SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Angiolillo, J. S., Blanchard, H. E., Israelski, E. W., & Mané, A. (1997). Technology constraints of video-mediated communication. In K. E.Finn, A. J.Sellen, & S. B.Wilbur (Eds.), Video-Mediated Communication (pp. 5173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. (1995). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In S. E.Jackson & M. N.Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace. (pp.187215). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Barnard, P., May, J., & Salber, D. (1996). Deixis and points of view in media spaces: An empirical gesture. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(1), 3750.
  • Bekker, M. M., Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (1995). Analysis of gestures in face-to-face design teams provides guidance for how to use groupware in design. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques, Ann Arbor, MI (pp. 157166). New York: ACM Press.
  • Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27(1), 1249.
  • Benford, S., Brown, C., Reynard, G., & Greenhalgh, C. (1996). Shared spaces: Transportation, artificiality, and spatiality. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Cambridge, MA (pp.7786). New York: ACM Press.
  • Bowers, C. A., Jentsch, F., Salas, E., & Braun, C. C. (1998). Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Human Factors, 40(4), 672679.
  • Brannick, M. T., Roach, R. M., & Salas, E. (1993). Understanding team performance: A multimethod study. Human Performance, 6(4), 287308.
  • Brannick, M. T., Salas, E., & Prince, C. (Eds.). (1997). Team Performance Assessment and Measurement, Theory, Methods, and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Brehmer, B., & Allard, R. (1991). Dynamic decision making: The effects of task complexity and feedback delay. In J.Rasmussen, B.Brehmer, & J.Leplat. (Eds.), Distributed Decision Making: Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work (pp. 319334). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B.Resnick, J. M.Levine, & S. D.Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. M.Staw & L. L.Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Dickinson, T. L., & McIntyre, R. M. (1997). A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In M. T.Brannick, E.Salas, & C.Prince (Eds.), Team Performance Assessment and Measurement, Theory, Methods, and Applications (pp. 1943). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dickinson, T. L., McIntyre, R. M., Ruggeberg, B. J., Yanushefski, A., Hamil, L. S., & Vick, A. L. (1992). A Conceptual Framework for Developing Team Process Measures of Decision-Making Performance. Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center, Human Factors Division.
  • Fleishman, E. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. In R. W.Swezey & E.Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance (pp. 3156). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. (1998). Design for individuals, design for groups: Tradeoffs between power and workspace awareness. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, WA (pp. 207216). New York: ACM Press.
  • Harris, T. C., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (1997). Components of teamwork: Impact on evaluations of contributions to work team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(19), 16941715.
  • Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2001, May). An Empirical Study of Global Software Development: Distance and Speed. Paper presented at the International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, ON.
  • Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292316.
  • Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. A.Guzzo & E.Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 4678). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Ilgen, D. R., Major, D. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Sego, D. J. (1993). Team research in 1990s. In M. M.Chemers & R.Ayman (Eds.), Leadership Theory and Research: Perspectives and Directions (pp. 245270). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219229.
  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 8598.
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C.Borman, D. R.Ilgen, & R. J.Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (vol. 12, pp. 333375). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • May, A., & Carter, C. (2001). A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27(3), 171186.
  • Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473492.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the group back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L. M.Jessup & J. S.Valacich (Eds.), Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (pp. 7896). New York: Macmillan.
  • McIntyre, R. M., & Salas, E. (1995). Measuring and managing for team performance: Emerging principles from complex environments. In R. A.Guzzo & E.Salas (Eds.), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (pp. 945). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Militello, L. G., Kyne, M. M., Klein, G., Gethchell, K., & Thordsen, M. (1999). A synthesized model of team performance. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3(2), 131158.
  • Mills, A. (1998). Collaborative Engineering and the Internet: Linking Product Development Partners Via the Web. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
  • Olson, J. S., & Teasley, S. (1996). Groupware in the wild: Lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Cambridge, MA (pp. 419427). New York: ACM Press.
  • Paris, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: A review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43(8), 10521075.
  • Rasker, P. C., Post, W. M., & Schraagen, J. M. C. (2000). Effects of two types of intra-team feedback on developing a shared mental model in command & control teams. Ergonomics, 43(8), 11671189.
  • Reid, F. J. M., Reed, S., & Edworthy, J. (1999). Design visualization and collaborative interaction in undergraduate engineering teams. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3(3), 235259.
  • Rosenstein, R. (1994). The Teamwork Components Model: An Analysis Using Structural Equations Modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
  • Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Edens, E. (Eds.). (2001). Improving Teamwork in Organizations: Applications of Human Resource Management Training. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R.Swezey & E.Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their Training and Performance (pp. 329). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: What’s important for team functioning? Military Psychology, 6(3), 177192.
  • Suh, K. S. (1999). Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media-richness theory. Information & Management, 35(5), 295312.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Whittaker, S., Geelhoed, E., & Robinson, E. (1993). Shared workspaces: How do they work and when are they useful? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39(5), 813842.