SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, K. J. (2001). Internet use among college students: An exploratory study. Journal of American College Health, 50 (1), 2126.
  • Bakken, J. P., & Aloia, G. F. (1998). Evaluating the World Wide Web. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30 (5), 3034.
  • Balas, J. L. (1999). The 'don'ts' of web page design. Computers in Libraries, 19 (8), 4648.
  • Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81 (3), 868876.
  • Blumenstyk, G. (2001). Publishers promote e-textbooks, but many students and professors are skeptical. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47 (36), A35-A36.
  • Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using e-mail for personal relationships: The difference gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3), 530549.
  • Brenner, V. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of Internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the Internet Usage Survey. Psychological Reports, 80 (3), 879882.
  • Burton, V. T., & Chadwick, S. A. (2000). Investigating the practices of student researchers: Patterns of use and criteria for use of Internet and library sources. Computers and Composition, 17 (3), 309328.
  • Creative Pro. (2003). How to's. Retrieved June 24, 2003 from http://www.creativepro.com/front/home.
  • D'Angelo, J., & Little, S. K. (1998). Successful web pages: What are they and do they exist Information Technology and Libraries, 17 (2), 7181.
  • D'Esposito, J. E., & Gardner, R. M. (1999). University students' perceptions of the Internet: An exploratory study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25 (6), 456461.
  • Dalal, N. P., Quible, Z., & Wyatt, K. (2000). Cognitive design of home pages: An experimental study of comprehension on the World Wide Web. Information Processing and Management, 36 (4), 607621.
  • Dillon, D. (2001). E-Books: The University of Texas experience, part 1. Library Hi Tech, 19 (2), 113124.
  • E-textbooks may be a new trend in higher education, but not an immediate threat to traditional publishers. (1999). Electronic Education Report, 6 (5), 13.
  • Jennings, S. E., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2001). Computer attitudes as a function of age, gender, math attitude, and developmental status. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25 (4), 367384.
  • Generation 2001: The second study. (2001). A second study of the first college graduating class of the new millennium. Retrieved January 6, 2005 from http://www.nmfn.com/contentassets/pdfs/study2.pdf.
  • Goodson, C. (2001). Web-connected generation. The Futurist, 35 (5), 9.
  • Goodson, P., McCormick, D., & Evans, A. (2001). Searching for sexually explicit materials on the Internet: An exploratory study of college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30 (2), 101118.
  • Hall, A. S., & Parsons, J. (2001). Internet addiction: College student case study using best practices in cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 23 (4), 312327.
  • Hughes, M. M. (1997). World Wide Web site design. Unpublished manuscript, Texas Woman's University.
  • Jackson, L., Ervin, K., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44 (5/6), 363379.
  • Jones, S. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology. Retrieved November 6, 2002 from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/reports.asp?Report=71&Section=ReportLevel1&Field=Level1ID&ID=312.
  • Kaltenbach, M. (2001). Organizing web based discourse. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001 (1), 856861.
  • Kandell, J. J. (1998). Internet addiction on campus: The vulnerability of college students. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 1 (1), 1117.
  • Landoni, M., & Gibb, F. (2000). The role of visual rhetoric in the design and production of electronic books: the visual book. The Electronic Library, 18 (3), 190201.
  • Leung, L. (2001). College student motives for chatting on ICQ. New Media & Society, 3 (4), 483500.
  • Lindroth, L. (1997). How to … use Internet search tools. Teaching Pre K-8, 28 (2), 1415.
  • Lindsay, W., & McLaren, S. (2000). The Internet: An aid to student research or a source of frustration Journal of Educational Media, 25 (2), 115128.
  • Ling, J. & Van Schaik, P. (2002). The effect of text and background color on visual searches of Web pages. Displays, 23 (5), 223230.
  • Lubans, J. (1998). How first year university students use and regard internet resources. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University.
  • Maddux, C. (1998). The WWW: Some simple solutions to common design problems. Educational Technology, 38 (5), 2428.
  • Markel, M. (1998). What students see: Word processing and the perception of visual design. Computers and Composition, 15 (3), 373386.
  • Matthew, K. I., & Varagoor, G. (2001). Student responses to online course materials. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33 (5). Retrieved January 6, 2005 from http://www.iste.org/jrte/33/5/matthew.cfm.
  • McGovern, G. (2000). Managing information in the digital age: How the reader is king. Irish Marketing Review, 13 (2), 5560.
  • Meyers, D. M. (2003). The impact of virtual office hours on in-class participation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago , IL , April 21–25.
  • Mitra, A. (2002). Towards developing questionnaire items to measure effectiveness of computers in teaching. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26 (4), 381394.
  • Mitra, A., & Hazen, M. (1999). Longitudinal assessment of computerization at Wake Forest University. In D.Brown (Ed.), Electronically Enhanced Education (pp. 101106). Winston-Salem , NC : Wake Forest University Press.
  • Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (1997). Gender differences in Internet usage, behaviors and attitudes among undergraduates. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, San Francisco , CA , August 24–29.
  • Newburger, E. C. (1999). Computer use in the United States. October 1997. Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau (pp. 111). Retrieved June 12 from http://www.census.gov.
  • Odell, P. M., Korgen, K. O., Schumacher, P., & Delucchi, M. (2000). Internet use among female and male college students. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3 (5), 855862.
  • Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84 (1), 111121.
  • O'Hanlon, N. (2002). Net knowledge: Performance of new college students on an Internet skills proficiency test. Internet and Higher Education, 5 (1), 5566.
  • Pascoe, C., Applebee, A., & Clayton, P. (1996). Tidal wave or ripple? The impact of Internet on the Academic. Australian Library Review, 13 (2), 147153.
  • Scealy, M., Phillips, J. G., & Stevenson, R. (2002). Shyness and anxiety as predictors of patterns of Internet usage. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5 (6), 501515.
  • Scherer, K. (1997). College life online: Healthy and unhealthy Internet use. Journal of College Student Development, 38 (6), 655664.
  • Shaw, L. H., & Gant, L. M. (2002). Users divided? Exploring the gender gap in Internet use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5 (6), 517527.
  • Smith, B. N., & Necessary, J. R. (1996). Assessing the computer literacy of undergraduate college students. Education, 117 (2), 188193.
  • Sullivan, P. (2001). Practicing safe visual rhetoric on the World Wide Web. Computers and Composition, 18 (2), 103121.
  • Sutcliffe, A. (2002). Assessing the reliability of heuristic evaluation of website attractiveness and usability. Proceedings of the 35th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press. Retrieved January 15, 2005 from http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2002/1435/05/14350137.pdf.
  • Technology Bits & Bytes. (2001, March). Black Issues in Higher Education, 18 (2), 4041.
  • Technology of E-books needs work before students will accept them, study finds. (2002, September). The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49 (3), A33.
  • Thompson, C. (2003). Information illiterate or lazy: How college students use the web for research. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 49 (2), 259268.
  • Turban, E., & Gehrke, D. (2000). Success determinants of e-commerce Web site design. Human Systems Management, 19 (2), 111120.
  • Useit. (2003). Usable information technology. Retrieved June 24, 2003 from http://www.useit.com.
  • U.S. women surging online, closing gender gap, reshaping social landscape, study says. (2000, Spring). Media Report to Women, 28 (2), 12.
  • Van Der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information & Management, 40 (6), 541549.
  • Van Horn, R. (2001). Website design sites. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (1), 810.
  • Van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2001). The effects of frame layout and differential background contrast on visual search performance in Web pages. Interacting with Computers, 13 (5), 513525.
  • Welsh, L. (1999). Internet use: An exploration of coping style, locus of control, and expectancies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University.
  • Wilson, T. (2000). Web's gender shift more than a curiosity. Internet Week, 827, 28.
  • Young, J. R. (2001). A university that reverses tradition experiments with E-books. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47 (36), A39-A40.
  • Zhang, Y. X. (2002). Comparison of Internet attitudes between industrial employees and college students. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5 (2), 143149.