SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Agre, P. E. (2002). Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process. The Information Society, 18(5), 311331.
  • Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Keeter, S., & Zukin, C. (2002). Searching for the meaning of youth civic engagement: Notes from the field. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 189195.
  • Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. PS: Political Science, 36(2), 275280.
  • Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Goodrich, T., Carteaux, B., & Tuzun, H. (in press). Empowerment design work: Building participant structures that transform. In P.Bell, R.Stevens, & T.Satwicz (Eds.), Keeping learning complex: The proceedings of the fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 132138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Barab, S., MaKinster, J. G., Moore, J., Cunningham, D., & the ILF Design Team. (2001). Designing and building an online community: The struggle to support sociability in the Inquiry Learning Forum. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 7196.
  • Bennet, S. E., Flickinger, R. S., & Rhine, S. L. (2000). Political talk over here, over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 99119.
  • Bers, M. (1998). A constructionist approach to values through on-line narrative tools. International Conference for the Learning Sciences, AACE, 4955.
  • Bers, M. (2001a). Identity construction environments: Developing personal and moral values through the design of a virtual city. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(4), 365415.
  • Bers, M. (2001b). Identity construction environments: The design of computational tools for exploring a sense of self and moral values. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
  • Bers, M. (forthcoming). The role of new technologies to foster positive youth development. Applied Developmental Science Journal.
  • Bers, M., Gonzalez-Heydrich, G., & DeMaso, D. (2001). Identity construction environments: Supporting a virtual therapeutic. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 380387).
  • Bers, M., Gonzalez-Heydrich, J., & DeMaso, D. R. (2003). Use of a computer-based application in a pediatric hemodialysis unit: A pilot study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(4), 493496.
  • Blumler, J. G., & Coleman, S. (2001). Realising democracy online: A civic commons in cyberspace. IPPR/Citizen Online Research. Retrieved on April 24, 2006, from http://www.citizensonline.org.uk/site/media/documents/925_Realising%20Democracy%20Online.pdf
  • Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bruckman, A. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7 (1/2), 4786.
  • Cassell, J. (2002). “We have these rules inside”: The effects of exercising voice in a children’s online forum. In S. L.Calvert & A. B.Jordan (Eds.), Children in the digital age: Influences of electronic media on development (pp. 123144). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
  • Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2005, April). Making learning meaningful: An exploratory study of using multi user virtual environments (MUVES) in middle school science. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Montreal, Canada.
  • Coleman, S., & Gotze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in public deliberation. London: Hansard Society.
  • Conover, P. J., Searing, D. D., & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 2162.
  • Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1). Retrieved October 10, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue1/dahlberg.html
  • Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., & Koller, S. (2001). Brazilian adolescents’ prosocial moral judgment and behavior: Relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics. Child Development, 72(2), 518534.
  • Elder, G. H., Pavalko, E. K., & Clipp, E. C. (1993). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Vol. 88. working with archival data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Faison, N., & Flanagan, C. (2001). Social policy report: Vol. XV. youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for Research in Child Development.
  • Fishkin, J. S. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Grantmaker Forum on Community and National Service. (2000). The state of service-related research: Opportunities to build a field. The Grantmaker Forum on Community and National Service. Berkeley, CA.
  • Guest, A. M., & Wierzbicki, S. K. (1999). Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review, 35(1), 92111.
  • Gutman, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Gutman, A., & Thompson, D. (2000). Why deliberation is different. Social Philosophy and Policy, 17(1), 161180.
  • Herring, S. C. (Ed.). (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Hodson, R. (1999). Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Vol. 128. analyzing documentary accounts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Howard, P., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2002). Days and nights on the Internet: The impact of a diffusing technology. In B.Wellman & C.Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet and everyday life (pp. 4573). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Jones, S. (1998). Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer- mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 11231134.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T.Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior (pp. 3153). New York: Holt, Reinehart & Winston.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1985). The just community approach to moral education in theory and in practice. In M.Berkowitz & F.Oser (Eds.), Moral education: Theory and application (pp. 2287). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crowford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 4974.
  • Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 10171031.
  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Landis, J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159174.
  • Levine, C. (1976). Role taking standpoint and adolescent usage of Kohlberg’s conventional stages of moral reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 4146.
  • London, S. (1997). Civic networks: Building community on the Net. Citizen Participation Centre.
  • Michelsen, E., Zaff, J., & Hair, E. C. (2002). Civic engagement programs and youth development: A synthesis. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
  • Morningstar, C., & Farmer, F. R. (1991). The lessons of lucasfilm’s habitat. In M.Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ng, E., & Detenber, B. (2005). The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 4. Retrieved October 8, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/ng.html
  • Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 426437.
  • Nie, N. H., Hillygus, D. S., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations and sociability: A time diary study. In B.Wellman & C.Haythornwaite (Eds.), Internet and the everyday life (pp. 215243). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Oblak, T. (2003). Boundaries of interactive public engagement: Political institutions and citizens in new political platforms. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3). Retrieved October 8, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/oblak.html
  • Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media and Society, 4(1), 927.
  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorm: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
  • Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.
  • Pinkett, R. D. (2000, April). Bridging the digital divide: Sociocultural constructionism and an asset-based approach to community technology and community building. Paper presented at the 81st annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breathing or building social boundaries? Side-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25(6), 689705.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The crumbling and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Quan-Haase, A., & Wellman, B. (2002). How does the Internet affect social capital? In M.Huysman & V.Wulf (Eds.), IT and social capital (pp. 151176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Reed, D. (1997). Following Kohlberg: Liberalism and the practice of democratic community. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., & Martin, F. (1996). Pianos not stereos: Creating computational construction kits. Interactions, 3(6), 4149.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling. In S.Vosniadou & E.De Corte (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 149163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Selman, R. L. (1976). Social-cognitive understanding. In T.Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic Press.
  • Selman, R. L., Beardslee, W., Schultz, L. H., Krupa, M., & Podorefsky, D. (1986). Assessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 450459.
  • Shaw, A. (1994). Neighborhood networking and community building. In S.Cisler (Ed.), Ties that bind: Building community networks (pp. 134137). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer Corp.
  • Sherrod, L., Flanagan, C., & Youniss, J. (2002). Dimensions of citizenship and opportunities for youth development: The what, why, when, where, and who of citizenship development. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 264272.
  • Smith, M. A., & Kollock, P. (Eds.). (1998). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427459.
  • Squire, K., & The Games-to-Teach Research Team. (2003). Design principles of next-generation gaming for education. Educational Technology, 43(5), 1723.
  • Steinkuehler, C. A. (2004). Learning in massively multiplayer online games. In Y. B.Kafai, W. A.Sandoval, N.Enyedy, A. S.Nixon, & F.Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 521528). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. (2003). Diversity of political conversation on the Internet: Users’ perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8 (3). Retrieved October 8, 2005, from, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.html
  • Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the Net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Thomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
  • Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Basic Books.
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady H., E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyber space: The rise of personalized networks. International Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227252.
  • Wellman, B., Carrington, P., & Hall, A. (1988). Networks as personal communities. In B.Wellman & S. D.Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 130184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Woodard I. V., E. H., & Schmitt, K. L. (2002). Political socialization in the Digital Age: The ‘Student Voices’ program. In S. L.Calvert, A. B.Jordan & R. R.Cocking (Eds.), Children in the digital age: Influences of electronic media on development (pp. 8399). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Wuthnow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion: Caring for others and helping ourselves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in America’s fragmented communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wyatt, R. O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 7192.
  • Wyatt, R. O., Kim, J., & Katz, E. (2000). How feeling free to talk affects ordinary political conversation, purposeful argumentation, and civic participation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 99114.
  • Yates, M., & Youniss, J. (Eds.). (1999). Roots of civic identity: International perspectives on community service and activism in youth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Youniss, J., Bales, S., Christmas-Best, V., Diversi, M., McLaughlin, M., & Silbereisen, R. (2002). Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(1), 121148.
  • Youniss, J., McLellan, J. A., & Yates, M. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 620631.