SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abreu, S. (2000). How to manage telecommuters. Retrieved April 27, 2006, from http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/06/19/telecommuting.idg/
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2002). Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 110.
  • Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin, 71(5), 319342.
  • Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In P. A.Katz (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism (pp. 73123). New York: Plenum Press.
  • Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573590.
  • Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 3348.
  • Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Blanchard, F. A., Adelman, L., & Cook, S. W. (1975). Effect of group success and failure upon interpersonal attraction in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(6), 10201030.
  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1(5), 319322.
    Direct Link:
  • Bodenhausen, G. V., & Wyer, R. S. (1985). Effects of stereotypes on decision making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 267282.
  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307324.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In M.Hewstone & R. J.Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 281302). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Brown, R. J. (2000). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M.Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255343). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Brown, R. J., & Wade, G. S. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: The effects of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 131142.
  • Cascio, W. E. (2000). Managing virtual workplace. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 8190.
  • Climent, S., Moré, J., Oliver, A., Salvatierra, M., Taulé, M., Sanchez, I., & Vallmanya, L. (2003). Bilingual newsgroups in Catalonia: A challenge for machine translation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(1). Retrieved April 28, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/climent.html
  • Cook, S. W. (1962). The systematic analysis of socially significant events: A strategy for social research. Journal of Social Issues, 18(2), 6684.
  • Coughlin, D. (2001). Correlating automated and human assessments of machine translation quality. In Proceedings of MT Summit IX (pp. 6370). New Orleans, LA.
  • Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information but you can’t make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 433455.
  • Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998) Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256274.
  • Galegher, J., & Kraut, R. E. (1994). Computer-mediated communication for intellectuall teamwork: An experiment in group writing. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 110138.
  • Garcia-Marques, L., & Mackie, D. M. (1999). The impact of stereotype incongruent information on perceived group variability and stereotype change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 979990.
  • Hamburger, Y. (1994). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Effects of the atypical outgroup member on the outgroup stereotype. Basic Applied Social Psychology, 15(3), 339358.
  • Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the Contact Hypothesis. In M.Hewstone & R. J.Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 144). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hewstone, M., & Hamberger, J. (2000). Perceived variability and stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(2), 103124.
  • Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85111.
  • Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of inter-group anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 700710.
  • Lambert, A. J., Payne, B. K., Shaffer, L. M., Jacoby, L. L., Chasteen, A., & Khan, S. (2003). Stereotypes as dominant responses: On the “social facilitation” of prejudice in anticipated public contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 277295.
  • Leary, M. R. (1983). Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47(1), 6675.
  • McClendon, M. J. (1974). Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice. Sociological Focus, 7(4), 4765.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Causes and consequences of social interaction on the Internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psychology, 1, 249269.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 5775.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Buffardi, L. E. & Seidman, G. (2005). Self presentation to friends and strangers online. In K.-H.Renner, A.Schutz, & F.Machilek (Eds.), Internet and personality (pp. 176189). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Green, A. S. (2002). Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 6(1), 116127.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 931.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., & Seidman, G. (2005). Social identity and the self: Getting connected online. In W. R.Walker & D.Hermann (Eds.), Cognitive technology: Essays on the transformation of thought and society. Jefferson, NC: MacFarland and Company, Inc.
  • McKenna, K. Y. A., Seidman, G., Buffardi, L. E., & Green, A. S. (in preparation). Social anxiety and self-expression to friends and strangers in Internet and face-to-face interactions.
  • Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 387410.
  • Miller, N., & Harrington, H. J. (1992). Social categorization and intergroup acceptance: Principles for design and development of cooperative learning teams. In R.Hertz-Lazarowitz & N.Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 203227). Cambridge, UK: University Press.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1971). Racially separate or together? New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). The affective component of prejudice: Empirical support for the new view. In S. A.Tuch & J. K.Martin (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change (pp. 7690). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 6585.
  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S.Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 93114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., & De Groot, D. (2001). Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 12431254.
  • Riordan, C., & Ruggiero, J. (1980). Producing equal-status interaction: A replication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 131136.
  • Rosenberg, M. J. (2002). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Scarberry, N., Ratcliff, C., Lord, C. G., Lanicek, D., & Desforges, D. M. (1997). Effects of individuating information on the generalization part of Allport’s contact hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(12), 12911299.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1985). Cooperative learning: Applying theory in desegregated schools. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 4562.
  • Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21(4), 427459.
  • Spears, R., Lea, M., & Lee, S. (1990). De-individuation and group polarisation in computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 121134.
  • Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). When are net effects gross products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 91107.
  • Sproull, L., & Faraj, S. (1997). Atheism, sex, and databases: The net as a social technology. In S.Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 3551). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Stephan, W. G., & Cookie, W. (2001). Improving intergroup relations. Newbury, CA: Sage.
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3), 157175.
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1996). Cognition and affect in stereotyping: Parallel interactive networks. In D. W.Mackie & D. L.Hamilton (Eds.), Affect cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 111136). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Taylor, M., Dube, L., & Bellerose, J. (1986). Intergroup contact in Quebec: Myth or reality? In M.Hewstone & R.Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 107118). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Thompson, L., & Nadler, J. (2002). Negotiating via information technology: Theory and application. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 109124.
  • Trew, K. (1986). Catholic-Protestant contact in Northern Ireland. In M.Hewstone & R. J.Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 93106). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 343.
  • Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23(3), 342369.
  • Wilder, D. A. (1993). The role of anxiety in facilitating stereotypic judgments of out-group behavior. In D. M.Mackie & D. L.Hamilton (Eds.) Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 87109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Wilder, D. A., & Shapiro, P. (1989). Role of competition-induced anxiety in limiting the beneficial impact of positive behavior by an out-group member. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 6069.
  • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269274.