SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Althaus, S. (1996). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
  • Archee, R. (1993). Using computer-mediated communication in an educational context: Educational outcomes and pedagogical lessons of computer conferencing. The Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(2). Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://www.cios.org/getfile/ARCHEE_V3N293 [restricted access]
  • Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 15(1), 2230.
  • Berge, Z. L., & Collins, M. (1993). Computer conferencing and online education. The Arachnet Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture, 1(3), Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://www.emoderators.com/papers/bergev1n3.html
  • Bordia, P. (1992). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. The Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 99120.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554571.
  • DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 693703.
  • Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256274.
  • Frick, T. W. (1996, December). Criteria for evaluating use of information technology in K-12 education. Keynote Address to the International Symposium on New Technologies of Instruction, Taipei, Taiwan, December 17. Retrieved January 20, 2006, from http://education.indiana.edu/keyfrick.html
  • Harasim, L. (1990). Online education: An environment for collaboration and intellectual amplification. In L.Harasim (Ed.), Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment (pp. 3964). New York: Praeger.
  • Kearsley, G. (2000). Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/chapts.htm
  • Leasure, A. R., Davis, L., & Thievon, S. L. (2000). Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. World Wide Web-based baccalaureate nursing research course. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(4), 149154.
  • Raskin, J. (2000). The humane interface: New directions for designing interactive systems. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
  • Rice, R. E. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(4), 475500.
  • Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 8797.
  • Sutton, L. A. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223242.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. S. (2000). Principles of pedagogy and evaluation for web-based learning. Educational Media International, 37(2), 105111.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyper-personal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 343.
  • Woolley, D. R. (1998). The future of web conferencing. In P.Robinson (Ed.), Web-based computer conferencing. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://thinkofit.com/webconf/wcfuture.htm