SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abberley, P. (1997). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. In L.Barton & M.Oliver (Eds.), Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future (pp. 160178). Leeds, England: The Disability Press. Retrieved December 17, 2005, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/archframe.htm
  • Abbott, J. (2001). Democracy@internet.asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: Lessons from China and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 99114.
  • Albrecht, G., Seelman, K., & Bury, M. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Altman, B. (2001). Disability definitions, models, classification schemes and applications. In G.Albrecht, K.Seelman, & M.Bury (Eds.), Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 97122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Barnes, C. (1992). Disabled Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People. Halifax: The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People/Ryburn Publishing.
  • Barnes, C. (1993). Political correctness, language and rights. Rights Not Charity [British Council of Organizations of Disabled People’s magazine], Winter, p. 8.
  • Barnes, C. (1997). A legacy of oppression: A history of disability in Western culture. In L.Barton & M.Oliver (Eds.), Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future (pp. 324). Leeds, England: The Disability Press. Retrieved December 17, 2005 from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/archframe.htm
  • Barnes, C. (2003, September). Disability Studies: What’s the Point? Paper presented at Disability Studies: Theory, Policy and Practice Conference, University of Lancaster, England.
  • Barnes, C., & Oliver, M. (1993). Disability: A Sociological Phenomenon Ignored by Sociologists. Retrieved December 27, 2005 from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/archframe.htm
  • Barnes, S. (2001). Online Connections: Internet Interpersonal Relationships. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Blasiotti, E., Westbrook, J., & Kobayashi, I. (2001). Disability studies and electronic networking. In G.Albrecht, K.Seelman, & M.Bury (Eds.), Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 327347). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2003). Dicing with deception: People with disabilities’ strategies for managing safety and identity online. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(2). Retrieved December 27, 2005 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue2/bowker.html
  • British Council of Disabled People. (2002). The Social Model of Disability and Emancipatory Disability Research—Briefing Document. Retrieved December 27, 2005, from http://www.bcodp.org.uk/about/research.shtml
  • Calhoun, C. (Ed.). (1999). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Campbell, J. (1990, February). Developing our image: Who’s in control. Paper presented at the Cap-in-Hand conference. Retrieved January 22, 2006, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/Campbell/DEVELOPING%20OUR%20IMAGE.pdf
  • Clogston, J. (1990). Disability Coverage in 16 Newspapers. Louisville, KY: Advocado Press.
  • Cooke, C., Daone, L., & Morris, G. (2000). Stop Press! How the Press Portrays Disabled People. London: Scope.
  • Costigan, J. (1999). Introduction: Forests, trees and Internet research. In S.Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net (pp. xviixxiv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dewsbury, G., Clarke, K., Randall, D., Rouncefield, M., & Sommerville, I. (2004). The anti-social model of disability. Disability & Society, 19(2), 145158.
  • Disability Rights Commission. (2003). DRC Disability Briefing: February 2003. Retrieved December 28, 2005 from http://www.drc-gb.org/publicationsandreports/campaigndetails.asp?section=oth&id=262
  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Fougeyrollas, P., & Beauregard, L. (2001). Disability: An interactive person-environment social creation. In G.Albrecht, K.Seelman, & M.Bury (Eds.), Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 171194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
  • Gabel S., & Peters, S. (2004). Presage of paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability. Disability & Society, 19(6), 585600.
  • Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P.Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 117). London: Sage.
  • HallS. (Ed.) (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage/Open University.
  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.
  • Huffaker, D., & Calvert, C. (2005). Gender, identity and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10 (2). Retrieved December 28, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html
  • Johnston, M. (1997). Integrating models of disability: A reply to Shakespeare and Watson. In L.Barton & M.Oliver, Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future (pp. 281287). Leeds, England: The Disability Press. Retrieved December 28, 2005, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/archframe.htm
  • Jones, S. (1999). Studying the net: Intricacies and issues. In S.Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net (pp. 127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kopper, G., Kolthoff, A., & Czepek, A. (2000). Research review: Online journalism—a report on current and continuing research and major questions in the international discussion. Journalism Studies, 1 (3), 499512.
  • Liggett, H. (1997). Stars are not born: An interpretive approach to the politics of disability. In L.Barton & M.Oliver (Eds.), Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future (pp. 178194). Leeds, England: The Disability Press. Retrieved December 28, 2005, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/archframe.htm
  • Matheson, D. (2003). Notes from an interview with Ouch staff Simon Vaughan and Damon Rose, London. Unpublished manuscript.
  • McLuhan, M. (1995). The medium is the message. In J.Munns & G.Rajan (Eds.), A Cultural Studies Reader: History, Theory, Practice (pp. 225235). London: Longman.
  • National Statistics Website. Retrieved July 2, 2004, from http://www.statistics.gov.uk
  • Pavlik, J. (2000). The impact of technology on journalism. Journalism Studies, 1(2), 229237.
  • Poster, M. (1995). The Second Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Ross, K. (1997). But where’s me in it? Disability, broadcasting and the audience. Journal of Media Culture and Society, 19(4), 669677.
  • Sancho, J. (2003). Disabling prejudice: Attitudes towards disability and its portrayal on television. BBC Broadcasting Standards Authority and the Independent Television Commission, Britain. Retrieved December 28, 2005, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/policies/diversity.shtml
  • Shakespeare, T. (1996). Disability, identity and difference. In C.Barnes & G.Mercer (Eds.), Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability (pp. 94113). Leeds, England: The Disability Press. Retrieved December 28, 2005, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies/archiveuk/archframe.htm
  • Smith, S., & Jordan, A. (1991). What the Papers Say and Don’t Say About Disability. London: Scope.
  • Sourbati, M. (2004). Internet Use in Sheltered Housing: Older People’s Access to New Media and Online Service Delivery. York, England: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Sweeney, B. (2003). Mainstreaming Disability on Radio 4. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow.
  • Terzi, L. (2004). The social model of disability: A philosophical critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21(2), 141158.
  • Thomas, C. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society, 19(6), 569583.
  • Thoreau, C. E. (2004). Research Project, Nationalism, Ethnicity and Representation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wales, Cardiff.
  • Trend, D. (Ed.) (2001). Reading Digital Culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Turner, B. (2001). Disability and the sociology of the body. In G.Albrecht, K.Seelman, & M.Bury (Eds.), Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 252266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Williams, G. (2001). Theorizing disability. In G.Albrecht, K.Seelman, & M.Bury (Eds.), Handbook of Disability Studies (pp. 123144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Williamson, K., Wright, S., Schauder, D., & Bow, A. (2001). The Internet for the blind and visually impaired. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 7(1). Retrieved December 27, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/williamson.html
  • Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about—a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R.Wodak & M.Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 114). London: Sage.
  • Woodward, K. (Ed.) (1997). Identity and Difference. London: Sage.