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cyberspace (pp. 102132). London : Sage.
  • Wynn, E., & Katz, J. (1996). Hyperbole over cyberspace: self-presentation and social boundaries in internet home pages and discourse. The Information Society: An International Journal, 13, 297328.