SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Achrol, R. S. (1991). Evolution of the marketing organization: New forms for turbulent environments. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 7793.
  • Ahuja, M. K., & Carley, K. M. (1998). Network structure in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(4). Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/ahuja.html
  • Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ariss, S., Nykodym, N., & Cole-Laramore, A. A. (2002). Trust and technology in the virtual organization. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 67(4), 2225
  • Baum, J. A. C. (1999). Whole-part coevolutionary competition in organizations. In J. A. C.Baum & B.McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 113136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bosch-Sijtsema, P. (2002). A structure of roles within virtual organizations. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 1(3), 371384.
  • Center for the Advancement of Non-violence. (2002). Retrieved June 26, 2004, from http://www.nonviolenceworks.com/snv/snv/2002/LisaFithian.htm
  • Clases, C., Bachmann, R., & Wehner, T. (2003). Studying trust in the virtual organization. International Studies of Management and Organization, 33(3), 727.
  • Cohen, J. L. (1985). Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements. Social Research, 52(4), 663716.
  • Cravens, D. W., Piercy, N. J., & Shipp, S. H. (1996). New organizational forms for competing in highly dynamic environments: The network paradigm. British Journal of Management, 7(3), 203218.
  • Crossman, A., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2004). Trust, commitment and team working: The paradox of virtual organizations. Global Networks, 4(4), 375390.
  • Danaher, K., & Burbach, R. (2000) Globalize this! The battle against the World Trade Organization and corporate rule. Monroe, ME: Common Courage.
  • De Armond, P. (2000). Netwar in the Emerald City. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://nwcitizen.com/publicgood/reports/wto
  • DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. R. (1998). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3(4). Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/desanctis.html
  • Dholakia, U. M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2004). Motivational antecedents, constituents, and consequents of virtual community identity. In S. H.Godar & S. P.Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies and practice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  • Djelic, M., & Ainamo, A. (1999). The coevolution of new organization forms in the fashion industry: A historical and comparative study of France, Italy, and the United States. Organization Science, 10(5), 622637.
  • Dutton, W. H. (1999). The virtual organization: Tele-Access in business and industry. In J.Fulk & G.DeSanctis (Eds.), Shaping organization form: Communication, connection, and community (pp. 473496). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 5158.
  • Freeman, J. (1979). Resource mobilization and strategy: A model for analyzing social movement organization actions. In M. N.Zald & J. D.McCarthy (Eds.), The dynamics of social movements (pp. 167189). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.
  • Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., Friedman, P. G., & Kreps, G. L. (1991). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Gerlach, L. P. (1999). The structure of social movements: Environmental activism and its opponents. In J.Freeman & V.Johnson (Eds.), Waves of protest: Social movements since the sixties (pp. 8597). Laham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Gibson, M. K., & Papa, M. J. (2000). The mud, the blood, and the beer guys: Organizational osmosis in blue-collar work groups. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28(1), 6888.
  • Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., & Preiss, K. (1994). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: Strategies for enriching the customer. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Grabowski, M., & Roberts, K. H. (1998). Risk mitigation in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). Retrieved March 26, 2006, fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/grabowski.html
  • Guidry, J. A., Kennedy, M. D., & Zald, M. N. (2000). Globalizations and social movements. In J. A.Guidry, M. D.Kennedy & M. N.Zald (Eds.), Globalization and social movements: Culture, power, and the transnational public sphere (pp. 134). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
  • Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 76(2), 3950.
  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. T. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929964.
  • Hian, L. B., Chuan, S. L., Trevor, T. M. K., & Detenber, B. H. (2004). Getting to know you: Exploring the development of relational intimacy in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9 (3). Retrieved March 26, 2006, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue3/detenber.html
  • Hirschhorn, L., & Gilmore, T. (1992, May-June)). The new boundaries of the “boundaryless” company. Harvard Business Review, 70(3), 104115.
  • Jasper, J. M. (1998). The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements. Sociological Forum, 13(3), 397425.
  • Knoke, D. (1990). Organizing for collective action: The political economies of associations. New York: A. de Gruyter.
  • McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 12121241.
  • McPherson, J. M. (1990). Evolution in communities of voluntary organizations. In J.Singh (Ed.), Organizational evolution: New directions (pp. 224245). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Melucci, A. (1988). Getting involved: Identity and mobilization in social movements. International Social Movement Research, 1, 329348.
  • Melucci, A. (1994). A strange kind of newness: What’s ‘new’ in new social movements. In E.Laraña, H.Johnston, & J. R.Gusfield (Eds.), New social movements: From ideology to identity (pp.101130). Philadelphia: Temple University.
  • Melucci, A. (1998). Nomads of the present. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Meyers, D. J. (1994). Communication technology and social movements: Contributions of computer networks to activism. Social Science Computer Review, 12(2), 250260.
  • Monge, P. R., & Fulk, J. (1999). Communication technology for global network organizations. In G.DeSanctis & J.Fulk (Eds.), Shaping organizational form: Communication, connection, and community. (pp. 71100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Nohria, N., & Berkley, J. (1994). The virtual organization: Technology and the implosion of control. In C.Heckscher & A.Donnellon (Eds.), The post-bureaucratic organization (pp. 108128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Owens, L., & Palmer, L. K. (2003). Making the news: Anarchist counters public relations on the world-wide web. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 20, 335361.
  • Palmer, J. W. (1998). The use of information technology in virtual organizations. In M.Igbaria & M.Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 7185). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  • Parker, B. (1996). Evolution and revolution: from international business to globalization. In S. R.Clegg, C.Hardy, & W. R.Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 484506). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 283305.
  • Ring, P. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483498.
  • Rollier, B., & Liou, Y. I. (1998). The mobile workforce: Strategic opportunity, competitive necessity. In M.Igbaria & M.Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 319337). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  • Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M., & May, S. K. (2004). Information adequacy, job satisfaction and organizational culture in a dispersed-network organization. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(1), 2854.
  • Rutherford, K. (2000). The landmine ban and NGOs: The role of communication technologies. Transnational Associations, 2, 6073.
  • Sias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. (1998). From co-workers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of Communication, 62(3), 273299.
  • Smith, J. (1999). Characteristics of the modern transnational movement sectors. In J.Smith, C.Chatfield & R.Pagnucco (Eds.). Transnational social movements and global politics: Solidarity beyond the state (pp. 4258). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
  • Snow, D. (2001). Collective identity and expressive forms. (October 1, 2001). Center for the Study of Democracy. Paper 01-07. Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/01-07
  • Snow, D. A. & Beneford, R. D. (1997). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D.Morris & C. M.Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133155). New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
  • Staples, D. S., Hulland, J. S., & Higgins, C. A. (1998). A self-efficacy theory explanation for the management of remote workers in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(4). Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http:// jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/staples.html
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sypher, B. D. (1990). Case studies in organizational communication. London: Guilford.
  • Tarrow, S. (1992). Mentalities, political cultures, and collective action frames: constructing meanings through action. In A. D.Morris & C. M.Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 174202). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Tarrow, S. (1996). States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. In D.McAdam, J. D.McCarthy & M. N.Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 4161). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements in contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taylor, M., Kent, M. L., & White, W. J. (2001). How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27(3), 263285.
  • Wiesenfeld, B. M., Raghuram, S., & Garud, R. (1998). Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(4). Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/wiesenfeld.html
  • WTO history project (2000, April 15). Nadine Block interview. Retrieved June 26, 2004, from http://depts.washington.edu/wtohist/Interviews/Bloch.htm
  • Zald, M. N. & Ash, R. (1966). Social movement organizations: Growth, decay, and change. Social Forces, 44(3), 327341.