SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahuja, M. K., & Carley, K. M. (1998). Network structure in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3 (4). Retrieved April 18, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/ahuja.html.
  • Andrews, D., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (2003). Electronic survey methodology: A case study in reaching hard-to-involve Internet users. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16 (2), 185210.
  • Bachmann, D., & Elfrink, J. (1996). Tracking the progress of e-mail versus snail-mail. MarketingResearch, 8 (2), 3135.
  • Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11 (2), 123151.
  • Couper, M. P. (2000). Web-based surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64 (4), 464494.
  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
  • Flaherty, L. M., Pearce, K. J., & Rubin, R. R. (1998). Internet and face-to-face communication: Not functional alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 46 (3), 250268.
  • Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. (2001). Internet use in contemporary media environment. Human Communication Research, 27 (1), 153181.
  • Fox, S., Rainie, L., Larsen, E., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., & Carter, C. (2001). Wired Seniors. The Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved May 4th 2005 from: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Wired_Seniors_Report.pdf.
  • Furlong, M. S. (1989). An electronic community for older adults: The SeniorNet network. Journal of Communication, 39 (3), 145153.
  • Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (1999). Studying on-line social networks. In S.Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net (pp. 75105). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Hamilton, J. C. (1999). The ethics of conducting social science research on the Internet. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46 (15), B67.
  • Hobman, E. V., Bordia, P., Irmer, B., & Chang, A. (2002). The expression of conflict in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 33 (4), 439465.
  • Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24 (3), 307333.
  • Horrigan, J. B. (2001). Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved October 1, 2004 from http://www.pewInternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=47.
  • Howard, P., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3), 383404.
  • Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. (2004). “Go away:”? Participant objections to being studied and the ethics of chatroom research. The Information Society, 20 (2), 127139.
  • Konstan, J. A., Rosser, B. R. S., Ross, M. W., Stanton, J., & Edwards, W. M. (2005). The story of subject naught: A cautionary but optimistic tale of Internet survey research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (2), article 11. Retrieved April 25, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/konstan.html.
  • Lee, J. Y. (1996). Charting the codes of cyberspace: A rhetoric of electronic mail. In L.Strate, R.Jacobson, & S. B.Gibson (Eds.), Communication and Cyberspace: Social Interaction in an Electronic Environment (pp. 275296). Cresskill , NJ : Hampton Press.
  • Llieva, J., Baron, S., & Healey, N. M. (2002). Online surveys in marketing research: Pros and cons. International Journal of Market Research, 44 (3), 361367.
  • Matheson, K. (1991). Social cues in computer-mediated negotiation: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7 (3), 137145.
  • Mehta, R., & Suvadas, E. (1995). Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 37 (4), 429439.
  • Mutahseb, A. (2004). The Internet as an Alternative Source of Information and Alternative Forum of Expression for Arab Americans. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Memphis.
  • Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. Palo Alto , CA : Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society Press.
  • Nie, N., Hillygus, S. & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations and sociability: Findings from a detailed time diary study. In B.Wellman (Ed.), The Internet in Everyday Life (pp. 215243). London : Blackwell Publishers.
  • Nonnecke, B., Preece, J., Andrews, D., & Voutour, R. (2004, August). Online Lurkers Tell Why. Paper presented at the 2004 Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York City , NY .
  • Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46 (1), 8097.
  • Preece, J. (1999). Empathetic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12 (1), 6377.
  • Preece, J. J., & Ghozati, K. (2001). Experiencing empathy on-line. In R. E.Rice & J. E.Katz (Eds.), The Internet and Health Communication: Experiences and Expectations (pp. 237260). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004). The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20 (2), 201223.
  • Query, J. L., Jr., & Wright, K. B. (2003). Assessing communication competence in an on-line study: Toward informing subsequent interventions among older adults with cancer, their lay caregivers, and peers. Health Communication, 15 (2), 205219.
  • Reid, E. (1996). Informed consent in the study of on-line communities: A reflection on the effects of computer mediated research. The Information Society, 12, 169174.
  • Rice, R. E., & Katz, J. E. (2001). The Internet and Health Communication: Experiences and Expectations. Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Schmidt, W. C. (1997). World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 29 (2), 274279.
  • Stanton, J. M. (1998). An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Personnel Psychology, 51 (3), 709725.
  • Taylor, H. (2000). Does Internet research work? Comparing electronic survey results with telephone survey. International Journal of Market Research, 42 (1), 5163.
  • Thompson, L. F., Surface, E. A., Martin, D. L., & Sanders, M. G. (2003). From paper to pixels: Moving personnel surveys to the Web. Personnel Psychology, 56 (1), 197227.
  • Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28 (3), 317348.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23 (1), 343.
  • Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A.Lin & D.Atkin (Eds.), Communication Technology and Society: Audience Adoption and Uses (pp. 153188). Cresskill , NJ : Hampton Press.
  • Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19 (1), 5088.
  • Watt, J. H. (1999). Internet systems for evaluation research. In G.Gay & T. L.Bennington (Eds.), Information Technologies in Evaluation: Social, Moral, Epistemological, and Practical Implications (pp. 2344). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
  • Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S.Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179205). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.) (2002). The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford , UK : Blackwell.
  • Whittaker, S., & Sidner, C. (1997). Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. In S.Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 277295). Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Witmer, D. F., Colman, R. W., & Katzman, S. L. (1999). From paper-and-pencil to screen-and-keyboard: Toward a methodology for survey research on the Internet. In S.Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net (pp. 145161). Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage.
  • Wood, A. F., & Smith, M. J. (2001). On-line Communication: Linking Technology, Identity, and Culture. Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wright, K. B. (1999). Computer-mediated support groups: An examination of relationships among social support, perceived stress, and coping strategies. Communication Quarterly, 47 (4), 402414.
  • Wright, K. B. (2000a). Computer-mediated social support, older adults, and coping. Journal of Communication, 50 (3), 100118.
  • Wright, K. B. (2000b). Perceptions of on-line support providers: An examination of perceived homophily, source credibility, communication and social support within on-line support groups. Communication Quarterly, 48 (1), 4459.
  • Wright, K. B. (2000c). The communication of social support within an on-line community for older adults: A qualitative analysis of the SeniorNet community. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 1 (2), 3343.
  • Wright, K. B. (2000d). Social support satisfaction, on-line communication apprehension, and perceived life stress within computer-mediated support groups. Communication Research Reports, 17 (2), 139147.
  • Wright, K. B. (2002a). Social support within an on-line cancer community: An assessment of emotional support, perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30 (3), 195209.
  • Wright, K. B. (2002b). Motives for communication within on-line support groups and antecedents for interpersonal use. Communication Research Reports, 19 (1), 8998.
  • Wright, K. B. (2004). On-line relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively Internet-based and primarily Internet-based relationships. Communication Studies, 55 (2), 418432.
  • Yun, G. W., & Trumbo, C. W. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, email, and web form. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (1). Retrieved April 18, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/yun.html.