SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom versus physical classroom: An exploratory study ofclass discussion patterns and student learning in an asynchronous Internet-based MBA course. Journal of Management Education, 24 (2), 213233.
  • Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 User's Guide. Chicago : SPSS, Inc.
  • Becker, B., & Mark, G. (2002). Social conventions in computer-mediated communication: A comparison of three online shared virtual environments. In R.Schroeder (Ed.), The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments (pp. 1939). London : Springer-Verlag.
  • Berger, C., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1 (2), 99112.
  • Biocca, F., & Nowak, K. (2002). Plugging your body into the telecommunication system: Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments. In D.Atkin & C.Lin (Eds.), Communication Technology and Society: Audience Adoption and Uses (pp. 407447). Cresskill , NJ : Hampton Press.
  • Burgoon, J., & Hale, J. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 54 (1), 1941.
  • Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1987). Appropriateness and effectiveness perceptions of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research, 14, 93118.
  • Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B.Reskick, J. M.Levine, & S. D.Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 127149). Washington , DC : American Psychological Association.
  • Clatterbuck, G. (1979). Attributional confidence and uncertainty. Human Communication Research, 5 (2), 147157.
  • Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training: Trade-offs in judgmental tasks. Communication Research, 30 (2), 147177.
  • Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191233.
  • Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11 (3), 355368.
  • Danowski, J. A., & Rice, R. E. (1989, May). Correspondence Between Users' Semantic Networks and Computer-Monitored Data on Uses of Voice Mail for Messaging Versus Answering. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, San Francisco .
  • Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2003). A “mix of attributes” approach to the study of media effects and new communication technologies. Journal of Communication, 53 (3), 395410.
  • Gale, S. (1991). Adding audio and video to an office environment. In J. M.Bowers & S. D.Benford (Eds.), Studies in Computer-Supported Collaborative Work (pp. 4962). North-Holland : Elsevier Science Publishers.
  • Goodyear, P. (1996). Asynchronous peer interaction in distance education: The evolution of goals, practices and technology. Training Research Journal, 1, 71102.
  • Hancock, J. T. (2005). Like I Care: Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication on Face and the Production of Sarcastic Irony. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28 (3), 325347.
  • Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4 (4). Retrieved April 17, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html.
  • Hesse, B. W., Werner, C. M., & Altman, I. (1988). Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 4 (2), 147165.
  • Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. In P.Bauersfeld, J.Bennett, & G.Lynch (Eds.), CHI '92 Conference Proceedings: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 119125). New York , NY : Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Honeycutt, L. (2001). Comparing email and synchronous conferencing in online peer response. Written Communication, 18 (1), 2660.
  • Hopper, A. (1994, July). Communications at the desktop. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 26 (10), 12531265.
  • Infante, D., Rancer, A., & Womack, D. (1997). Building Communication Theory (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights , IL : Waveland Press, Inc.
  • Johansen, R., & O'Hara-Devereaux, M. (1994). Globalwork: Bridging Distance, Culture, & Time. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (10), 1123 1134.
  • Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 18 (1), 1349.
  • Madden, M. (2004). America's Online Pursuits: The Changing Picture of Who's Online and What They Do. Pew Internet and American Life Project Report. Retrieved June 11, 2004 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Online_Pursuits_Final.PDF.
  • McCroskey, J. (1971). Ethos, credibility, and communication in the real world. North Carolina Journal of Speech, 4 (1), 2431.
  • McCroskey, J., Hamilton, P., & Weiner, A. (1974). The effect of interaction behavior on source credibility, homophily, and interpersonal attraction. Human Communication Research, 1 (1), 4252.
  • McCroskey, J., & McCain, T. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41 (3), 261266.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J.Galegher, R. E.Kraut, & C.Egido (Eds.), Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technical Foundations of Cooperative Work (pp. 2361). Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum.
  • Olson, J. S., Teasley, S. D., Covi, L., & Olson, G. (2002). The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work. In P.Hinds & S.Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 113135). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • O'Sullivan, P. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26 (3), 403431.
  • Parks, M., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46 (1), 8097.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26 (3), 341371.
  • Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19 (4), 451484.
  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunication. London : John Wiley.
  • Storck, J. & Sproull, L. (1995). Through a glass darkly: What do people learn in videoconferences Human Communication Research, 22 (2), 197219.
  • Trevino, L. K., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic and voice mail evaluation and impacts. Communication Research, 19 (5), 539573.
  • Turoff, M. (1991). Computer-mediated communication requirements for group support. Journal of Organizational Computing, 1 (1), 85113.
  • Van Den Berg, S., & Watt, J. H. (1991). Effects of educational setting on student responses to structured hypertext. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 18 (4), 118124.
  • Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20 (4), 473501.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23 (1), 343.
  • Walther, J. B. (2003, November). Digital Media for Visual Cues in Computer-Mediated Communication: Preferences, Impacts, and Contexts. Paper presented at the Conference on Digital Media and Communication, Philadelphia , PA .
  • Walther, J. B. (in press). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Sometimes less is more. In A.Kappas (Ed.), Face-to-Face Communication Over the Internet: Issues, Research, Challenges. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Walther, J. B., Boos, M., & Jonas, K. J. (2002). Misattribution and attributional redirection in distributed virtual groups. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 269.
  • Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L.Knapp & J. A.Daly (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (3rd ed., pp. 529563). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C. L., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long-term and short-term computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 28 (1), 105134.
  • Warkentin, M., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a Web-based conference system. Decision Sciences, 28 (4), 975996.
  • Watt, J. H., Walther, J. B., & Nowak, K. L. (2002). Asynchronous videoconferencing: A hybrid communication prototype. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Weisband, S. (2002). Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. In P.Hinds, & S.Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 311333). Cambridge , MA : MIT Press.
  • Whittaker, S., Nardi, B., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp . 7988). New York , NY : ACM Press.
  • Whittaker, S. (2003). Things to talk about when talking about things. Human-Computer Interaction, 18 (1), 149170.